Integrating Ecosystem Services Into Assessments of Sustainable Development Goals: A Case Study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, China
Trade-offs between eco-environment protection and socioeconomic development hinder the success of sustainable development goals (SDGs). Solutions based on ecosystem services (ESs) provide the co-benefits and pathways for fulfilling the SDGs. However, assessing the progress towards SDGs based on the...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022-05-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Environmental Science |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.897792/full |
| _version_ | 1811306372226088960 |
|---|---|
| author | Siwei Hu Siwei Hu Yanying Yang Yanying Yang Ang Li Ang Li Kai Liu Kai Liu Changhong Mi Rongguang Shi Rongguang Shi |
| author_facet | Siwei Hu Siwei Hu Yanying Yang Yanying Yang Ang Li Ang Li Kai Liu Kai Liu Changhong Mi Rongguang Shi Rongguang Shi |
| author_sort | Siwei Hu |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Trade-offs between eco-environment protection and socioeconomic development hinder the success of sustainable development goals (SDGs). Solutions based on ecosystem services (ESs) provide the co-benefits and pathways for fulfilling the SDGs. However, assessing the progress towards SDGs based on the contribution of ESs to SDGs is lacking. Here we assessed the spatial-temporal changes of ecosystem service values (ESV) and the SDG scores in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region (BTH) over the past 20 years using “ES-SDG linkages.” The total ESV and ES-SDG Index score in the BTH showed a spatial pattern of high values in the northern plateau and low values in the southern plain. The total ESV increased from 25,335 yuan ha−1 in 2000 to 27,344 yuan ha−1 in 2020, mainly attributed to water provision and water regulation. The decrease of cropland, grassland, and wetland in the BTH between 2000 and 2010 caused a decrease in the value of nine ESs, whereas the increase of forestland, waterbodies and wetland between 2010 and 2020 contributed to an increase in the value of seven ESs. The ES-SDG Index score decreased slightly from 36.8 in 2000 to 35.5 in 2010, and then increased to 36.0 in 2020 due to the control of rapid urbanization and strengthen of ecological restoration. Our study indicates that the changes of ES-SDG Index score mainly depended on food provision, water provision, climate regulation, nutrient cycling, habitat & biodiversity, and cultural services. The assessment of SDGs suggests that SDG6, SDG11, and SDG12 should be prioritized to advance the synergistic development of SDGs in the BTH, which will also enhance the understanding of stakeholders about the progress of achieving SDGs. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T08:43:18Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-5b2b745b48064a79ae049fb610ba5535 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2296-665X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T08:43:18Z |
| publishDate | 2022-05-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Environmental Science |
| spelling | doaj.art-5b2b745b48064a79ae049fb610ba55352022-12-22T02:53:49ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Environmental Science2296-665X2022-05-011010.3389/fenvs.2022.897792897792Integrating Ecosystem Services Into Assessments of Sustainable Development Goals: A Case Study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, ChinaSiwei Hu0Siwei Hu1Yanying Yang2Yanying Yang3Ang Li4Ang Li5Kai Liu6Kai Liu7Changhong Mi8Rongguang Shi9Rongguang Shi10Agro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin, ChinaGraduate School of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, ChinaAgro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin, ChinaKey Laboratory for Environmental Factors Control of Agro-Product Quality Safety, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin, ChinaAgro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin, ChinaGraduate School of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, ChinaAgro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin, ChinaGraduate School of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, ChinaAgro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin, ChinaAgro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin, ChinaKey Laboratory for Environmental Factors Control of Agro-Product Quality Safety, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin, ChinaTrade-offs between eco-environment protection and socioeconomic development hinder the success of sustainable development goals (SDGs). Solutions based on ecosystem services (ESs) provide the co-benefits and pathways for fulfilling the