Dynamics of Soil Organic Carbon and CO<sub>2</sub> Flux under Cover Crop and No-Till Management in Soybean Cropping Systems of the Mid-South (USA)

The transition of natural landscapes to agricultural uses has resulted in severe loss of soil organic carbon, significantly contributing to CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and rising global temperatures. However, soil has the largest store of terrestrial carbon (C), a considerable sink and effe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexandra G. Firth, John P. Brooks, Martin A. Locke, Dana J. Morin, Ashli Brown, Beth H. Baker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-08-01
Series:Environments
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3298/9/9/109
_version_ 1797488573853728768
author Alexandra G. Firth
John P. Brooks
Martin A. Locke
Dana J. Morin
Ashli Brown
Beth H. Baker
author_facet Alexandra G. Firth
John P. Brooks
Martin A. Locke
Dana J. Morin
Ashli Brown
Beth H. Baker
author_sort Alexandra G. Firth
collection DOAJ
description The transition of natural landscapes to agricultural uses has resulted in severe loss of soil organic carbon, significantly contributing to CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and rising global temperatures. However, soil has the largest store of terrestrial carbon (C), a considerable sink and effective strategy for climate change mitigation if managed properly. Cover crops (CC) and no-till (NT) management are two management strategies that are known to increase percent organic carbon (%OC); however, adoption of these practices has been low in the mid-South due to lack of region-specific research and resistance to unproven practices. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the impacts of CC-NT treatments in soybean cropping systems on soil percent organic carbon (%OC) and CO<sub>2</sub> flux following long-term implementation. Results showed significantly greater %OC in NT (1.27% ± 0.03) than reduced till (RT; 1.10% ± 0.03; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and greater in both CC (rye: 1.23% ± 0.03, rye + clover: 1.22% ± 0.03) than no cover (1.11% ± 0.03; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Bacterial abundance (<i>p</i> = 0.005) and pH (<i>p</i> = 0.006) were significant predictors of %OC. There was no overall significant difference in CO<sub>2</sub> flux between tillage or CC treatments; however, there were significant differences between NT and RT in July of 2020 when %RH increased (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Bacterial abundance negatively impacted CO<sub>2</sub> flux (<i>p</i> < 0.05), which contradicts most studies. The rate of proportional change and pattern of variability in C pools suggested loss of %OC in RT treatments that were not apparent when considering %OC alone. The results of this study provide valuable insight into C turnover and the effectiveness of CC use in the Mid-South to increase soil C stocks.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T00:05:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5bdadf1ca491492bb4832c4ca21dbab2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3298
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T00:05:14Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Environments
spelling doaj.art-5bdadf1ca491492bb4832c4ca21dbab22023-11-23T16:09:44ZengMDPI AGEnvironments2076-32982022-08-019910910.3390/environments9090109Dynamics of Soil Organic Carbon and CO<sub>2</sub> Flux under Cover Crop and No-Till Management in Soybean Cropping Systems of the Mid-South (USA)Alexandra G. Firth0John P. Brooks1Martin A. Locke2Dana J. Morin3Ashli Brown4Beth H. Baker5Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USAUSDA-ARS, Genetics and Sustainable Agriculture Research Unit, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USAUSDA-ARS, National Sedimentation Laboratory, Oxford, MS 38655, USADepartment of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USADepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USADepartment of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USAThe transition of natural landscapes to agricultural uses has resulted in severe loss of soil organic carbon, significantly contributing to CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and rising global temperatures. However, soil has the largest store of terrestrial carbon (C), a considerable sink and effective strategy for climate change mitigation if managed properly. Cover crops (CC) and no-till (NT) management are two management strategies that are known to increase percent organic carbon (%OC); however, adoption of these practices has been low in the mid-South due to lack of region-specific research and resistance to unproven practices. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the impacts of CC-NT treatments in soybean cropping systems on soil percent organic carbon (%OC) and CO<sub>2</sub> flux following long-term implementation. Results showed significantly greater %OC in NT (1.27% ± 0.03) than reduced till (RT; 1.10% ± 0.03; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and greater in both CC (rye: 1.23% ± 0.03, rye + clover: 1.22% ± 0.03) than no cover (1.11% ± 0.03; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Bacterial abundance (<i>p</i> = 0.005) and pH (<i>p</i> = 0.006) were significant predictors of %OC. There was no overall significant difference in CO<sub>2</sub> flux between tillage or CC treatments; however, there were significant differences between NT and RT in July of 2020 when %RH increased (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Bacterial abundance negatively impacted CO<sub>2</sub> flux (<i>p</i> < 0.05), which contradicts most studies. The rate of proportional change and pattern of variability in C pools suggested loss of %OC in RT treatments that were not apparent when considering %OC alone. The results of this study provide valuable insight into C turnover and the effectiveness of CC use in the Mid-South to increase soil C stocks.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3298/9/9/109carbonno-tillcover cropssoil carbon sequestrationconservation agriculturecarbon measurement
spellingShingle Alexandra G. Firth
John P. Brooks
Martin A. Locke
Dana J. Morin
Ashli Brown
Beth H. Baker
Dynamics of Soil Organic Carbon and CO<sub>2</sub> Flux under Cover Crop and No-Till Management in Soybean Cropping Systems of the Mid-South (USA)
Environments
carbon
no-till
cover crops
soil carbon sequestration
conservation agriculture
carbon measurement
title Dynamics of Soil Organic Carbon and CO<sub>2</sub> Flux under Cover Crop and No-Till Management in Soybean Cropping Systems of the Mid-South (USA)
title_full Dynamics of Soil Organic Carbon and CO<sub>2</sub> Flux under Cover Crop and No-Till Management in Soybean Cropping Systems of the Mid-South (USA)
title_fullStr Dynamics of Soil Organic Carbon and CO<sub>2</sub> Flux under Cover Crop and No-Till Management in Soybean Cropping Systems of the Mid-South (USA)
title_full_unstemmed Dynamics of Soil Organic Carbon and CO<sub>2</sub> Flux under Cover Crop and No-Till Management in Soybean Cropping Systems of the Mid-South (USA)
title_short Dynamics of Soil Organic Carbon and CO<sub>2</sub> Flux under Cover Crop and No-Till Management in Soybean Cropping Systems of the Mid-South (USA)
title_sort dynamics of soil organic carbon and co sub 2 sub flux under cover crop and no till management in soybean cropping systems of the mid south usa
topic carbon
no-till
cover crops
soil carbon sequestration
conservation agriculture
carbon measurement
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3298/9/9/109
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandragfirth dynamicsofsoilorganiccarbonandcosub2subfluxundercovercropandnotillmanagementinsoybeancroppingsystemsofthemidsouthusa
AT johnpbrooks dynamicsofsoilorganiccarbonandcosub2subfluxundercovercropandnotillmanagementinsoybeancroppingsystemsofthemidsouthusa
AT martinalocke dynamicsofsoilorganiccarbonandcosub2subfluxundercovercropandnotillmanagementinsoybeancroppingsystemsofthemidsouthusa
AT danajmorin dynamicsofsoilorganiccarbonandcosub2subfluxundercovercropandnotillmanagementinsoybeancroppingsystemsofthemidsouthusa
AT ashlibrown dynamicsofsoilorganiccarbonandcosub2subfluxundercovercropandnotillmanagementinsoybeancroppingsystemsofthemidsouthusa
AT bethhbaker dynamicsofsoilorganiccarbonandcosub2subfluxundercovercropandnotillmanagementinsoybeancroppingsystemsofthemidsouthusa