Exercise across the Lung Cancer Care Continuum: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

Background: Growing evidence supports exercise for people with lung cancer. This overview aimed to summarise exercise intervention efficacy and safety across the care continuum. Methods: Eight databases (including Cochrane and Medline) were searched (inception—February 2022) for systematic reviews o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lara Edbrooke, Amy Bowman, Catherine L. Granger, Nicola Burgess, Shaza Abo, Bronwen Connolly, Linda Denehy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-02-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/5/1871
_version_ 1797615018483646464
author Lara Edbrooke
Amy Bowman
Catherine L. Granger
Nicola Burgess
Shaza Abo
Bronwen Connolly
Linda Denehy
author_facet Lara Edbrooke
Amy Bowman
Catherine L. Granger
Nicola Burgess
Shaza Abo
Bronwen Connolly
Linda Denehy
author_sort Lara Edbrooke
collection DOAJ
description Background: Growing evidence supports exercise for people with lung cancer. This overview aimed to summarise exercise intervention efficacy and safety across the care continuum. Methods: Eight databases (including Cochrane and Medline) were searched (inception—February 2022) for systematic reviews of RCTs/quasi-RCTs. Eligibility: population—adults with lung cancer; intervention: exercise (e.g., aerobic, resistance) +/− non-exercise (e.g., nutrition); comparator: usual care/non-exercise; primary outcomes: exercise capacity, physical function, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and post-operative complications. Duplicate, independent title/abstract and full-text screening, data extraction and quality ratings (AMSTAR-2) were completed. Results: Thirty systematic reviews involving between 157 and 2109 participants (n = 6440 total) were included. Most reviews (n = 28) involved surgical participants. Twenty-five reviews performed meta-analyses. The review quality was commonly rated critically low (n = 22) or low (n = 7). Reviews commonly included combinations of aerobic, resistance and/or respiratory exercise interventions. Pre-operative meta-analyses demonstrated that exercise reduces post-operative complications (n = 4/7) and improves exercise capacity (n = 6/6), whilst HRQoL findings were non-significant (n = 3/3). Post-operative meta-analyses reported significant improvements in exercise capacity (n = 2/3) and muscle strength (n = 1/1) and non-significant HRQoL changes (n = 8/10). Interventions delivered to mixed surgical and non-surgical populations improved exercise capacity (n = 3/4), muscle strength (n = 2/2) and HRQoL (n = 3). Meta-analyses of interventions in non-surgical populations demonstrated inconsistent findings. Adverse event rates were low, however, few reviews reported on safety. Conclusions: A large body of evidence supports lung cancer exercise interventions to reduce complications and improve exercise capacity in pre- and post-operative populations. Additional higher-quality research is needed, particularly in the non-surgical population, including subgroup analyses of exercise type and setting.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T07:20:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5b12b4cc0ac04427bcbc4da900c479f6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T07:20:31Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-5b12b4cc0ac04427bcbc4da900c479f62023-11-17T07:59:29ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832023-02-01125187110.3390/jcm12051871Exercise across the Lung Cancer Care Continuum: An Overview of Systematic ReviewsLara Edbrooke0Amy Bowman1Catherine L. Granger2Nicola Burgess3Shaza Abo4Bronwen Connolly5Linda Denehy6Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, AustraliaDepartment of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, AustraliaDepartment of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, AustraliaDepartment of Physiotherapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC 3084, AustraliaDepartment of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, AustraliaWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UKDepartment of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, AustraliaBackground: Growing evidence supports exercise for people with lung cancer. This overview aimed to summarise exercise intervention efficacy and safety across the care continuum. Methods: Eight databases (including Cochrane and Medline) were searched (inception—February 2022) for systematic reviews of RCTs/quasi-RCTs. Eligibility: population—adults with lung cancer; intervention: exercise (e.g., aerobic, resistance) +/− non-exercise (e.g., nutrition); comparator: usual care/non-exercise; primary outcomes: exercise capacity, physical function, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and post-operative complications. Duplicate, independent title/abstract and full-text screening, data extraction and quality ratings (AMSTAR-2) were completed. Results: Thirty systematic reviews involving between 157 and 2109 participants (n = 6440 total) were included. Most reviews (n = 28) involved surgical participants. Twenty-five reviews performed meta-analyses. The review quality was commonly rated critically low (n = 22) or low (n = 7). Reviews commonly included combinations of aerobic, resistance and/or respiratory exercise interventions. Pre-operative meta-analyses demonstrated that exercise reduces post-operative complications (n = 4/7) and improves exercise capacity (n = 6/6), whilst HRQoL findings were non-significant (n = 3/3). Post-operative meta-analyses reported significant improvements in exercise capacity (n = 2/3) and muscle strength (n = 1/1) and non-significant HRQoL changes (n = 8/10). Interventions delivered to mixed surgical and non-surgical populations improved exercise capacity (n = 3/4), muscle strength (n = 2/2) and HRQoL (n = 3). Meta-analyses of interventions in non-surgical populations demonstrated inconsistent findings. Adverse event rates were low, however, few reviews reported on safety. Conclusions: A large body of evidence supports lung cancer exercise interventions to reduce complications and improve exercise capacity in pre- and post-operative populations. Additional higher-quality research is needed, particularly in the non-surgical population, including subgroup analyses of exercise type and setting.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/5/1871lung cancerexerciserehabilitationoverview of reviews
spellingShingle Lara Edbrooke
Amy Bowman
Catherine L. Granger
Nicola Burgess
Shaza Abo
Bronwen Connolly
Linda Denehy
Exercise across the Lung Cancer Care Continuum: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
Journal of Clinical Medicine
lung cancer
exercise
rehabilitation
overview of reviews
title Exercise across the Lung Cancer Care Continuum: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
title_full Exercise across the Lung Cancer Care Continuum: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
title_fullStr Exercise across the Lung Cancer Care Continuum: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
title_full_unstemmed Exercise across the Lung Cancer Care Continuum: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
title_short Exercise across the Lung Cancer Care Continuum: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
title_sort exercise across the lung cancer care continuum an overview of systematic reviews
topic lung cancer
exercise
rehabilitation
overview of reviews
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/5/1871
work_keys_str_mv AT laraedbrooke exerciseacrossthelungcancercarecontinuumanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT amybowman exerciseacrossthelungcancercarecontinuumanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT catherinelgranger exerciseacrossthelungcancercarecontinuumanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT nicolaburgess exerciseacrossthelungcancercarecontinuumanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT shazaabo exerciseacrossthelungcancercarecontinuumanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT bronwenconnolly exerciseacrossthelungcancercarecontinuumanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT lindadenehy exerciseacrossthelungcancercarecontinuumanoverviewofsystematicreviews