Analysis and Design Aspects of Min-Type Switching Control Strategies for Synchronous Buck–Boost Converter
This paper presents a comparative study among switching control strategies for Buck–Boost converters, taking into account essential aspects in practical implementations, as the switching frequency variation concerning different output voltages and the responses in the transient and steady-states. Mo...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-03-01
|
Series: | Energies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/7/2302 |
_version_ | 1797439676109291520 |
---|---|
author | Julio Alves Mesquita da Silva Grace Silva Deaecto Tarcio Andre dos Santos Barros |
author_facet | Julio Alves Mesquita da Silva Grace Silva Deaecto Tarcio Andre dos Santos Barros |
author_sort | Julio Alves Mesquita da Silva |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This paper presents a comparative study among switching control strategies for Buck–Boost converters, taking into account essential aspects in practical implementations, as the switching frequency variation concerning different output voltages and the responses in the transient and steady-states. More specifically, we have considered three switching strategies of min-type, where two of them permit high switching frequencies, while the other considers a limited frequency control strategy. Moreover, we have generalized the control techniques available in the literature to make them able to operate under changes in the equilibrium points without the need for a redesign. A conventional PI controller based on pulse-width modulation (PWM) is adopted for comparison purposes. In contrast to PWM-based control, which operates in the maximum switching frequency, the min-type strategies present variation in the switching frequency that depends on the operation point and may lead to a power loss reduction when compared to conventional techniques. To assure zero-error operation in the steady-state, a correction method is proposed. Experimental tests were made to compare the transient and steady-state responses of these control methodologies, verify the variation of the switching frequency according to the output voltages and the robustness concerning load variations. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T11:56:31Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-5b847915080a4483a7db13ab2f5e4d7d |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1996-1073 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T11:56:31Z |
publishDate | 2022-03-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Energies |
spelling | doaj.art-5b847915080a4483a7db13ab2f5e4d7d2023-11-30T23:08:21ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732022-03-01157230210.3390/en15072302Analysis and Design Aspects of Min-Type Switching Control Strategies for Synchronous Buck–Boost ConverterJulio Alves Mesquita da Silva0Grace Silva Deaecto1Tarcio Andre dos Santos Barros2School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Campinas, São Paulo 13083-860, BrazilSchool of Mechanical Engineering, University of Campinas, São Paulo 13083-860, BrazilSchool of Mechanical Engineering, University of Campinas, São Paulo 13083-860, BrazilThis paper presents a comparative study among switching control strategies for Buck–Boost converters, taking into account essential aspects in practical implementations, as the switching frequency variation concerning different output voltages and the responses in the transient and steady-states. More specifically, we have considered three switching strategies of min-type, where two of them permit high switching frequencies, while the other considers a limited frequency control strategy. Moreover, we have generalized the control techniques available in the literature to make them able to operate under changes in the equilibrium points without the need for a redesign. A conventional PI controller based on pulse-width modulation (PWM) is adopted for comparison purposes. In contrast to PWM-based control, which operates in the maximum switching frequency, the min-type strategies present variation in the switching frequency that depends on the operation point and may lead to a power loss reduction when compared to conventional techniques. To assure zero-error operation in the steady-state, a correction method is proposed. Experimental tests were made to compare the transient and steady-state responses of these control methodologies, verify the variation of the switching frequency according to the output voltages and the robustness concerning load variations.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/7/2302DC–DC power convertersswitched systemspower electronicsrobust controlswitching frequency |
spellingShingle | Julio Alves Mesquita da Silva Grace Silva Deaecto Tarcio Andre dos Santos Barros Analysis and Design Aspects of Min-Type Switching Control Strategies for Synchronous Buck–Boost Converter Energies DC–DC power converters switched systems power electronics robust control switching frequency |
title | Analysis and Design Aspects of Min-Type Switching Control Strategies for Synchronous Buck–Boost Converter |
title_full | Analysis and Design Aspects of Min-Type Switching Control Strategies for Synchronous Buck–Boost Converter |
title_fullStr | Analysis and Design Aspects of Min-Type Switching Control Strategies for Synchronous Buck–Boost Converter |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis and Design Aspects of Min-Type Switching Control Strategies for Synchronous Buck–Boost Converter |
title_short | Analysis and Design Aspects of Min-Type Switching Control Strategies for Synchronous Buck–Boost Converter |
title_sort | analysis and design aspects of min type switching control strategies for synchronous buck boost converter |
topic | DC–DC power converters switched systems power electronics robust control switching frequency |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/7/2302 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT julioalvesmesquitadasilva analysisanddesignaspectsofmintypeswitchingcontrolstrategiesforsynchronousbuckboostconverter AT gracesilvadeaecto analysisanddesignaspectsofmintypeswitchingcontrolstrategiesforsynchronousbuckboostconverter AT tarcioandredossantosbarros analysisanddesignaspectsofmintypeswitchingcontrolstrategiesforsynchronousbuckboostconverter |