Effect of experimental hookworm infection on insulin resistance in people at risk of type 2 diabetes

Abstract The reduced prevalence of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes in countries with endemic parasitic worm infections suggests a protective role for worms against metabolic disorders, however clinical evidence has been non-existent. This 2-year randomised, double-blinded clinical trial in Au...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Doris R. Pierce, Malcolm McDonald, Lea Merone, Luke Becker, Fintan Thompson, Chris Lewis, Rachael Y. M. Ryan, Sze Fui Hii, Patsy A. Zendejas-Heredia, Rebecca J. Traub, Matthew A. Field, Tony Rahman, John Croese, Alex Loukas, Robyn McDermott, Paul R. Giacomin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-07-01
Series:Nature Communications
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40263-4
_version_ 1797769433498779648
author Doris R. Pierce
Malcolm McDonald
Lea Merone
Luke Becker
Fintan Thompson
Chris Lewis
Rachael Y. M. Ryan
Sze Fui Hii
Patsy A. Zendejas-Heredia
Rebecca J. Traub
Matthew A. Field
Tony Rahman
John Croese
Alex Loukas
Robyn McDermott
Paul R. Giacomin
author_facet Doris R. Pierce
Malcolm McDonald
Lea Merone
Luke Becker
Fintan Thompson
Chris Lewis
Rachael Y. M. Ryan
Sze Fui Hii
Patsy A. Zendejas-Heredia
Rebecca J. Traub
Matthew A. Field
Tony Rahman
John Croese
Alex Loukas
Robyn McDermott
Paul R. Giacomin
author_sort Doris R. Pierce
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The reduced prevalence of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes in countries with endemic parasitic worm infections suggests a protective role for worms against metabolic disorders, however clinical evidence has been non-existent. This 2-year randomised, double-blinded clinical trial in Australia of hookworm infection in 40 male and female adults at risk of type 2 diabetes assessed the safety and potential metabolic benefits of treatment with either 20 (n = 14) or 40 (n = 13) Necator americanus larvae (L3) or Placebo (n = 13) (Registration ACTRN12617000818336). Primary outcome was safety defined by adverse events and completion rate. Homoeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, fasting blood glucose and body mass were key secondary outcomes. Adverse events were more frequent in hookworm-treated participants, where 44% experienced expected gastrointestinal symptoms, but completion rates were comparable to Placebo. Fasting glucose and insulin resistance were lowered in both hookworm-treated groups at 1 year, and body mass was reduced after L3-20 treatment at 2 years. This study suggests hookworm infection is safe in people at risk of type 2 diabetes and associated with improved insulin resistance, warranting further exploration of the benefits of hookworms on metabolic health.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T21:07:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5b424d44f7ae4b2e899f402c57cbee3b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2041-1723
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T21:07:58Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Nature Communications
spelling doaj.art-5b424d44f7ae4b2e899f402c57cbee3b2023-07-30T11:19:59ZengNature PortfolioNature Communications2041-17232023-07-0114111110.1038/s41467-023-40263-4Effect of experimental hookworm infection on insulin resistance in people at risk of type 2 diabetesDoris R. Pierce0Malcolm McDonald1Lea Merone2Luke Becker3Fintan Thompson4Chris Lewis5Rachael Y. M. Ryan6Sze Fui Hii7Patsy A. Zendejas-Heredia8Rebecca J. Traub9Matthew A. Field10Tony Rahman11John Croese12Alex Loukas13Robyn McDermott14Paul R. Giacomin15Centre for Molecular Therapeutics, Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook UniversityCentre for Molecular Therapeutics, Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook UniversityCollege of Health Sciences, James Cook UniversityCentre for Molecular Therapeutics, Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook UniversityCentre for Molecular Therapeutics, Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook UniversityCollege of Health Sciences, James Cook UniversityCentre for Molecular Therapeutics, Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook UniversityMelbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of MelbourneMelbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of MelbourneMelbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of MelbourneCentre for Molecular Therapeutics, Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook UniversityThe Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Prince