Analysis and Design Aspects of Min-Type Switching Control Strategies for Synchronous Buck–Boost Converter

This paper presents a comparative study among switching control strategies for Buck–Boost converters, taking into account essential aspects in practical implementations, as the switching frequency variation concerning different output voltages and the responses in the transient and steady-states. Mo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julio Alves Mesquita da Silva, Grace Silva Deaecto, Tarcio Andre dos Santos Barros
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-03-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/7/2302
_version_ 1797439676109291520
author Julio Alves Mesquita da Silva
Grace Silva Deaecto
Tarcio Andre dos Santos Barros
author_facet Julio Alves Mesquita da Silva
Grace Silva Deaecto
Tarcio Andre dos Santos Barros
author_sort Julio Alves Mesquita da Silva
collection DOAJ
description This paper presents a comparative study among switching control strategies for Buck–Boost converters, taking into account essential aspects in practical implementations, as the switching frequency variation concerning different output voltages and the responses in the transient and steady-states. More specifically, we have considered three switching strategies of min-type, where two of them permit high switching frequencies, while the other considers a limited frequency control strategy. Moreover, we have generalized the control techniques available in the literature to make them able to operate under changes in the equilibrium points without the need for a redesign. A conventional PI controller based on pulse-width modulation (PWM) is adopted for comparison purposes. In contrast to PWM-based control, which operates in the maximum switching frequency, the min-type strategies present variation in the switching frequency that depends on the operation point and may lead to a power loss reduction when compared to conventional techniques. To assure zero-error operation in the steady-state, a correction method is proposed. Experimental tests were made to compare the transient and steady-state responses of these control methodologies, verify the variation of the switching frequency according to the output voltages and the robustness concerning load variations.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T11:56:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5b847915080a4483a7db13ab2f5e4d7d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T11:56:31Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-5b847915080a4483a7db13ab2f5e4d7d2023-11-30T23:08:21ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732022-03-01157230210.3390/en15072302Analysis and Design Aspects of Min-Type Switching Control Strategies for Synchronous Buck–Boost ConverterJulio Alves Mesquita da Silva0Grace Silva Deaecto1Tarcio Andre dos Santos Barros2School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Campinas, São Paulo 13083-860, BrazilSchool of Mechanical Engineering, University of Campinas, São Paulo 13083-860, BrazilSchool of Mechanical Engineering, University of Campinas, São Paulo 13083-860, BrazilThis paper presents a comparative study among switching control strategies for Buck–Boost converters, taking into account essential aspects in practical implementations, as the switching frequency variation concerning different output voltages and the responses in the transient and steady-states. More specifically, we have considered three switching strategies of min-type, where two of them permit high switching frequencies, while the other considers a limited frequency control strategy. Moreover, we have generalized the control techniques available in the literature to make them able to operate under changes in the equilibrium points without the need for a redesign. A conventional PI controller based on pulse-width modulation (PWM) is adopted for comparison purposes. In contrast to PWM-based control, which operates in the maximum switching frequency, the min-type strategies present variation in the switching frequency that depends on the operation point and may lead to a power loss reduction when compared to conventional techniques. To assure zero-error operation in the steady-state, a correction method is proposed. Experimental tests were made to compare the transient and steady-state responses of these control methodologies, verify the variation of the switching frequency according to the output voltages and the robustness concerning load variations.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/7/2302DC–DC power convertersswitched systemspower electronicsrobust controlswitching frequency
spellingShingle Julio Alves Mesquita da Silva
Grace Silva Deaecto
Tarcio Andre dos Santos Barros
Analysis and Design Aspects of Min-Type Switching Control Strategies for Synchronous Buck–Boost Converter
Energies
DC–DC power converters
switched systems
power electronics
robust control
switching frequency
title Analysis and Design Aspects of Min-Type Switching Control Strategies for Synchronous Buck–Boost Converter
title_full Analysis and Design Aspects of Min-Type Switching Control Strategies for Synchronous Buck–Boost Converter
title_fullStr Analysis and Design Aspects of Min-Type Switching Control Strategies for Synchronous Buck–Boost Converter
title_full_unstemmed Analysis and Design Aspects of Min-Type Switching Control Strategies for Synchronous Buck–Boost Converter
title_short Analysis and Design Aspects of Min-Type Switching Control Strategies for Synchronous Buck–Boost Converter
title_sort analysis and design aspects of min type switching control strategies for synchronous buck boost converter
topic DC–DC power converters
switched systems
power electronics
robust control
switching frequency
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/7/2302
work_keys_str_mv AT julioalvesmesquitadasilva analysisanddesignaspectsofmintypeswitchingcontrolstrategiesforsynchronousbuckboostconverter
AT gracesilvadeaecto analysisanddesignaspectsofmintypeswitchingcontrolstrategiesforsynchronousbuckboostconverter
AT tarcioandredossantosbarros analysisanddesignaspectsofmintypeswitchingcontrolstrategiesforsynchronousbuckboostconverter