Globalising innovation through co-inventions–the success case of the Korean lithium-ion battery industry

Radical innovations can shift the global competitiveness of entire nations. While countries typically struggle to absorb knowledge about novel technologies quickly, in which knowledge tends to be spatially sticky, an important exception is the fast catch-up of the Korean Li-ion battery industry from...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leopold Peiseler, Ye Lin Jun, Nicolas Schmid, Paul Waidelich, Abhishek Malhotra, Tobias S Schmidt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2024-01-01
Series:Environmental Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad28da
_version_ 1827346396414476288
author Leopold Peiseler
Ye Lin Jun
Nicolas Schmid
Paul Waidelich
Abhishek Malhotra
Tobias S Schmidt
author_facet Leopold Peiseler
Ye Lin Jun
Nicolas Schmid
Paul Waidelich
Abhishek Malhotra
Tobias S Schmidt
author_sort Leopold Peiseler
collection DOAJ
description Radical innovations can shift the global competitiveness of entire nations. While countries typically struggle to absorb knowledge about novel technologies quickly, in which knowledge tends to be spatially sticky, an important exception is the fast catch-up of the Korean Li-ion battery industry from Japan in the early 2000s. In this paper, we conduct an exploratory case study on this surprising success story. Focussing on patent co-inventions between Korea and Japan, we investigate their significance, as well as underlying types of co-inventions and types of transferred knowledge. To this end, we proceed in four steps: (1) a Poisson regression model; (2) social network analyses; (3) patent inventor tracking and (4) patent coding. Our results indicate that Korean–Japanese co-inventions hold significantly greater influence than other cross-country co-inventions, including with patents without cross-country collaboration. We find a pronounced knowledge-transfer intensity during the early 2000s and observe two types of co-inventions: organisation-level and inventor-level. Predominantly, we observe inventor-level co-inventions, i.e. Korean companies hiring experienced Japanese engineers, that proved important to transferring sticky knowledge. Moreover, while most patents target the design of core battery components, the share of manufacturing patents are—contrary to theoretical expectations—highest during the first half of the observation period. We also discuss our findings and draw implications for policy, industrial and academic players, including industry localisation policies, technology-inherent catch-up strategies and directions for future research.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T23:29:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5b41dd7a852a4b23ba43088f2737e4aa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-9326
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T23:29:34Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Environmental Research Letters
spelling doaj.art-5b41dd7a852a4b23ba43088f2737e4aa2024-02-20T17:26:04ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262024-01-0119303402510.1088/1748-9326/ad28daGlobalising innovation through co-inventions–the success case of the Korean lithium-ion battery industryLeopold Peiseler0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0273-7052Ye Lin Jun1Nicolas Schmid2Paul Waidelich3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5081-776XAbhishek Malhotra4Tobias S Schmidt5https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7971-2187Energy and Technology Policy Group, ETH Zurich , Clausiusstrasse 37, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland; Materials and Device Engineering Group, ETH Zurich , Gloriastrasse 35, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland; Institute for Science, Technology and Policy, ETH Zurich , Universitätstrasse 41, CH-8092 Zurich, SwitzerlandEnergy and Technology Policy Group, ETH Zurich , Clausiusstrasse 37, CH-8092 Zurich, SwitzerlandEnergy and Technology Policy Group, ETH Zurich , Clausiusstrasse 37, CH-8092 Zurich, SwitzerlandClimate Finance and Policy Group, ETH Zurich , Clausiusstrasse 37, CH-8092 Zurich, SwitzerlandSchool of Public Policy, IIT Delhi; Hauz Khas , New Delhi 110016, India; Belfer Center, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University , 79 John F. Kennedy St, Cambridge, MA 02138, United States of AmericaEnergy and Technology Policy Group, ETH Zurich , Clausiusstrasse 37, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland; Institute for Science, Technology and Policy, ETH Zurich , Universitätstrasse 41, CH-8092 Zurich, SwitzerlandRadical innovations can shift the global competitiveness of entire nations. While countries typically struggle to absorb knowledge about novel technologies quickly, in which knowledge tends to be spatially sticky, an important exception is the fast catch-up of the Korean Li-ion battery industry from Japan in the early 2000s. In this paper, we conduct an exploratory case study on this surprising success story. Focussing on patent co-inventions between Korea and Japan, we investigate their significance, as well as underlying types of co-inventions and types of transferred knowledge. To this end, we proceed in four steps: (1) a Poisson regression model; (2) social network analyses; (3) patent inventor tracking and (4) patent coding. Our results indicate that Korean–Japanese co-inventions hold significantly greater influence than other cross-country co-inventions, including with patents without cross-country collaboration. We find a pronounced knowledge-transfer intensity during the early 2000s and observe two types of co-inventions: organisation-level and inventor-level. Predominantly, we observe inventor-level co-inventions, i.e. Korean companies hiring experienced Japanese engineers, that proved important to transferring sticky knowledge. Moreover, while most patents target the design of core battery components, the share of manufacturing patents are—contrary to theoretical expectations—highest during the first half of the observation period. We also discuss our findings and draw implications for policy, industrial and academic players, including industry localisation policies, technology-inherent catch-up strategies and directions for future research.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad28daknowledge transferco-inventionpatent analysisinnovationlithium-ion batteryJapan–Korea
spellingShingle Leopold Peiseler
Ye Lin Jun
Nicolas Schmid
Paul Waidelich
Abhishek Malhotra
Tobias S Schmidt
Globalising innovation through co-inventions–the success case of the Korean lithium-ion battery industry
Environmental Research Letters
knowledge transfer
co-invention
patent analysis
innovation
lithium-ion battery
Japan–Korea
title Globalising innovation through co-inventions–the success case of the Korean lithium-ion battery industry
title_full Globalising innovation through co-inventions–the success case of the Korean lithium-ion battery industry
title_fullStr Globalising innovation through co-inventions–the success case of the Korean lithium-ion battery industry
title_full_unstemmed Globalising innovation through co-inventions–the success case of the Korean lithium-ion battery industry
title_short Globalising innovation through co-inventions–the success case of the Korean lithium-ion battery industry
title_sort globalising innovation through co inventions the success case of the korean lithium ion battery industry
topic knowledge transfer
co-invention
patent analysis
innovation
lithium-ion battery
Japan–Korea
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad28da
work_keys_str_mv AT leopoldpeiseler globalisinginnovationthroughcoinventionsthesuccesscaseofthekoreanlithiumionbatteryindustry
AT yelinjun globalisinginnovationthroughcoinventionsthesuccesscaseofthekoreanlithiumionbatteryindustry
AT nicolasschmid globalisinginnovationthroughcoinventionsthesuccesscaseofthekoreanlithiumionbatteryindustry
AT paulwaidelich globalisinginnovationthroughcoinventionsthesuccesscaseofthekoreanlithiumionbatteryindustry
AT abhishekmalhotra globalisinginnovationthroughcoinventionsthesuccesscaseofthekoreanlithiumionbatteryindustry
AT tobiassschmidt globalisinginnovationthroughcoinventionsthesuccesscaseofthekoreanlithiumionbatteryindustry