Within study comparisons and risk of bias in international development: Systematic review and critical appraisal
Executive Summary Background Many systematic reviews incorporate nonrandomised studies of effects, sometimes called quasi‐experiments or natural experiments. However, the extent to which nonrandomised studies produce unbiased effect estimates is unclear in expectation or in practice. The usual way t...
Main Authors: | Paul Fenton Villar, Hugh Waddington |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2019-06-01
|
Series: | Campbell Systematic Reviews |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1027 |
Similar Items
-
Critical appraisal of qualitative research: necessity, partialities and the issue of bias
by: Williams, V, et al.
Published: (2019) -
Inflation bias: an appraisal
by: Helder Ferreira de Mendonça
Published: (2005-04-01) -
Developing critical appraisal of systematic reviews reporting network meta-analysis
by: Lee, A
Published: (2020) -
Risk prediction models for esophageal cancer: A systematic review and critical appraisal
by: He Li, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01) -
Critical Appraisal for Racial and Ethnic Equity in Clinical Prediction Models Extension: Development of a Critical Appraisal Tool Extension to Assess Racial and Ethnic Equity-Related Risk of Bias for Clinical Prediction Models
Published: (2023-11-01)