Comparison of clinical outcomes and prognosis between surgery and endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with synchronous multifocal early gastric cancer
Abstract Background Synchronous multiple early gastric cancer (SMEGC) refers to the simultaneous occurrence of two or more malignant cancer lesions in the stomach. For patients with multiple early gastric carcinomas, the choice of appropriate treatment remains controversial. This study is dedicated...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2023-09-01
|
Series: | BMC Surgery |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02194-1 |
_version_ | 1797578458835976192 |
---|---|
author | Linsen Bao Hengfei Gao Lingxiao Pu Chao Sui Kangkang Ji Feng Wang Liang Tao Min Feng Meng Wang |
author_facet | Linsen Bao Hengfei Gao Lingxiao Pu Chao Sui Kangkang Ji Feng Wang Liang Tao Min Feng Meng Wang |
author_sort | Linsen Bao |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background Synchronous multiple early gastric cancer (SMEGC) refers to the simultaneous occurrence of two or more malignant cancer lesions in the stomach. For patients with multiple early gastric carcinomas, the choice of appropriate treatment remains controversial. This study is dedicated to comparing the clinical outcomes and prognosis of patients with SMEGC who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or gastrectomy. Methods A total of 180 patients with more than one malignant cancer lesion in the stomach who had received gastrectomy or ESD between 2012 and 2021 were retrospectively evaluated to determine their clinical outcomes and prognosis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were utilized to identify risk factors for tumor recurrence. Results Over the 57.5 months median follow-up period for the 140 enrolled cases, tumor recurrence occurred in 8 (12%) in the ESD group but only 1 (1%) in the surgery group. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was higher in the surgery group (p = 0.023) in all cases; however, there was no significant difference in Overall survival (OS, p = 0.772). Complications were significantly higher in the surgery group than in the ESD group, but fewer in the radical distal gastrectomy group. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that ESD(p = 0.034), the main lesion size > 2 cm(p = 0.019), and undifferentiated tumor(p = 0.022) were independent risk factors for tumor recurrence. Conclusions For the treatment of simultaneous multifocal early gastric cancer, ESD has a good short-term effect and higher quality of life. However, ESD has a higher risk of recurrence than surgery. And we found that the partial gastrectomy appears to be considered as adequate treatment for some SMEGC patients. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T22:23:12Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-5b0a748f62d54e2d9d8bc484d7ba61a8 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1471-2482 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-10T22:23:12Z |
publishDate | 2023-09-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | BMC Surgery |
spelling | doaj.art-5b0a748f62d54e2d9d8bc484d7ba61a82023-11-19T12:13:10ZengBMCBMC Surgery1471-24822023-09-012311910.1186/s12893-023-02194-1Comparison of clinical outcomes and prognosis between surgery and endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with synchronous multifocal early gastric cancerLinsen Bao0Hengfei Gao1Lingxiao Pu2Chao Sui3Kangkang Ji4Feng Wang5Liang Tao6Min Feng7Meng Wang8Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing UniversityDepartment of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing UniversityDepartment of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing UniversityDepartment of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing UniversityMedical School of Nanjing UniversityDepartment of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing UniversityDepartment of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing UniversityDepartment of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing UniversityDepartment of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing UniversityAbstract Background Synchronous multiple early gastric cancer (SMEGC) refers to the simultaneous occurrence of two or more malignant cancer lesions in the stomach. For patients with multiple early gastric carcinomas, the choice of appropriate treatment remains controversial. This study is dedicated to comparing the clinical outcomes and prognosis of patients with SMEGC who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or gastrectomy. Methods A total of 180 patients with more than one malignant cancer lesion in the stomach who had received gastrectomy or ESD between 2012 and 2021 were retrospectively evaluated to determine their clinical outcomes and prognosis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were utilized to identify risk factors for tumor recurrence. Results Over the 57.5 months median follow-up period for the 140 enrolled cases, tumor recurrence occurred in 8 (12%) in the ESD group but only 1 (1%) in the surgery group. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was higher in the surgery group (p = 0.023) in all cases; however, there was no significant difference in Overall survival (OS, p = 0.772). Complications were significantly higher in the surgery group than in the ESD group, but fewer in the radical distal gastrectomy group. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that ESD(p = 0.034), the main lesion size > 2 cm(p = 0.019), and undifferentiated tumor(p = 0.022) were independent risk factors for tumor recurrence. Conclusions For the treatment of simultaneous multifocal early gastric cancer, ESD has a good short-term effect and higher quality of life. However, ESD has a higher risk of recurrence than surgery. And we found that the partial gastrectomy appears to be considered as adequate treatment for some SMEGC patients.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02194-1Synchronous multiple neoplasmsEndoscopic submucosal dissectionSurgical treatmentPrognosis |
spellingShingle | Linsen Bao Hengfei Gao Lingxiao Pu Chao Sui Kangkang Ji Feng Wang Liang Tao Min Feng Meng Wang Comparison of clinical outcomes and prognosis between surgery and endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with synchronous multifocal early gastric cancer BMC Surgery Synchronous multiple neoplasms Endoscopic submucosal dissection Surgical treatment Prognosis |
title | Comparison of clinical outcomes and prognosis between surgery and endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with synchronous multifocal early gastric cancer |
title_full | Comparison of clinical outcomes and prognosis between surgery and endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with synchronous multifocal early gastric cancer |
title_fullStr | Comparison of clinical outcomes and prognosis between surgery and endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with synchronous multifocal early gastric cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of clinical outcomes and prognosis between surgery and endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with synchronous multifocal early gastric cancer |
title_short | Comparison of clinical outcomes and prognosis between surgery and endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with synchronous multifocal early gastric cancer |
title_sort | comparison of clinical outcomes and prognosis between surgery and endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with synchronous multifocal early gastric cancer |
topic | Synchronous multiple neoplasms Endoscopic submucosal dissection Surgical treatment Prognosis |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02194-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linsenbao comparisonofclinicaloutcomesandprognosisbetweensurgeryandendoscopicsubmucosaldissectioninpatientswithsynchronousmultifocalearlygastriccancer AT hengfeigao comparisonofclinicaloutcomesandprognosisbetweensurgeryandendoscopicsubmucosaldissectioninpatientswithsynchronousmultifocalearlygastriccancer AT lingxiaopu comparisonofclinicaloutcomesandprognosisbetweensurgeryandendoscopicsubmucosaldissectioninpatientswithsynchronousmultifocalearlygastriccancer AT chaosui comparisonofclinicaloutcomesandprognosisbetweensurgeryandendoscopicsubmucosaldissectioninpatientswithsynchronousmultifocalearlygastriccancer AT kangkangji comparisonofclinicaloutcomesandprognosisbetweensurgeryandendoscopicsubmucosaldissectioninpatientswithsynchronousmultifocalearlygastriccancer AT fengwang comparisonofclinicaloutcomesandprognosisbetweensurgeryandendoscopicsubmucosaldissectioninpatientswithsynchronousmultifocalearlygastriccancer AT liangtao comparisonofclinicaloutcomesandprognosisbetweensurgeryandendoscopicsubmucosaldissectioninpatientswithsynchronousmultifocalearlygastriccancer AT minfeng comparisonofclinicaloutcomesandprognosisbetweensurgeryandendoscopicsubmucosaldissectioninpatientswithsynchronousmultifocalearlygastriccancer AT mengwang comparisonofclinicaloutcomesandprognosisbetweensurgeryandendoscopicsubmucosaldissectioninpatientswithsynchronousmultifocalearlygastriccancer |