Inconsistency evaluation of the curriculum logical structure

Purpose of the study. The main purpose of creating a curriculum is to regulate academic disciplines in accordance with the logic of the learning process, defined by the relationship between the basic concepts of the disciplines. Violation of this logic becomes apparent only directly during the train...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu. D. Ageev, S. V. Fedoseev, Yu. A. Kavin, S. G. Vorona, I. S. Pavlovskiy
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Plekhanov Russian University of Economics 2018-11-01
Series:Статистика и экономика
Subjects:
Online Access:https://statecon.rea.ru/jour/article/view/1311
_version_ 1826559659278860288
author Yu. D. Ageev
S. V. Fedoseev
Yu. A. Kavin
S. G. Vorona
I. S. Pavlovskiy
author_facet Yu. D. Ageev
S. V. Fedoseev
Yu. A. Kavin
S. G. Vorona
I. S. Pavlovskiy
author_sort Yu. D. Ageev
collection DOAJ
description Purpose of the study. The main purpose of creating a curriculum is to regulate academic disciplines in accordance with the logic of the learning process, defined by the relationship between the basic concepts of the disciplines. Violation of this logic becomes apparent only directly during the training sessions.A large variety of quantitative methods uses indicators that do not reveal structural deficiencies in the curriculum. This makes it difficult to improve the curriculum.The purpose of this work is to demonstrate the application of a general approach to the assessment of the structural inconsistency of systems in relation to the evaluation of the logical structure of the curriculum.Materials and methods. The paper applies a general approach to the assessment of structural integrity, developed on the basis of the provisions of the general theory of systems and graph theory. The approach involves the construction of three interrelated structural models of the system and using them to determine the initial data for calculating the index of inconsistency of the system structure.Results. The overall approach to the assessment of structural integrity is adapted to assess the logical structure of the curriculum. Three models of curriculum structure are developed:Elementary model of interdisciplinary communication;Curriculum network model;Hierarchical curriculum model.Based on the parameters of the hierarchical curriculum model, using three adapted algorithms, the value of the inconsistency index of the curriculum structure in the direction of preparation “Applied Informatics” is calculated. Recommendations on changing the structure of the studied curriculum to reduce the degree of its structural inconsistency are proposed. Conclusion. As a result of the research, the methods were proposed that allow identifying possible contradictions in the structure of the curriculum and evaluating its inconsistency. As the experiments have shown, it is extremely difficult to study the curricula in a manual manner, the number of disciplines in which exceeds 50. In this regard, the development of a complex of computer programs that will automate the assessment of the inconsistency of large curricula is being completed.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T03:05:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5b6f5e78d6eb450dbdcac2e423455113
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2500-3925
language Russian
last_indexed 2025-03-14T09:03:54Z
publishDate 2018-11-01
publisher Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
record_format Article
series Статистика и экономика
spelling doaj.art-5b6f5e78d6eb450dbdcac2e4234551132025-03-02T12:41:02ZrusPlekhanov Russian University of EconomicsСтатистика и экономика2500-39252018-11-01155738010.21686/2500-3925-2018-5-73-801201Inconsistency evaluation of the curriculum logical structureYu. D. Ageev0S. V. Fedoseev1Yu. A. Kavin2S. G. Vorona3I. S. Pavlovskiy4Odintsovo Branch of Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of RussiaOdintsovo Branch of Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of RussiaOdintsovo Branch of Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of RussiaOdintsovo Branch of Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of RussiaOdintsovo Branch of Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of RussiaPurpose of the study. The main purpose of creating a curriculum is to regulate academic disciplines in accordance with the logic of the learning process, defined by the relationship between the basic concepts of the disciplines. Violation of this logic becomes apparent only directly during the training sessions.A large variety of quantitative methods uses indicators that do not reveal structural deficiencies in the curriculum. This makes it difficult to improve the curriculum.The purpose of this work is to demonstrate the application of a general approach to the assessment of the structural inconsistency of systems in relation to the evaluation of the logical structure of the curriculum.Materials and methods. The paper applies a general approach to the assessment of structural integrity, developed on the basis of the provisions of the general theory of systems and graph theory. The approach involves the construction of three interrelated structural models of the system and using them to determine the initial data for calculating the index of inconsistency of the system structure.Results. The overall approach to the assessment of structural integrity is adapted to assess the logical structure of the curriculum. Three models of curriculum structure are developed:Elementary model of interdisciplinary communication;Curriculum network model;Hierarchical curriculum model.Based on the parameters of the hierarchical curriculum model, using three adapted algorithms, the value of the inconsistency index of the curriculum structure in the direction of preparation “Applied Informatics” is calculated. Recommendations on changing the structure of the studied curriculum to reduce the degree of its structural inconsistency are proposed. Conclusion. As a result of the research, the methods were proposed that allow identifying possible contradictions in the structure of the curriculum and evaluating its inconsistency. As the experiments have shown, it is extremely difficult to study the curricula in a manual manner, the number of disciplines in which exceeds 50. In this regard, the development of a complex of computer programs that will automate the assessment of the inconsistency of large curricula is being completed.https://statecon.rea.ru/jour/article/view/1311integrated curriculaquantitative evaluation of curriculasystem approachgraph theoryinconsistency indicator
spellingShingle Yu. D. Ageev
S. V. Fedoseev
Yu. A. Kavin
S. G. Vorona
I. S. Pavlovskiy
Inconsistency evaluation of the curriculum logical structure
Статистика и экономика
integrated curricula
quantitative evaluation of curricula
system approach
graph theory
inconsistency indicator
title Inconsistency evaluation of the curriculum logical structure
title_full Inconsistency evaluation of the curriculum logical structure
title_fullStr Inconsistency evaluation of the curriculum logical structure
title_full_unstemmed Inconsistency evaluation of the curriculum logical structure
title_short Inconsistency evaluation of the curriculum logical structure
title_sort inconsistency evaluation of the curriculum logical structure
topic integrated curricula
quantitative evaluation of curricula
system approach
graph theory
inconsistency indicator
url https://statecon.rea.ru/jour/article/view/1311
work_keys_str_mv AT yudageev inconsistencyevaluationofthecurriculumlogicalstructure
AT svfedoseev inconsistencyevaluationofthecurriculumlogicalstructure
AT yuakavin inconsistencyevaluationofthecurriculumlogicalstructure
AT sgvorona inconsistencyevaluationofthecurriculumlogicalstructure
AT ispavlovskiy inconsistencyevaluationofthecurriculumlogicalstructure