Use of Stance Lexical Bundles by Turkish and Japanese EFL Learners and Native English Speakers in Academic Writing

Linguists have been interested in the sequences of words that tend to occur for a long time. The present study examines a particular type of recurrent chunks called lexical bundles (LB). LBs are multi-word expressions and an important component of the fluent linguistic production depends on the co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Meltem MUŞLU
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Gaziantep University 2018-10-01
Series:Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/543597
_version_ 1797922881139638272
author Meltem MUŞLU
author_facet Meltem MUŞLU
author_sort Meltem MUŞLU
collection DOAJ
description Linguists have been interested in the sequences of words that tend to occur for a long time. The present study examines a particular type of recurrent chunks called lexical bundles (LB). LBs are multi-word expressions and an important component of the fluent linguistic production depends on the control of them (Hyland, 2008a). The purpose of this study was to find out the most common stance LBs used in argumentative essays written by native English speakers and Turkish and Japanese EFL learners. It also aimed at finding the structural and functional characteristics of these bundles, and to what extent these structures used by the Turkish and Japanese EFL learners are similar to the ones used by the native speakers. To answer these questions, Louvain Corpus of Native English Essays (LOCNESS), Japanese International Corpus of Learner English (JPICLE) and Turkish International Corpus of Learner English (TICLE) were used. The structures of the stance LBs were determined by following Biber’s (2006) classification and the functions were determined by adapting their classification. The concordancing program WordSmith was used to find and determine the 3-4 word stance LBs. In the statistical analysis, Typetoken ratio and Log Likelihood were used. The results showed that native speakers use lexical bundles least; whereas, Japanese EFL learners use them most frequently. The functions and the structures of LBs vary in each group. Suggestions regarding how to teach these devices in foreign language education were also given
first_indexed 2024-04-10T14:39:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5b35f5e2b9784bcd96a849a935ee0dc3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1303-0094
2149-5459
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T14:39:16Z
publishDate 2018-10-01
publisher Gaziantep University
record_format Article
series Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences
spelling doaj.art-5b35f5e2b9784bcd96a849a935ee0dc32023-02-15T16:08:19ZengGaziantep UniversityGaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences1303-00942149-54592018-10-011741319133610.21547/jss.444386Use of Stance Lexical Bundles by Turkish and Japanese EFL Learners and Native English Speakers in Academic WritingMeltem MUŞLU0Gaziantep UniversityLinguists have been interested in the sequences of words that tend to occur for a long time. The present study examines a particular type of recurrent chunks called lexical bundles (LB). LBs are multi-word expressions and an important component of the fluent linguistic production depends on the control of them (Hyland, 2008a). The purpose of this study was to find out the most common stance LBs used in argumentative essays written by native English speakers and Turkish and Japanese EFL learners. It also aimed at finding the structural and functional characteristics of these bundles, and to what extent these structures used by the Turkish and Japanese EFL learners are similar to the ones used by the native speakers. To answer these questions, Louvain Corpus of Native English Essays (LOCNESS), Japanese International Corpus of Learner English (JPICLE) and Turkish International Corpus of Learner English (TICLE) were used. The structures of the stance LBs were determined by following Biber’s (2006) classification and the functions were determined by adapting their classification. The concordancing program WordSmith was used to find and determine the 3-4 word stance LBs. In the statistical analysis, Typetoken ratio and Log Likelihood were used. The results showed that native speakers use lexical bundles least; whereas, Japanese EFL learners use them most frequently. The functions and the structures of LBs vary in each group. Suggestions regarding how to teach these devices in foreign language education were also givenhttp://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/543597Lexical bundlesCorpus LinguisticsstanceContrastive Interlanguage Analysisacademic writingTurkish and Japanese EFL learners
spellingShingle Meltem MUŞLU
Use of Stance Lexical Bundles by Turkish and Japanese EFL Learners and Native English Speakers in Academic Writing
Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences
Lexical bundles
Corpus Linguistics
stance
Contrastive Interlanguage Analysis
academic writing
Turkish and Japanese EFL learners
title Use of Stance Lexical Bundles by Turkish and Japanese EFL Learners and Native English Speakers in Academic Writing
title_full Use of Stance Lexical Bundles by Turkish and Japanese EFL Learners and Native English Speakers in Academic Writing
title_fullStr Use of Stance Lexical Bundles by Turkish and Japanese EFL Learners and Native English Speakers in Academic Writing
title_full_unstemmed Use of Stance Lexical Bundles by Turkish and Japanese EFL Learners and Native English Speakers in Academic Writing
title_short Use of Stance Lexical Bundles by Turkish and Japanese EFL Learners and Native English Speakers in Academic Writing
title_sort use of stance lexical bundles by turkish and japanese efl learners and native english speakers in academic writing
topic Lexical bundles
Corpus Linguistics
stance
Contrastive Interlanguage Analysis
academic writing
Turkish and Japanese EFL learners
url http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/543597
work_keys_str_mv AT meltemmuslu useofstancelexicalbundlesbyturkishandjapaneseefllearnersandnativeenglishspeakersinacademicwriting