Liaison psychiatry practitioners’ views on accessing aftercare and psychological therapies for patients who present to hospital following self-harm: multi-site interview study

Background Timely provision of aftercare following self-harm may reduce risks of repetition and premature death, but existing services are frequently reported as being inadequate. Aims To explore barriers and facilitators to accessing aftercare and psychological therapies for patients presenting to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leah Quinlivan, Louise Gorman, Stephen Marks, Elizabeth Monaghan, Sadika Asmal, Roger T. Webb, Nav Kapur
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2023-03-01
Series:BJPsych Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2056472423000029/type/journal_article
_version_ 1811156849331798016
author Leah Quinlivan
Louise Gorman
Stephen Marks
Elizabeth Monaghan
Sadika Asmal
Roger T. Webb
Nav Kapur
author_facet Leah Quinlivan
Louise Gorman
Stephen Marks
Elizabeth Monaghan
Sadika Asmal
Roger T. Webb
Nav Kapur
author_sort Leah Quinlivan
collection DOAJ
description Background Timely provision of aftercare following self-harm may reduce risks of repetition and premature death, but existing services are frequently reported as being inadequate. Aims To explore barriers and facilitators to accessing aftercare and psychological therapies for patients presenting to hospital following self-harm, from the perspective of liaison psychiatry practitioners. Method Between March 2019 and December 2020, we interviewed 51 staff members across 32 liaison psychiatry services in England. We used thematic analyses to interpret the interview data. Results Barriers to accessing services may heighten risk of further self-harm for patients and burnout for staff. Barriers included: perceived risk, exclusionary thresholds, long waiting times, siloed working and bureaucracy. Strategies to increase access to aftercare included: (a) improving assessments and care plans via input from skilled staff working in multidisciplinary teams (e.g. including social workers and clinical psychologists); (b) supporting staff to focus on assessments as therapeutic intervention; (c) probing boundaries and involving senior staff to negotiate risk and advocate for patients; and (d) building relationships and integration across services. Conclusions Our findings highlight practitioners’ views on barriers to accessing aftercare and strategies to circumvent some of these impediments. Provision of aftercare and psychological therapies as part of the liaison psychiatry service were deemed as an essential mechanism for optimising patient safety and experience and staff well-being. To close treatment gaps and reduce inequalities, it is important to work closely with staff and patients, learn from experiences of good practice and implement change more widely across services.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:57:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5bb1aea893fd4b36bd49de9dd41b823e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2056-4724
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:57:59Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series BJPsych Open
spelling doaj.art-5bb1aea893fd4b36bd49de9dd41b823e2023-03-09T12:29:29ZengCambridge University PressBJPsych Open2056-47242023-03-01910.1192/bjo.2023.2Liaison psychiatry practitioners’ views on accessing aftercare and psychological therapies for patients who present to hospital following self-harm: multi-site interview studyLeah Quinlivan0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3944-3613Louise Gorman1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6570-7272Stephen Marks2Elizabeth Monaghan3Sadika Asmal4Roger T. Webb5Nav Kapur6https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3100-3234Centre for Mental Health and Safety, University of Manchester, UK; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, UK; and National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, UKCentre for Mental Health and Safety, University of Manchester, UK; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, UK; and National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, UKDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Education, Manchester Metropolitan University, UKNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, UKNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, UKCentre for Mental Health and Safety, University of Manchester, UK; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, UK; and National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, UKCentre for Mental Health and Safety, University of Manchester, UK; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, UK; National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, UK; and Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UKBackground