SDGs. However, assessing the progress towards SDGs based on the contribution of ESs to SDGs is lacking. Here we assessed the spatial-temporal changes of ecosystem service values (ESV) and the SDG scores in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region (BTH) over the past 20 years using “ES-SDG linkages.” The total ESV and ES-SDG Index score in the BTH showed a spatial pattern of high values in the northern plateau and low values in the southern plain. The total ESV increased from 25,335 yuan ha−1 in 2000 to 27,344 yuan ha−1 in 2020, mainly attributed to water provision and water regulation. The decrease of cropland, grassland, and wetland in the BTH between 2000 and 2010 caused a decrease in the value of nine ESs, whereas the increase of forestland, waterbodies and wetland between 2010 and 2020 contributed to an increase in the value of seven ESs. The ES-SDG Index score decreased slightly from 36.8 in 2000 to 35.5 in 2010, and then increased to 36.0 in 2020 due to the control of rapid urbanization and strengthen of ecological restoration. Our study indicates that the changes of ES-SDG Index score mainly depended on food provision, water provision, climate regulation, nutrient cycling, habitat & biodiversity, and cultural services. The assessment of SDGs suggests that SDG6, SDG11, and SDG12 should be prioritized to advance the synergistic development of SDGs in the BTH, which will also enhance the understanding of stakeholders about the progress of achieving SDGs.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.897792/fullecosystem service valuessustainable development goalsurbanizationecological restorationland-use management |
| spellingShingle | Siwei Hu Siwei Hu Yanying Yang Yanying Yang Ang Li Ang Li Kai Liu Kai Liu Changhong Mi Rongguang Shi Rongguang Shi Integrating Ecosystem Services Into Assessments of Sustainable Development Goals: A Case Study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, China Frontiers in Environmental Science ecosystem service values sustainable development goals urbanization ecological restoration land-use management |
| title | Integrating Ecosystem Services Into Assessments of Sustainable Development Goals: A Case Study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, China |
| title_full | Integrating Ecosystem Services Into Assessments of Sustainable Development Goals: A Case Study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, China |
| title_fullStr | Integrating Ecosystem Services Into Assessments of Sustainable Development Goals: A Case Study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, China |
| title_full_unstemmed | Integrating Ecosystem Services Into Assessments of Sustainable Development Goals: A Case Study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, China |
| title_short | Integrating Ecosystem Services Into Assessments of Sustainable Development Goals: A Case Study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, China |
| title_sort | integrating ecosystem services into assessments of sustainable development goals a case study of the beijing tianjin hebei region china |
| topic | ecosystem service values sustainable development goals urbanization ecological restoration land-use management |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.897792/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT siweihu integratingecosystemservicesintoassessmentsofsustainabledevelopmentgoalsacasestudyofthebeijingtianjinhebeiregionchina AT siweihu integratingecosystemservicesintoassessmentsofsustainabledevelopmentgoalsacasestudyofthebeijingtianjinhebeiregionchina AT yanyingyang integratingecosystemservicesintoassessmentsofsustainabledevelopmentgoalsacasestudyofthebeijingtianjinhebeiregionchina AT yanyingyang integratingecosystemservicesintoassessmentsofsustainabledevelopmentgoalsacasestudyofthebeijingtianjinhebeiregionchina AT angli integratingecosystemservicesintoassessmentsofsustainabledevelopmentgoalsacasestudyofthebeijingtianjinhebeiregionchina AT angli integratingecosystemservicesintoassessmentsofsustainabledevelopmentgoalsacasestudyofthebeijingtianjinhebeiregionchina AT kailiu integratingecosystemservicesintoassessmentsofsustainabledevelopmentgoalsacasestudyofthebeijingtianjinhebeiregionchina AT kailiu integratingecosystemservicesintoassessmentsofsustainabledevelopmentgoalsacasestudyofthebeijingtianjinhebeiregionchina AT changhongmi integratingecosystemservicesintoassessmentsofsustainabledevelopmentgoalsacasestudyofthebeijingtianjinhebeiregionchina AT rongguangshi integratingecosystemservicesintoassessmentsofsustainabledevelopmentgoalsacasestudyofthebeijingtianjinhebeiregionchina AT rongguangshi integratingecosystemservicesintoassessmentsofsustainabledevelopmentgoalsacasestudyofthebeijingtianjinhebeiregionchina |