Retinal response to systemic inflammation differs between sexes and neurons

BackgroundNeurological dysfunction and glial activation are common in severe infections such as sepsis. There is a sexual dimorphism in the response to systemic inflammation in both patients and animal models, but there are few comparative studies. Here, we investigate the effect of systemic inflamm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kristy T. Rodríguez-Ramírez, María Norte-Muñoz, Fernando Lucas-Ruiz, Alejandro Gallego-Ortega, Francesco Calzaferri, David García-Bernal, Carlos M. Martínez, Caridad Galindo-Romero, Cristóbal de los Ríos, Manuel Vidal-Sanz, Marta Agudo-Barriuso
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Immunology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1340013/full
_version_ 1827356466916360192
author Kristy T. Rodríguez-Ramírez
María Norte-Muñoz
Fernando Lucas-Ruiz
Alejandro Gallego-Ortega
Francesco Calzaferri
David García-Bernal
Carlos M. Martínez
Caridad Galindo-Romero
Cristóbal de los Ríos
Cristóbal de los Ríos
Manuel Vidal-Sanz
Marta Agudo-Barriuso
author_facet Kristy T. Rodríguez-Ramírez
María Norte-Muñoz
Fernando Lucas-Ruiz
Alejandro Gallego-Ortega
Francesco Calzaferri
David García-Bernal
Carlos M. Martínez
Caridad Galindo-Romero
Cristóbal de los Ríos
Cristóbal de los Ríos
Manuel Vidal-Sanz
Marta Agudo-Barriuso
author_sort Kristy T. Rodríguez-Ramírez
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundNeurological dysfunction and glial activation are common in severe infections such as sepsis. There is a sexual dimorphism in the response to systemic inflammation in both patients and animal models, but there are few comparative studies. Here, we investigate the effect of systemic inflammation induced by intraperitoneal administration of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on the retina of male and female mice and determine whether antagonism of the NLRP3 inflammasome and the extrinsic pathway of apoptosis have protective effects on the retina.MethodsA single intraperitoneal injection of LPS (5 mg/kg) was administered to two months old C57BL/6J male and female mice. Retinas were examined longitudinally in vivo using electroretinography and spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Retinal ganglion cell (RGC) survival and microglial activation were analysed in flat-mounts. Retinal extracts were used for flow cytometric analysis of CD45 and CD11b positive cells. Matched plasma and retinal levels of proinflammatory cytokines were measured by ELISA. Retinal function and RGC survival were assessed in animals treated with P2X7R and TNFR1 antagonists alone or in combination.ResultsIn LPS-treated animals of both sexes, there was transient retinal dysfunction, loss of vision-forming but not non-vision forming RGCs, retinal swelling, microglial activation, cell infiltration, and increases in TNF and IL-1β. Compared to females, males showed higher vision-forming RGC death, slower functional recovery, and overexpression of lymphotoxin alpha in their retinas. P2X7R and TNFR1 antagonism, alone or in combination, rescued vision-forming RGCs. P2X7R antagonism also rescued retinal function. Response to treatment was better in females than in males.ConclusionsSystemic LPS has neuronal and sex-specific adverse effects in the mouse retina, which are counteracted by targeting the NLRP3 inflammasome and the extrinsic pathway of apoptosis. Our results highlight the need to analyse males and females in preclinical studies of inflammatory diseases affecting the central nervous system
first_indexed 2024-03-08T05:02:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5bea71dc8bc24dea91e20bde40d942b6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-3224
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T05:02:21Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Immunology
spelling doaj.art-5bea71dc8bc24dea91e20bde40d942b62024-02-07T10:52:29ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Immunology1664-32242024-02-011510.3389/fimmu.2024.13400131340013Retinal response to systemic inflammation differs between sexes and neuronsKristy T. Rodríguez-Ramírez0María Norte-Muñoz1Fernando Lucas-Ruiz2Alejandro Gallego-Ortega3Francesco Calzaferri4David García-Bernal5Carlos M. Martínez6Caridad Galindo-Romero7Cristóbal de los Ríos8Cristóbal de los Ríos9Manuel Vidal-Sanz10Marta Agudo-Barriuso11Grupo de Investigación Oftalmología Experimental, Departamento de Oftalmología, Optometría, Otorrinolaringología y Anatomía Patológica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Murcia, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, SpainGrupo de Investigación Oftalmología Experimental, Departamento de Oftalmología, Optometría, Otorrinolaringología y Anatomía Patológica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Murcia, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, SpainGrupo de Investigación Oftalmología Experimental, Departamento de Oftalmología, Optometría, Otorrinolaringología y Anatomía Patológica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Murcia, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, SpainGrupo de Investigación Oftalmología Experimental, Departamento de Oftalmología, Optometría, Otorrinolaringología y Anatomía Patológica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Murcia, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, SpainInstituto-Fundación Teófilo Hernando and Departamento de Farmacología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, SpainGrupo de Trasplante Hematopoyético y Terapia Celular, Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular B e