Update on the Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Full-Arch Impressions of Partially Edentulous and Fully Dentate Jaws in Young and Elderly Subjects: A Clinical Trial

Update on the Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Full-Arch Impressions of Partially Edentulous and Fully Dentate Jaws in Young and Elderly Subjects: A Clinical Trial

To update the available literature on the accuracy of conventional and digital full-arch impressions using the latest hardware and software, participants of different age groups and dental status were investigated. An established reference aid-based method was applied to analyze five intraoral scann...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Maximiliane Amelie Schlenz, Julian Maximilian Stillersfeld, Bernd Wöstmann, Alexander Schmidt
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	MDPI AG 2022-06-01
Series:	Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:	clinical study intraoral scanners digital dentistry impression techniques full-arch impression elderly population
Online Access:	https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/13/3723

Similar Items

What to Prefer in Patients with Multibracket Appliances? Digital vs. Conventional Full-Arch Impressions—A Reference Aid-Based In Vivo Study
by: Niko Christian Bock, et al.
Published: (2023-04-01)

Solid index versus intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: in vitro trueness evaluation
by: Francesco Guido Mangano, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01)

Comparison of Milled Full-Arch Implant-Supported Frameworks Realised with a Full Digital Workflow or from Conventional Impression: A Clinical Study
by: Francesco Pera, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01)

Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro study
by: Francesco Guido Mangano, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01)

Assessment of Fit on Ten Screw-Retained FrameworksRealized through Digital Full-Arch Implant Impression
by: Maurizio De Francesco, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01)

In Vitro Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Impressions for Full-Arch Implant-Supported Prostheses
by: Rani D’haese, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)

Effect of assistive devices on the precision of digital impressions for implants placed in edentulous maxilla: an in vitro study
by: Rena Masu, et al.
Published: (2021-12-01)

The Influence of Hard- and Software Improvement of Intraoral Scanners on the Implant Transfer Accuracy from 2012 to 2021: An In Vitro Study
by: Alexander Schmidt, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01)

Evaluation of Intraoral Full-Arch Scan versus Conventional Preliminary Impression
by: Kinga Mária Jánosi, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01)

A novel in vivo method to evaluate trueness of digital impressions
by: Emad A. Albdour, et al.
Published: (2018-07-01)

Accuracy of Master Casts Generated Using Conventional and Digital Impression Modalities: Part 2—The Full Arch Dimension
by: Mohammed E. Sayed, et al.
Published: (2022-02-01)

Accuracy of Master Casts Generated Using Conventional and Digital Impression Modalities: Part 1—The Half-Arch Dimension
by: Mohammed E. Sayed, et al.
Published: (2021-12-01)

Accuracy of digital impressions for implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis when using an auxiliary geometry device
by: Hale Arikan, et al.
Published: (2023-04-01)

Comparison of digital and silicone impressions for single-tooth implants and two- and three-unit implants for a free-end edentulous saddle
by: Koudai Nagata, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01)

Complete-Arch Accuracy of Four Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study
by: Giordano Celeghin, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01)

Digital impressions: One-step closer to precision
by: Shalu Samar Mondal, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)

Influence of the implant scan body modifications on trueness of digital impressions
by: Sema Merve Uzel, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01)

APPLICATION OF INTRAORAL SCANNERS IN PROSTHETIC TREATMENT OF EDENTULOUS PATIENTS
by: Zhanina Pavlova
Published: (2023-10-01)

Computerized Optical Impression Making of Fully Dentate Upper and Lower Jaws: An In Vitro Study
by: Lukas Droste, et al.
Published: (2024-03-01)

Students’ perspectives on the use of digital versus conventional dental impression techniques in orthodontics
by: Timm C. Schott, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01)

Effect of defect size and tooth anatomy in the measurements of a 3D patient monitoring tool
by: Beatriz Gimenez-Gonzalez, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01)

Trueness and precision of digital implant impressions by intraoral scanners: a literature review
by: Minoru Sanda, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01)

Digital Intraoral Scanners and Alginate Impressions in Reproducing Full Dental Arches: A Comparative 3D Assessment
by: Kyungmin Clara Lee, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01)

A comparative evaluation of intraoral and extraoral digital impressions: An in vivo study
by: Gursharan Kaur Sason, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

Accuracy of digital impressions for three-unit and four-unit implant supported fixed dental prostheses using a novel device
by: Tzu-Yung Kao, et al.
Published: (2023-04-01)

Accuracy of Intraoral Scanner for Recording Completely Edentulous Arches—A Systematic Review
by: Gunjan Srivastava, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01)

Analysis of the impact of various finish line designs and occlusal morphologies on the accuracy of digital impressions
by: Aylin Gunel, et al.
Published: (2023-07-01)

Accuracy of Computerized Optical Impression Making in Fabrication of Removable Dentures for Partially Edentulous Jaws: An In Vivo Feasibility Study
by: Babak Saravi, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01)

Reliability and Time Efficiency of Digital vs. Analog Bite Registration Technique for the Manufacture of Full-Arch Fixed Implant Prostheses
by: Philippe Nuytens, et al.
Published: (2022-05-01)

Possible errors during the optical impression procedure
by: Todorović Aleksandar, et al.
Published: (2010-01-01)

Accuracy of Extraoral Digital Impressions with Multi-Unit Implants
by: Manuel António Sampaio-Fernandes, et al.
Published: (2023-07-01)

Chairside 3-D printed impression trays: a new approach to increase the accuracy of conventional implant impression taking? An in vitro study
by: Alexander Schmidt, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01)

Analysis of the relationship between the surface topography of prepared tooth surfaces and data quality of digital impressions from an intraoral scanner
by: Neset Volkan Asar, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)

Implant Impression Techniques using Different Materials and Methods: A Review
by: Muhammed Necati Yasar, et al.
Published: (2022-02-01)

Pneumatic impression: Improving dental arch impression with an inflatable balloon
by: Lokendra Gupta
Published: (2016-01-01)

Application of three-dimensional reconstruction technology in dentistry: a narrative review
by: Yueyan Cen, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01)

A New Method to Evaluate Trueness and Precision of Digital and Conventional Impression Techniques for Complete Dental Arch
by: KweonSoo Seo, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01)

Influence of Implant Scanbody Wear on the Accuracy of Digital Impression for Complete-Arch: A Randomized In Vitro Trial
by: Lorenzo Arcuri, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)

Accuracy of Digital Impression Taking with Intraoral Scanners and Fabrication of CAD/CAM Posts and Cores in a Fully Digital Workflow
by: Robert Leven, et al.
Published: (2022-06-01)

Comparing the trueness of seven intraoral scanners and a physical impression on dentate human maxilla by a novel method
by: Zsolt Nagy, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01)