The ozone–climate penalty over South America and Africa by 2100

<p>Climate change has the potential to increase surface ozone (<span class="inline-formula">O<sub>3</sub></span>) concentrations, known as the “ozone–climate penalty”, through changes to atmospheric chemistry, transport and dry deposition. In the tropics, the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: F. Brown, G. A. Folberth, S. Sitch, S. Bauer, M. Bauters, P. Boeckx, A. W. Cheesman, M. Deushi, I. Dos Santos Vieira, C. Galy-Lacaux, J. Haywood, J. Keeble, L. M. Mercado, F. M. O'Connor, N. Oshima, K. Tsigaridis, H. Verbeeck
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2022-09-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/12331/2022/acp-22-12331-2022.pdf
Description
Summary:<p>Climate change has the potential to increase surface ozone (<span class="inline-formula">O<sub>3</sub></span>) concentrations, known as the “ozone–climate penalty”, through changes to atmospheric chemistry, transport and dry deposition. In the tropics, the response of surface <span class="inline-formula">O<sub>3</sub></span> to changing climate is relatively understudied but has important consequences for air pollution and human and ecosystem health. In this study, we evaluate the change in surface <span class="inline-formula">O<sub>3</sub></span> due to climate change over South America and Africa using three state-of-the-art Earth system models that follow the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 3-7.0 emission scenario from CMIP6. In order to quantify changes due to climate change alone, we evaluate the difference between simulations including climate change and simulations with a fixed present-day climate. We find that by 2100, models predict an ozone–climate penalty in areas where <span class="inline-formula">O<sub>3</sub></span> is already predicted to be high due to the impacts of precursor emissions, namely urban and biomass burning areas, although on average, models predict a decrease in surface <span class="inline-formula">O<sub>3</sub></span> due to climate change. We identify a small but robust positive trend in annual mean surface <span class="inline-formula">O<sub>3</sub></span> over polluted areas. Additionally, during biomass burning seasons, seasonal mean <span class="inline-formula">O<sub>3</sub></span> concentrations increase by 15 ppb (model range 12 to 18 ppb) in areas with substantial biomass burning such as the arc of deforestation in the Amazon. The ozone–climate penalty in polluted areas is shown to be driven by an increased rate of <span class="inline-formula">O<sub>3</sub></span> chemical production, which is strongly influenced by <span class="inline-formula">NO<sub><i>x</i></sub></span> concentrations and is therefore specific to the emission pathway chosen. Multiple linear regression finds the change in <span class="inline-formula">NO<sub><i>x</i></sub></span> concentration to be a strong predictor of the change in <span class="inline-formula">O<sub>3</sub></span> production, whereas increased isoprene emission rate is positively correlated with increased <span class="inline-formula">O<sub>3</sub></span> destruction, suggesting <span class="inline-formula">NO<sub><i>x</i></sub></span>-limited conditions over the majority of tropical Africa and South America. However, models disagree on the role of climate change in remote, low-<span class="inline-formula">NO<sub><i>x</i></sub></span> regions, partly because of significant differences in <span class="inline-formula">NO<sub><i>x</i></sub></span> concentrations produced by each model. We also find that the magnitude and location of the ozone–climate penalty in the Congo Basin has greater inter-model variation than that in the Amazon, so further model development and validation are needed to constrain the response in central Africa. We conclude that if the climate were to change according to the emission scenario used here, models predict that forested areas in biomass burning locations and urban populations will be at increasing risk of high <span class="inline-formula">O<sub>3</sub></span> exposure, irrespective of any direct impacts on <span class="inline-formula">O<sub>3</sub></span> via the prescribed emission scenario.</p>
ISSN:1680-7316
1680-7324