Timely provision of aftercare following self-harm may reduce risks of repetition and premature death, but existing services are frequently reported as being inadequate. Aims To explore barriers and facilitators to accessing aftercare and psychological therapies for patients presenting to hospital following self-harm, from the perspective of liaison psychiatry practitioners. Method Between March 2019 and December 2020, we interviewed 51 staff members across 32 liaison psychiatry services in England. We used thematic analyses to interpret the interview data. Results Barriers to accessing services may heighten risk of further self-harm for patients and burnout for staff. Barriers included: perceived risk, exclusionary thresholds, long waiting times, siloed working and bureaucracy. Strategies to increase access to aftercare included: (a) improving assessments and care plans via input from skilled staff working in multidisciplinary teams (e.g. including social workers and clinical psychologists); (b) supporting staff to focus on assessments as therapeutic intervention; (c) probing boundaries and involving senior staff to negotiate risk and advocate for patients; and (d) building relationships and integration across services. Conclusions Our findings highlight practitioners’ views on barriers to accessing aftercare and strategies to circumvent some of these impediments. Provision of aftercare and psychological therapies as part of the liaison psychiatry service were deemed as an essential mechanism for optimising patient safety and experience and staff well-being. To close treatment gaps and reduce inequalities, it is important to work closely with staff and patients, learn from experiences of good practice and implement change more widely across services. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2056472423000029/type/journal_articleSelf-harmhealth servicesliaison psychiatrystaff viewspsychological therapies
spellingShingle Leah Quinlivan
Louise Gorman
Stephen Marks
Elizabeth Monaghan
Sadika Asmal
Roger T. Webb
Nav Kapur
Liaison psychiatry practitioners’ views on accessing aftercare and psychological therapies for patients who present to hospital following self-harm: multi-site interview study
BJPsych Open
Self-harm
health services
liaison psychiatry
staff views
psychological therapies
title Liaison psychiatry practitioners’ views on accessing aftercare and psychological therapies for patients who present to hospital following self-harm: multi-site interview study
title_full Liaison psychiatry practitioners’ views on accessing aftercare and psychological therapies for patients who present to hospital following self-harm: multi-site interview study
title_fullStr Liaison psychiatry practitioners’ views on accessing aftercare and psychological therapies for patients who present to hospital following self-harm: multi-site interview study
title_full_unstemmed Liaison psychiatry practitioners’ views on accessing aftercare and psychological therapies for patients who present to hospital following self-harm: multi-site interview study
title_short Liaison psychiatry practitioners’ views on accessing aftercare and psychological therapies for patients who present to hospital following self-harm: multi-site interview study
title_sort liaison psychiatry practitioners views on accessing aftercare and psychological therapies for patients who present to hospital following self harm multi site interview study
topic Self-harm
health services
liaison psychiatry
staff views
psychological therapies
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2056472423000029/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT leahquinlivan liaisonpsychiatrypractitionersviewsonaccessingaftercareandpsychologicaltherapiesforpatientswhopresenttohospitalfollowingselfharmmultisiteinterviewstudy
AT louisegorman liaisonpsychiatrypractitionersviewsonaccessingaftercareandpsychologicaltherapiesforpatientswhopresenttohospitalfollowingselfharmmultisiteinterviewstudy
AT stephenmarks liaisonpsychiatrypractitionersviewsonaccessingaftercareandpsychologicaltherapiesforpatientswhopresenttohospitalfollowingselfharmmultisiteinterviewstudy
AT elizabethmonaghan liaisonpsychiatrypractitionersviewsonaccessingaftercareandpsychologicaltherapiesforpatientswhopresenttohospitalfollowingselfharmmultisiteinterviewstudy
AT sadikaasmal liaisonpsychiatrypractitionersviewsonaccessingaftercareandpsychologicaltherapiesforpatientswhopresenttohospitalfollowingselfharmmultisiteinterviewstudy
AT rogertwebb liaisonpsychiatrypractitionersviewsonaccessingaftercareandpsychologicaltherapiesforpatientswhopresenttohospitalfollowingselfharmmultisiteinterviewstudy
AT navkapur liaisonpsychiatrypractitionersviewsonaccessingaftercareandpsychologicaltherapiesforpatientswhopresenttohospitalfollowingselfharmmultisiteinterviewstudy