Inmunología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Murcia, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, SpainPlataforma de Patología, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, SpainGrupo de Investigación Oftalmología Experimental, Departamento de Oftalmología, Optometría, Otorrinolaringología y Anatomía Patológica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Murcia, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, SpainInstituto-Fundación Teófilo Hernando and Departamento de Farmacología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, SpainDepartamento de Ciencias Básicas de la Salud, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, SpainGrupo de Investigación Oftalmología Experimental, Departamento de Oftalmología, Optometría, Otorrinolaringología y Anatomía Patológica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Murcia, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, SpainGrupo de Investigación Oftalmología Experimental, Departamento de Oftalmología, Optometría, Otorrinolaringología y Anatomía Patológica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Murcia, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, SpainBackgroundNeurological dysfunction and glial activation are common in severe infections such as sepsis. There is a sexual dimorphism in the response to systemic inflammation in both patients and animal models, but there are few comparative studies. Here, we investigate the effect of systemic inflammation induced by intraperitoneal administration of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on the retina of male and female mice and determine whether antagonism of the NLRP3 inflammasome and the extrinsic pathway of apoptosis have protective effects on the retina.MethodsA single intraperitoneal injection of LPS (5 mg/kg) was administered to two months old C57BL/6J male and female mice. Retinas were examined longitudinally in vivo using electroretinography and spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Retinal ganglion cell (RGC) survival and microglial activation were analysed in flat-mounts. Retinal extracts were used for flow cytometric analysis of CD45 and CD11b positive cells. Matched plasma and retinal levels of proinflammatory cytokines were measured by ELISA. Retinal function and RGC survival were assessed in animals treated with P2X7R and TNFR1 antagonists alone or in combination.ResultsIn LPS-treated animals of both sexes, there was transient retinal dysfunction, loss of vision-forming but not non-vision forming RGCs, retinal swelling, microglial activation, cell infiltration, and increases in TNF and IL-1β. Compared to females, males showed higher vision-forming RGC death, slower functional recovery, and overexpression of lymphotoxin alpha in their retinas. P2X7R and TNFR1 antagonism, alone or in combination, rescued vision-forming RGCs. P2X7R antagonism also rescued retinal function. Response to treatment was better in females than in males.ConclusionsSystemic LPS has neuronal and sex-specific adverse effects in the mouse retina, which are counteracted by targeting the NLRP3 inflammasome and the extrinsic pathway of apoptosis. Our results highlight the need to analyse males and females in preclinical studies of inflammatory diseases affecting the central nervous systemhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1340013/fullmalefemalelipopolysaccharideinflammationcentral nervous systemneuronal death
spellingShingle Kristy T. Rodríguez-Ramírez
María Norte-Muñoz
Fernando Lucas-Ruiz
Alejandro Gallego-Ortega
Francesco Calzaferri
David García-Bernal
Carlos M. Martínez
Caridad Galindo-Romero
Cristóbal de los Ríos
Cristóbal de los Ríos
Manuel Vidal-Sanz
Marta Agudo-Barriuso
Retinal response to systemic inflammation differs between sexes and neurons
Frontiers in Immunology
male
female
lipopolysaccharide
inflammation
central nervous system
neuronal death
title Retinal response to systemic inflammation differs between sexes and neurons
title_full Retinal response to systemic inflammation differs between sexes and neurons
title_fullStr Retinal response to systemic inflammation differs between sexes and neurons
title_full_unstemmed Retinal response to systemic inflammation differs between sexes and neurons
title_short Retinal response to systemic inflammation differs between sexes and neurons
title_sort retinal response to systemic inflammation differs between sexes and neurons
topic male
female
lipopolysaccharide
inflammation
central nervous system
neuronal death
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1340013/full
work_keys_str_mv AT kristytrodriguezramirez retinalresponsetosystemicinflammationdiffersbetweensexesandneurons
AT marianortemunoz retinalresponsetosystemicinflammationdiffersbetweensexesandneurons
AT fernandolucasruiz retinalresponsetosystemicinflammationdiffersbetweensexesandneurons
AT alejandrogallegoortega retinalresponsetosystemicinflammationdiffersbetweensexesandneurons
AT francescocalzaferri retinalresponsetosystemicinflammationdiffersbetweensexesandneurons
AT davidgarciabernal retinalresponsetosystemicinflammationdiffersbetweensexesandneurons
AT carlosmmartinez retinalresponsetosystemicinflammationdiffersbetweensexesandneurons
AT caridadgalindoromero retinalresponsetosystemicinflammationdiffersbetweensexesandneurons
AT cristobaldelosrios retinalresponsetosystemicinflammationdiffersbetweensexesandneurons
AT cristobaldelosrios retinalresponsetosystemicinflammationdiffersbetweensexesandneurons
AT manuelvidalsanz retinalresponsetosystemicinflammationdiffersbetweensexesandneurons
AT martaagudobarriuso retinalresponsetosystemicinflammationdiffersbetweensexesandneurons