A critical note on Mcbrearty and Brooks (2000) “The revolution that wasn’t”

McBrearty and Brooks (2000) provide us with a very important review of the African archaeological evidence. Two core claims are offered from that review: (1) modern behavior emerges gradually, not abruptly; and (2) it emerges in Africa, not in Europe. According to both claims, McBrearty and Brooks c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Víctor Manuel LONGA MARTÍNEZ
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca 2010-08-01
Series:Zephyrus
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.usal.es/index.php/0514-7336/article/view/7231
_version_ 1828555012358275072
author Víctor Manuel LONGA MARTÍNEZ
author_facet Víctor Manuel LONGA MARTÍNEZ
author_sort Víctor Manuel LONGA MARTÍNEZ
collection DOAJ
description McBrearty and Brooks (2000) provide us with a very important review of the African archaeological evidence. Two core claims are offered from that review: (1) modern behavior emerges gradually, not abruptly; and (2) it emerges in Africa, not in Europe. According to both claims, McBrearty and Brooks criticize the “human revolution” model. My paper aims at showing that the second claim is not denied by any of the proponents of such a model. In fact, all of them consider modern behaviour to have emerged in Africa, not in Europe.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T05:47:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5b2bfd03dcde455684497b0942d4908b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0514-7336
2386-3943
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T05:47:06Z
publishDate 2010-08-01
publisher Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca
record_format Article
series Zephyrus
spelling doaj.art-5b2bfd03dcde455684497b0942d4908b2022-12-22T00:35:47ZengEdiciones Universidad de SalamancaZephyrus0514-73362386-39432010-08-016302332477083A critical note on Mcbrearty and Brooks (2000) “The revolution that wasn’t”Víctor Manuel LONGA MARTÍNEZ0Universidad de Santiago de CompostelaMcBrearty and Brooks (2000) provide us with a very important review of the African archaeological evidence. Two core claims are offered from that review: (1) modern behavior emerges gradually, not abruptly; and (2) it emerges in Africa, not in Europe. According to both claims, McBrearty and Brooks criticize the “human revolution” model. My paper aims at showing that the second claim is not denied by any of the proponents of such a model. In fact, all of them consider modern behaviour to have emerged in Africa, not in Europe.https://revistas.usal.es/index.php/0514-7336/article/view/7231modelo de “revolución humana”conducta modernasally mcbreartyallison brookspaleolítico superior
spellingShingle Víctor Manuel LONGA MARTÍNEZ
A critical note on Mcbrearty and Brooks (2000) “The revolution that wasn’t”
Zephyrus
modelo de “revolución humana”
conducta moderna
sally mcbrearty
allison brooks
paleolítico superior
title A critical note on Mcbrearty and Brooks (2000) “The revolution that wasn’t”
title_full A critical note on Mcbrearty and Brooks (2000) “The revolution that wasn’t”
title_fullStr A critical note on Mcbrearty and Brooks (2000) “The revolution that wasn’t”
title_full_unstemmed A critical note on Mcbrearty and Brooks (2000) “The revolution that wasn’t”
title_short A critical note on Mcbrearty and Brooks (2000) “The revolution that wasn’t”
title_sort critical note on mcbrearty and brooks 2000 the revolution that wasn t
topic modelo de “revolución humana”
conducta moderna
sally mcbrearty
allison brooks
paleolítico superior
url https://revistas.usal.es/index.php/0514-7336/article/view/7231
work_keys_str_mv AT victormanuellongamartinez acriticalnoteonmcbreartyandbrooks2000therevolutionthatwasnt
AT victormanuellongamartinez criticalnoteonmcbreartyandbrooks2000therevolutionthatwasnt