Factors associated with human tolerance of snakes in the southeastern United States

Conservation of snakes is influenced by humans’ beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors toward these often-maligned animals. We investigated public attitudes toward snakes through an online survey of undergraduate students (n = 743) at a large public university in a southeastern U.S. state. We used behavi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Audrey K. Vaughn, Lincoln R. Larson, M. Nils Peterson, Lara B. Pacifici
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Conservation Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcosc.2022.1016514/full
_version_ 1797997262552432640
author Audrey K. Vaughn
Lincoln R. Larson
M. Nils Peterson
Lara B. Pacifici
author_facet Audrey K. Vaughn
Lincoln R. Larson
M. Nils Peterson
Lara B. Pacifici
author_sort Audrey K. Vaughn
collection DOAJ
description Conservation of snakes is influenced by humans’ beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors toward these often-maligned animals. We investigated public attitudes toward snakes through an online survey of undergraduate students (n = 743) at a large public university in a southeastern U.S. state. We used behavioral intent (i.e., how a person would react if they encountered a snake) to assess tolerance of different snake species. We also examined various predictors of tolerance including demographic attributes and a variety of cognitive (e.g., knowledge, value orientations) and affective (e.g., emotions) social-psychological variables. Tolerance of snakes varied based on whether the snake was venomous or non-venomous: about 36% of students said they were likely to kill venomous snakes they encountered, compared with 9% who said they would kill non-venomous snakes and 21% of students who said they would kill snakes whose identity was uncertain. However, most students (54%) could not distinguish between venomous and non-venomous species. Value orientations and emotions were strong predictors of tolerance for snakes, suggesting snake outreach and management strategies should account for both cognitive and affective antecedents of behavior.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T10:29:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5b942257460e4352b4a4ed3778b2253c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-611X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T10:29:08Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Conservation Science
spelling doaj.art-5b942257460e4352b4a4ed3778b2253c2022-12-22T04:29:28ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Conservation Science2673-611X2022-10-01310.3389/fcosc.2022.10165141016514Factors associated with human tolerance of snakes in the southeastern United StatesAudrey K. Vaughn0Lincoln R. Larson1M. Nils Peterson2Lara B. Pacifici3Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United StatesDepartment of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism Management, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United StatesDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United StatesDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United StatesConservation of snakes is influenced by humans’ beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors toward these often-maligned animals. We investigated public attitudes toward snakes through an online survey of undergraduate students (n = 743) at a large public university in a southeastern U.S. state. We used behavioral intent (i.e., how a person would react if they encountered a snake) to assess tolerance of different snake species. We also examined various predictors of tolerance including demographic attributes and a variety of cognitive (e.g., knowledge, value orientations) and affective (e.g., emotions) social-psychological variables. Tolerance of snakes varied based on whether the snake was venomous or non-venomous: about 36% of students said they were likely to kill venomous snakes they encountered, compared with 9% who said they would kill non-venomous snakes and 21% of students who said they would kill snakes whose identity was uncertain. However, most students (54%) could not distinguish between venomous and non-venomous species. Value orientations and emotions were strong predictors of tolerance for snakes, suggesting snake outreach and management strategies should account for both cognitive and affective antecedents of behavior.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcosc.2022.1016514/fullattitudesbehaviorsemotionshuman-wildlife conflictknowledgereptiles
spellingShingle Audrey K. Vaughn
Lincoln R. Larson
M. Nils Peterson
Lara B. Pacifici
Factors associated with human tolerance of snakes in the southeastern United States
Frontiers in Conservation Science
attitudes
behaviors
emotions
human-wildlife conflict
knowledge
reptiles
title Factors associated with human tolerance of snakes in the southeastern United States
title_full Factors associated with human tolerance of snakes in the southeastern United States
title_fullStr Factors associated with human tolerance of snakes in the southeastern United States
title_full_unstemmed Factors associated with human tolerance of snakes in the southeastern United States
title_short Factors associated with human tolerance of snakes in the southeastern United States
title_sort factors associated with human tolerance of snakes in the southeastern united states
topic attitudes
behaviors
emotions
human-wildlife conflict
knowledge
reptiles
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcosc.2022.1016514/full
work_keys_str_mv AT audreykvaughn factorsassociatedwithhumantoleranceofsnakesinthesoutheasternunitedstates
AT lincolnrlarson factorsassociatedwithhumantoleranceofsnakesinthesoutheasternunitedstates
AT mnilspeterson factorsassociatedwithhumantoleranceofsnakesinthesoutheasternunitedstates
AT larabpacifici factorsassociatedwithhumantoleranceofsnakesinthesoutheasternunitedstates