A comparison of impact and risk assessment methods based on the IMO Guidelines and EU invasive alien species risk assessment frameworks
A comparative analysis of two risk assessment (RA) frameworks developed to support the implementation of the international Ballast Water Management Convention (BWMC) and European Regulation on Invasive Alien Species (IAS) was performed. This analysis revealed both differences and similarities betwee...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
PeerJ Inc.
2019-06-01
|
| Series: | PeerJ |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://peerj.com/articles/6965.pdf |
| _version_ | 1827605699411050496 |
|---|---|
| author | Greta Srėbalienė Sergej Olenin Dan Minchin Aleksas Narščius |
| author_facet | Greta Srėbalienė Sergej Olenin Dan Minchin Aleksas Narščius |
| author_sort | Greta Srėbalienė |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | A comparative analysis of two risk assessment (RA) frameworks developed to support the implementation of the international Ballast Water Management Convention (BWMC) and European Regulation on Invasive Alien Species (IAS) was performed. This analysis revealed both differences and similarities between the IMO Risk Assessment Guidelines (IMO, 2007) and EU Regulation supplement on RA of IAS (EU, 2018) in RA approaches, key principles, RA components and categories of IAS impacts recommended for assessment. The results of this analysis were used to produce a common procedure for the evaluation of the bioinvasion risk and impact assessment methods intended to support international, regional and/or national policy on IAS. The procedure includes a scoring scheme to assess compliance with the key principles, RA components and categories of bioinvasion impacts taken into account by the methods. In these methods the categories of impacts on human health and economy are underrepresented comparing with impacts on environment. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-09T06:25:51Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-5b3fc8f43f8c4b7f993738e541afdaff |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2167-8359 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-09T06:25:51Z |
| publishDate | 2019-06-01 |
| publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PeerJ |
| spelling | doaj.art-5b3fc8f43f8c4b7f993738e541afdaff2023-12-03T11:21:13ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592019-06-017e696510.7717/peerj.6965A comparison of impact and risk assessment methods based on the IMO Guidelines and EU invasive alien species risk assessment frameworksGreta Srėbalienė0Sergej Olenin1Dan Minchin2Aleksas Narščius3Marine Research Institute, Klaipėda University, Klaipėda, LithuaniaMarine Research Institute, Klaipėda University, Klaipėda, LithuaniaMarine Research Institute, Klaipėda University, Klaipėda, LithuaniaMarine Research Institute, Klaipėda University, Klaipėda, LithuaniaA comparative analysis of two risk assessment (RA) frameworks developed to support the implementation of the international Ballast Water Management Convention (BWMC) and European Regulation on Invasive Alien Species (IAS) was performed. This analysis revealed both differences and similarities between the IMO Risk Assessment Guidelines (IMO, 2007) and EU Regulation supplement on RA of IAS (EU, 2018) in RA approaches, key principles, RA components and categories of IAS impacts recommended for assessment. The results of this analysis were used to produce a common procedure for the evaluation of the bioinvasion risk and impact assessment methods intended to support international, regional and/or national policy on IAS. The procedure includes a scoring scheme to assess compliance with the key principles, RA components and categories of bioinvasion impacts taken into account by the methods. In these methods the categories of impacts on human health and economy are underrepresented comparing with impacts on environment.https://peerj.com/articles/6965.pdfRisk assessmentInvasive alien speciesImpactIMO guidelinesPolicy relevanceBiosecurity |
| spellingShingle | Greta Srėbalienė Sergej Olenin Dan Minchin Aleksas Narščius A comparison of impact and risk assessment methods based on the IMO Guidelines and EU invasive alien species risk assessment frameworks PeerJ Risk assessment Invasive alien species Impact IMO guidelines Policy relevance Biosecurity |
| title | A comparison of impact and risk assessment methods based on the IMO Guidelines and EU invasive alien species risk assessment frameworks |
| title_full | A comparison of impact and risk assessment methods based on the IMO Guidelines and EU invasive alien species risk assessment frameworks |
| title_fullStr | A comparison of impact and risk assessment methods based on the IMO Guidelines and EU invasive alien species risk assessment frameworks |
| title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of impact and risk assessment methods based on the IMO Guidelines and EU invasive alien species risk assessment frameworks |
| title_short | A comparison of impact and risk assessment methods based on the IMO Guidelines and EU invasive alien species risk assessment frameworks |
| title_sort | comparison of impact and risk assessment methods based on the imo guidelines and eu invasive alien species risk assessment frameworks |
| topic | Risk assessment Invasive alien species Impact IMO guidelines Policy relevance Biosecurity |
| url | https://peerj.com/articles/6965.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gretasrebaliene acomparisonofimpactandriskassessmentmethodsbasedontheimoguidelinesandeuinvasivealienspeciesriskassessmentframeworks AT sergejolenin acomparisonofimpactandriskassessmentmethodsbasedontheimoguidelinesandeuinvasivealienspeciesriskassessmentframeworks AT danminchin acomparisonofimpactandriskassessmentmethodsbasedontheimoguidelinesandeuinvasivealienspeciesriskassessmentframeworks AT aleksasnarscius acomparisonofimpactandriskassessmentmethodsbasedontheimoguidelinesandeuinvasivealienspeciesriskassessmentframeworks AT gretasrebaliene comparisonofimpactandriskassessmentmethodsbasedontheimoguidelinesandeuinvasivealienspeciesriskassessmentframeworks AT sergejolenin comparisonofimpactandriskassessmentmethodsbasedontheimoguidelinesandeuinvasivealienspeciesriskassessmentframeworks AT danminchin comparisonofimpactandriskassessmentmethodsbasedontheimoguidelinesandeuinvasivealienspeciesriskassessmentframeworks AT aleksasnarscius comparisonofimpactandriskassessmentmethodsbasedontheimoguidelinesandeuinvasivealienspeciesriskassessmentframeworks |