Charles HospitalCentre for Molecular Therapeutics, Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook UniversityCentre for Molecular Therapeutics, Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook UniversityCentre for Molecular Therapeutics, Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook UniversityCentre for Molecular Therapeutics, Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook UniversityAbstract The reduced prevalence of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes in countries with endemic parasitic worm infections suggests a protective role for worms against metabolic disorders, however clinical evidence has been non-existent. This 2-year randomised, double-blinded clinical trial in Australia of hookworm infection in 40 male and female adults at risk of type 2 diabetes assessed the safety and potential metabolic benefits of treatment with either 20 (n = 14) or 40 (n = 13) Necator americanus larvae (L3) or Placebo (n = 13) (Registration ACTRN12617000818336). Primary outcome was safety defined by adverse events and completion rate. Homoeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, fasting blood glucose and body mass were key secondary outcomes. Adverse events were more frequent in hookworm-treated participants, where 44% experienced expected gastrointestinal symptoms, but completion rates were comparable to Placebo. Fasting glucose and insulin resistance were lowered in both hookworm-treated groups at 1 year, and body mass was reduced after L3-20 treatment at 2 years. This study suggests hookworm infection is safe in people at risk of type 2 diabetes and associated with improved insulin resistance, warranting further exploration of the benefits of hookworms on metabolic health.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40263-4
spellingShingle Doris R. Pierce
Malcolm McDonald
Lea Merone
Luke Becker
Fintan Thompson
Chris Lewis
Rachael Y. M. Ryan
Sze Fui Hii
Patsy A. Zendejas-Heredia
Rebecca J. Traub
Matthew A. Field
Tony Rahman
John Croese
Alex Loukas
Robyn McDermott
Paul R. Giacomin
Effect of experimental hookworm infection on insulin resistance in people at risk of type 2 diabetes
Nature Communications
title Effect of experimental hookworm infection on insulin resistance in people at risk of type 2 diabetes
title_full Effect of experimental hookworm infection on insulin resistance in people at risk of type 2 diabetes
title_fullStr Effect of experimental hookworm infection on insulin resistance in people at risk of type 2 diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Effect of experimental hookworm infection on insulin resistance in people at risk of type 2 diabetes
title_short Effect of experimental hookworm infection on insulin resistance in people at risk of type 2 diabetes
title_sort effect of experimental hookworm infection on insulin resistance in people at risk of type 2 diabetes
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40263-4
work_keys_str_mv AT dorisrpierce effectofexperimentalhookworminfectiononinsulinresistanceinpeopleatriskoftype2diabetes
AT malcolmmcdonald effectofexperimentalhookworminfectiononinsulinresistanceinpeopleatriskoftype2diabetes
AT leamerone effectofexperimentalhookworminfectiononinsulinresistanceinpeopleatriskoftype2diabetes
AT lukebecker effectofexperimentalhookworminfectiononinsulinresistanceinpeopleatriskoftype2diabetes
AT fintanthompson effectofexperimentalhookworminfectiononinsulinresistanceinpeopleatriskoftype2diabetes
AT chrislewis effectofexperimentalhookworminfectiononinsulinresistanceinpeopleatriskoftype2diabetes
AT rachaelymryan effectofexperimentalhookworminfectiononinsulinresistanceinpeopleatriskoftype2diabetes
AT szefuihii effectofexperimentalhookworminfectiononinsulinresistanceinpeopleatriskoftype2diabetes
AT patsyazendejasheredia effectofexperimentalhookworminfectiononinsulinresistanceinpeopleatriskoftype2diabetes
AT rebeccajtraub effectofexperimentalhookworminfectiononinsulinresistanceinpeopleatriskoftype2diabetes
AT matthewafield effectofexperimentalhookworminfectiononinsulinresistanceinpeopleatriskoftype2diabetes
AT tonyrahman effectofexperimentalhookworminfectiononinsulinresistanceinpeopleatriskoftype2diabetes
AT johncroese effectofexperimentalhookworminfectiononinsulinresistanceinpeopleatriskoftype2diabetes
AT alexloukas effectofexperimentalhookworminfectiononinsulinresistanceinpeopleatriskoftype2diabetes
AT robynmcdermott effectofexperimentalhookworminfectiononinsulinresistanceinpeopleatriskoftype2diabetes
AT paulrgiacomin effectofexperimentalhookworminfectiononinsulinresistanceinpeopleatriskoftype2diabetes