Preliminary outcomes of allograft and hydroxyapatite as substitutes for autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with self-locking standalone cages

Abstract Purpose To investigate the efficacy and safety of allograft and hydroxyapatite (HA) as substitutes for autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods In this study, 49 patients (80 segments) treated with ACDF were included and allocated into three groups [group A, auto...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Changsheng Yang, Wentao Zhuo, Qingchu Li, Caiqiang Huang, Huibo Yan, Dadi Jin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-02-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02257-0
_version_ 1797999263322472448
author Changsheng Yang
Wentao Zhuo
Qingchu Li
Caiqiang Huang
Huibo Yan
Dadi Jin
author_facet Changsheng Yang
Wentao Zhuo
Qingchu Li
Caiqiang Huang
Huibo Yan
Dadi Jin
author_sort Changsheng Yang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Purpose To investigate the efficacy and safety of allograft and hydroxyapatite (HA) as substitutes for autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods In this study, 49 patients (80 segments) treated with ACDF were included and allocated into three groups [group A, autogenous iliac bone, n = 18; group B, allogeneic bone, n = 16; group C, HA, n = 15]. The clinical efficacy and fusion status were compared among each group. Complications were recorded in detail, and the Bazaz classification and Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) were used to detect dysphagia and dysphonia. Results Patients exhibited similar clinical efficacy among the groups during the final follow-up. All patients in groups A and B achieved fusion compared to only 73.3% of patients in group C. Groups A and B had similar fusion score, both of which greater than that of group C. No cage subsidence was observed in group A; however, 6.3% of patients in group B and 53.3% in group C had cage subsidence. Two patients in group A (11.1%) had persistent pain at the donor site. One patient in group B had dysphagia and dysphonia (6.3%), while one patient in group C had dysphonia (6.7%). Conclusion In ACDF, the autogenous iliac bone was the most ideal bone graft. The allogeneic bone was an acceptable substitute but risked cage subsidence and dysphagia. HA had a much lower fusion rate and a high risk of cage subsidence. Better substitutes should be further explored for ACDF.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T11:01:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5be01ddc346040f0930204099a4f47b9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1749-799X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T11:01:51Z
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
spelling doaj.art-5be01ddc346040f0930204099a4f47b92022-12-22T04:28:35ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2021-02-0116111110.1186/s13018-021-02257-0Preliminary outcomes of allograft and hydroxyapatite as substitutes for autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with self-locking standalone cagesChangsheng Yang0Wentao Zhuo1Qingchu Li2Caiqiang Huang3Huibo Yan4Dadi Jin5Department of Orthopedics, Academy of Orthopedics of Guangdong Province, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical UniversityDepartment of Orthopedics, Academy of Orthopedics of Guangdong Province, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical UniversityDepartment of Orthopedics, Academy of Orthopedics of Guangdong Province, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical UniversityDepartment of Orthopedics, Academy of Orthopedics of Guangdong Province, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical UniversityDepartment of Orthopedics, Academy of Orthopedics of Guangdong Province, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical UniversityDepartment of Orthopedics, Academy of Orthopedics of Guangdong Province, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical UniversityAbstract Purpose To investigate the efficacy and safety of allograft and hydroxyapatite (HA) as substitutes for autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods In this study, 49 patients (80 segments) treated with ACDF were included and allocated into three groups [group A, autogenous iliac bone, n = 18; group B, allogeneic bone, n = 16; group C, HA, n = 15]. The clinical efficacy and fusion status were compared among each group. Complications were recorded in detail, and the Bazaz classification and Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) were used to detect dysphagia and dysphonia. Results Patients exhibited similar clinical efficacy among the groups during the final follow-up. All patients in groups A and B achieved fusion compared to only 73.3% of patients in group C. Groups A and B had similar fusion score, both of which greater than that of group C. No cage subsidence was observed in group A; however, 6.3% of patients in group B and 53.3% in group C had cage subsidence. Two patients in group A (11.1%) had persistent pain at the donor site. One patient in group B had dysphagia and dysphonia (6.3%), while one patient in group C had dysphonia (6.7%). Conclusion In ACDF, the autogenous iliac bone was the most ideal bone graft. The allogeneic bone was an acceptable substitute but risked cage subsidence and dysphagia. HA had a much lower fusion rate and a high risk of cage subsidence. Better substitutes should be further explored for ACDF.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02257-0Anterior cervical discectomyFusionBone graftAllograftHydroxyapatite
spellingShingle Changsheng Yang
Wentao Zhuo
Qingchu Li
Caiqiang Huang
Huibo Yan
Dadi Jin
Preliminary outcomes of allograft and hydroxyapatite as substitutes for autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with self-locking standalone cages
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Anterior cervical discectomy
Fusion
Bone graft
Allograft
Hydroxyapatite
title Preliminary outcomes of allograft and hydroxyapatite as substitutes for autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with self-locking standalone cages
title_full Preliminary outcomes of allograft and hydroxyapatite as substitutes for autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with self-locking standalone cages
title_fullStr Preliminary outcomes of allograft and hydroxyapatite as substitutes for autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with self-locking standalone cages
title_full_unstemmed Preliminary outcomes of allograft and hydroxyapatite as substitutes for autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with self-locking standalone cages
title_short Preliminary outcomes of allograft and hydroxyapatite as substitutes for autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with self-locking standalone cages
title_sort preliminary outcomes of allograft and hydroxyapatite as substitutes for autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with self locking standalone cages
topic Anterior cervical discectomy
Fusion
Bone graft
Allograft
Hydroxyapatite
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02257-0
work_keys_str_mv AT changshengyang preliminaryoutcomesofallograftandhydroxyapatiteassubstitutesforautograftinanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionwithselflockingstandalonecages
AT wentaozhuo preliminaryoutcomesofallograftandhydroxyapatiteassubstitutesforautograftinanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionwithselflockingstandalonecages
AT qingchuli preliminaryoutcomesofallograftandhydroxyapatiteassubstitutesforautograftinanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionwithselflockingstandalonecages
AT caiqianghuang preliminaryoutcomesofallograftandhydroxyapatiteassubstitutesforautograftinanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionwithselflockingstandalonecages
AT huiboyan preliminaryoutcomesofallograftandhydroxyapatiteassubstitutesforautograftinanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionwithselflockingstandalonecages
AT dadijin preliminaryoutcomesofallograftandhydroxyapatiteassubstitutesforautograftinanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionwithselflockingstandalonecages