The effect of empirical and laboratory-confirmed tuberculosis on treatment outcomes

Abstract The World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for diagnosing and treating Tuberculosis (TB) includes clinical signs, therefore not requiring bacteriological laboratory confirmation. In resource-limited settings, including Kenya, this empirical TB treatment is routine practice however limited...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Osman Abdullahi, Ngari Moses, Deche Sanga, Willetts Annie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2021-07-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94153-0
_version_ 1819037451466833920
author Osman Abdullahi
Ngari Moses
Deche Sanga
Willetts Annie
author_facet Osman Abdullahi
Ngari Moses
Deche Sanga
Willetts Annie
author_sort Osman Abdullahi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for diagnosing and treating Tuberculosis (TB) includes clinical signs, therefore not requiring bacteriological laboratory confirmation. In resource-limited settings, including Kenya, this empirical TB treatment is routine practice however limited data exist on patient clinical outcomes when comparing the method of diagnosis. We evaluated TB treatment outcomes comparing clinically diagnosed and bacteriologically confirmed TB, 6 months after starting treatment of TB in a rural county in Kenya. Our analysis compared patients with a clinical versus a bacteriologically confirmed TB diagnosis. In this retrospective analysis, we included all adults (≥ 18 years) starting treatment of TB and followed up for 6 months, within the County TB surveillance database from 2012 to 2018. Patients included from both public and private facilities. The TB treatment outcomes assessed included treatment success, treatment failure, death, defaulted and transferred out. We used survival regression models to assess effect of type of diagnosis on TB treatment outcome defining time at risk from date of starting treatment to experiencing one of the treatment outcomes or completing 6-months of treatment. A total of 12,856 patients; median age 37 [IQR 28 − 50] years were included. 7639 (59%) were male while 11,339 (88%) were pulmonary TB cases. Overall, 11,633 (90%) were given first-line TB treatment and 3791 (29%) were HIV infected. 6472 (50%) of the patients were clinically diagnosed of whom 4521/6472 (70%) had a negative sputum/GeneXpert test. During the study 5565 person-years (PYs) observed, treatment success was 82% and 83% amongst clinically and bacteriologically diagnosed patients (P = 0.05). There were no significant differences in defaulting (P = 0.70) or transfer out (P = 0.19) between clinically and bacteriologically diagnosed patients. Mortality was significantly higher among clinically diagnosed patients: 639 (9.9%) deaths compared to 285 (4.5%) amongst the bacteriologically diagnosed patients; aHR 5.16 (95%CI 2.17 − 12.3) P < 0.001. Our study suggests survival during empirical TB treatment is significantly lower compared to patients with laboratory evidence, irrespective of HIV status and age. To improve TB treatment outcomes amongst clinically diagnosed patients, we recommend systematic screening for comorbidities, prompt diagnosis and management of other infections.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T08:21:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5bbc281d25cb4535b83efeeb550b8459
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T08:21:38Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-5bbc281d25cb4535b83efeeb550b84592022-12-21T19:10:25ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222021-07-0111111110.1038/s41598-021-94153-0The effect of empirical and laboratory-confirmed tuberculosis on treatment outcomesOsman Abdullahi0Ngari Moses1Deche Sanga2Willetts Annie3Department of Public Health, Pwani UniversityDepartment of Public Health, Pwani UniversityKilifi County TB Control ProgramDepartment of Public Health, Pwani UniversityAbstract The World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for diagnosing and treating Tuberculosis (TB) includes clinical signs, therefore not requiring bacteriological laboratory confirmation. In resource-limited settings, including Kenya, this empirical TB treatment is routine practice however limited data exist on patient clinical outcomes when comparing the method of diagnosis. We evaluated TB treatment outcomes comparing clinically diagnosed and bacteriologically confirmed TB, 6 months after starting treatment of TB in a rural county in Kenya. Our analysis compared patients with a clinical versus a bacteriologically confirmed TB diagnosis. In this retrospective analysis, we included all adults (≥ 18 years) starting treatment of TB and followed up for 6 months, within the County TB surveillance database from 2012 to 2018. Patients included from both public and private facilities. The TB treatment outcomes assessed included treatment success, treatment failure, death, defaulted and transferred out. We used survival regression models to assess effect of type of diagnosis on TB treatment outcome defining time at risk from date of starting treatment to experiencing one of the treatment outcomes or completing 6-months of treatment. A total of 12,856 patients; median age 37 [IQR 28 − 50] years were included. 7639 (59%) were male while 11,339 (88%) were pulmonary TB cases. Overall, 11,633 (90%) were given first-line TB treatment and 3791 (29%) were HIV infected. 6472 (50%) of the patients were clinically diagnosed of whom 4521/6472 (70%) had a negative sputum/GeneXpert test. During the study 5565 person-years (PYs) observed, treatment success was 82% and 83% amongst clinically and bacteriologically diagnosed patients (P = 0.05). There were no significant differences in defaulting (P = 0.70) or transfer out (P = 0.19) between clinically and bacteriologically diagnosed patients. Mortality was significantly higher among clinically diagnosed patients: 639 (9.9%) deaths compared to 285 (4.5%) amongst the bacteriologically diagnosed patients; aHR 5.16 (95%CI 2.17 − 12.3) P < 0.001. Our study suggests survival during empirical TB treatment is significantly lower compared to patients with laboratory evidence, irrespective of HIV status and age. To improve TB treatment outcomes amongst clinically diagnosed patients, we recommend systematic screening for comorbidities, prompt diagnosis and management of other infections.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94153-0
spellingShingle Osman Abdullahi
Ngari Moses
Deche Sanga
Willetts Annie
The effect of empirical and laboratory-confirmed tuberculosis on treatment outcomes
Scientific Reports
title The effect of empirical and laboratory-confirmed tuberculosis on treatment outcomes
title_full The effect of empirical and laboratory-confirmed tuberculosis on treatment outcomes
title_fullStr The effect of empirical and laboratory-confirmed tuberculosis on treatment outcomes
title_full_unstemmed The effect of empirical and laboratory-confirmed tuberculosis on treatment outcomes
title_short The effect of empirical and laboratory-confirmed tuberculosis on treatment outcomes
title_sort effect of empirical and laboratory confirmed tuberculosis on treatment outcomes
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94153-0
work_keys_str_mv AT osmanabdullahi theeffectofempiricalandlaboratoryconfirmedtuberculosisontreatmentoutcomes
AT ngarimoses theeffectofempiricalandlaboratoryconfirmedtuberculosisontreatmentoutcomes
AT dechesanga theeffectofempiricalandlaboratoryconfirmedtuberculosisontreatmentoutcomes
AT willettsannie theeffectofempiricalandlaboratoryconfirmedtuberculosisontreatmentoutcomes
AT osmanabdullahi effectofempiricalandlaboratoryconfirmedtuberculosisontreatmentoutcomes
AT ngarimoses effectofempiricalandlaboratoryconfirmedtuberculosisontreatmentoutcomes
AT dechesanga effectofempiricalandlaboratoryconfirmedtuberculosisontreatmentoutcomes
AT willettsannie effectofempiricalandlaboratoryconfirmedtuberculosisontreatmentoutcomes