Persistent symptoms after Covid-19: qualitative study of 114 “long Covid” patients and draft quality principles for services
Abstract Background Approximately 10% of patients with Covid-19 experience symptoms beyond 3–4 weeks. Patients call this “long Covid”. We sought to document such patients’ lived experience, including accessing and receiving healthcare and ideas for improving services. Methods We held 55 individual i...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-12-01
|
Series: | BMC Health Services Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-06001-y |
_version_ | 1818591155410960384 |
---|---|
author | Emma Ladds Alex Rushforth Sietse Wieringa Sharon Taylor Clare Rayner Laiba Husain Trisha Greenhalgh |
author_facet | Emma Ladds Alex Rushforth Sietse Wieringa Sharon Taylor Clare Rayner Laiba Husain Trisha Greenhalgh |
author_sort | Emma Ladds |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background Approximately 10% of patients with Covid-19 experience symptoms beyond 3–4 weeks. Patients call this “long Covid”. We sought to document such patients’ lived experience, including accessing and receiving healthcare and ideas for improving services. Methods We held 55 individual interviews and 8 focus groups (n = 59) with people recruited from UK-based long Covid patient support groups, social media and snowballing. We restricted some focus groups to health professionals since they had already self-organised into online communities. Participants were invited to tell their stories and comment on others’ stories. Data were audiotaped, transcribed, anonymised and coded using NVIVO. Analysis incorporated sociological theories of illness, healing, peer support, clinical relationships, access, and service redesign. Results Of 114 participants aged 27–73 years, 80 were female. Eighty-four were White British, 13 Asian, 8 White Other, 5 Black, and 4 mixed ethnicity. Thirty-two were doctors and 19 other health professionals. Thirty-one had attended hospital, of whom 8 had been admitted. Analysis revealed a confusing illness with many, varied and often relapsing-remitting symptoms and uncertain prognosis; a heavy sense of loss and stigma; difficulty accessing and navigating services; difficulty being taken seriously and achieving a diagnosis; disjointed and siloed care (including inability to access specialist services); variation in standards (e.g. inconsistent criteria for seeing, investigating and referring patients); variable quality of the therapeutic relationship (some participants felt well supported while others felt “fobbed off”); and possible critical events (e.g. deterioration after being unable to access services). Emotionally significant aspects of participants’ experiences informed ideas for improving services. Conclusion Suggested quality principles for a long Covid service include ensuring access to care, reducing burden of illness, taking clinical responsibility and providing continuity of care, multi-disciplinary rehabilitation, evidence-based investigation and management, and further development of the knowledge base and clinical services. Trial registration NCT04435041. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-16T10:07:56Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-5b7b7c4965a6480cbe813ce3c3cca901 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1472-6963 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-16T10:07:56Z |
publishDate | 2020-12-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | BMC Health Services Research |
spelling | doaj.art-5b7b7c4965a6480cbe813ce3c3cca9012022-12-21T22:35:38ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632020-12-0120111310.1186/s12913-020-06001-yPersistent symptoms after Covid-19: qualitative study of 114 “long Covid” patients and draft quality principles for servicesEmma Ladds0Alex Rushforth1Sietse Wieringa2Sharon Taylor3Clare Rayner4Laiba Husain5Trisha Greenhalgh6Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of OxfordNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of OxfordNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of OxfordCentral and North West London NHS Foundation TrustIndependent Occupational PhysicianNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of OxfordNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of OxfordAbstract Background Approximately 10% of patients with Covid-19 experience symptoms beyond 3–4 weeks. Patients call this “long Covid”. We sought to document such patients’ lived experience, including accessing and receiving healthcare and ideas for improving services. Methods We held 55 individual interviews and 8 focus groups (n = 59) with people recruited from UK-based long Covid patient support groups, social media and snowballing. We restricted some focus groups to health professionals since they had already self-organised into online communities. Participants were invited to tell their stories and comment on others’ stories. Data were audiotaped, transcribed, anonymised and coded using NVIVO. Analysis incorporated sociological theories of illness, healing, peer support, clinical relationships, access, and service redesign. Results Of 114 participants aged 27–73 years, 80 were female. Eighty-four were White British, 13 Asian, 8 White Other, 5 Black, and 4 mixed ethnicity. Thirty-two were doctors and 19 other health professionals. Thirty-one had attended hospital, of whom 8 had been admitted. Analysis revealed a confusing illness with many, varied and often relapsing-remitting symptoms and uncertain prognosis; a heavy sense of loss and stigma; difficulty accessing and navigating services; difficulty being taken seriously and achieving a diagnosis; disjointed and siloed care (including inability to access specialist services); variation in standards (e.g. inconsistent criteria for seeing, investigating and referring patients); variable quality of the therapeutic relationship (some participants felt well supported while others felt “fobbed off”); and possible critical events (e.g. deterioration after being unable to access services). Emotionally significant aspects of participants’ experiences informed ideas for improving services. Conclusion Suggested quality principles for a long Covid service include ensuring access to care, reducing burden of illness, taking clinical responsibility and providing continuity of care, multi-disciplinary rehabilitation, evidence-based investigation and management, and further development of the knowledge base and clinical services. Trial registration NCT04435041.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-06001-yPost-acute Covid-19Chronic Covid-19Long CovidQualitative studyQuality standards |
spellingShingle | Emma Ladds Alex Rushforth Sietse Wieringa Sharon Taylor Clare Rayner Laiba Husain Trisha Greenhalgh Persistent symptoms after Covid-19: qualitative study of 114 “long Covid” patients and draft quality principles for services BMC Health Services Research Post-acute Covid-19 Chronic Covid-19 Long Covid Qualitative study Quality standards |
title | Persistent symptoms after Covid-19: qualitative study of 114 “long Covid” patients and draft quality principles for services |
title_full | Persistent symptoms after Covid-19: qualitative study of 114 “long Covid” patients and draft quality principles for services |
title_fullStr | Persistent symptoms after Covid-19: qualitative study of 114 “long Covid” patients and draft quality principles for services |
title_full_unstemmed | Persistent symptoms after Covid-19: qualitative study of 114 “long Covid” patients and draft quality principles for services |
title_short | Persistent symptoms after Covid-19: qualitative study of 114 “long Covid” patients and draft quality principles for services |
title_sort | persistent symptoms after covid 19 qualitative study of 114 long covid patients and draft quality principles for services |
topic | Post-acute Covid-19 Chronic Covid-19 Long Covid Qualitative study Quality standards |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-06001-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT emmaladds persistentsymptomsaftercovid19qualitativestudyof114longcovidpatientsanddraftqualityprinciplesforservices AT alexrushforth persistentsymptomsaftercovid19qualitativestudyof114longcovidpatientsanddraftqualityprinciplesforservices AT sietsewieringa persistentsymptomsaftercovid19qualitativestudyof114longcovidpatientsanddraftqualityprinciplesforservices AT sharontaylor persistentsymptomsaftercovid19qualitativestudyof114longcovidpatientsanddraftqualityprinciplesforservices AT clarerayner persistentsymptomsaftercovid19qualitativestudyof114longcovidpatientsanddraftqualityprinciplesforservices AT laibahusain persistentsymptomsaftercovid19qualitativestudyof114longcovidpatientsanddraftqualityprinciplesforservices AT trishagreenhalgh persistentsymptomsaftercovid19qualitativestudyof114longcovidpatientsanddraftqualityprinciplesforservices |