The Validity of a New Low-Dose Stereoradiography System to Perform 2D and 3D Knee Prosthetic Alignment Measurements.

INTRODUCTION:The EOS stereoradiography system has shown to provide reliable varus/valgus (VV) measurements of the lower limb in 2D (VV2D) and 3D (VV3D) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Validity of these measurements has not been investigated yet, therefore the purpose of this study was to determ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marrigje F Meijer, Ton Velleman, Alexander L Boerboom, Sjoerd K Bulstra, Egbert Otten, Martin Stevens, Inge H F Reininga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4714906?pdf=render
_version_ 1811330645284093952
author Marrigje F Meijer
Ton Velleman
Alexander L Boerboom
Sjoerd K Bulstra
Egbert Otten
Martin Stevens
Inge H F Reininga
author_facet Marrigje F Meijer
Ton Velleman
Alexander L Boerboom
Sjoerd K Bulstra
Egbert Otten
Martin Stevens
Inge H F Reininga
author_sort Marrigje F Meijer
collection DOAJ
description INTRODUCTION:The EOS stereoradiography system has shown to provide reliable varus/valgus (VV) measurements of the lower limb in 2D (VV2D) and 3D (VV3D) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Validity of these measurements has not been investigated yet, therefore the purpose of this study was to determine validity of EOS VV2D and VV3D. METHODS:EOS images were made of a lower limb phantom containing a knee prosthesis, while varying VV angle from 15° varus to 15° valgus and flexion angle from 0° to 20°, and changing rotation from 20° internal to 20° external rotation. Differences between the actual VV position of the lower limb phantom and its position as measured on EOS 2D and 3D images were investigated. RESULTS:Rotation, flexion or VV angle alone had no major impact on VV2D or VV3D. Combination of VV angle and rotation with full extension did not show major differences in VV2D measurements either. Combination of flexion and rotation with a neutral VV angle showed variation of up to 7.4° for VV2D; maximum variation for VV3D was only 1.5°. A combination of the three variables showed an even greater distortion of VV2D, while VV3D stayed relatively constant. Maximum measurement difference between preset VV angle and VV2D was 9.8°, while the difference with VV3D was only 1.9°. The largest differences between the preset VV angle and VV2D were found when installing the leg in extreme angles, for example 15° valgus, 20° flexion and 20° internal rotation. CONCLUSIONS:After TKA, EOS VV3D were more valid than VV2D, indicating that 3D measurements compensate for malpositioning during acquisition. Caution is warranted when measuring VV angle on a conventional radiograph of a knee with a flexion contracture, varus or valgus angle and/or rotation of the knee joint during acquisition.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T16:06:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5bf40fefd5cd4c18b4c29653b242b2fa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T16:06:46Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-5bf40fefd5cd4c18b4c29653b242b2fa2022-12-22T02:40:22ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01111e014618710.1371/journal.pone.0146187The Validity of a New Low-Dose Stereoradiography System to Perform 2D and 3D Knee Prosthetic Alignment Measurements.Marrigje F MeijerTon VellemanAlexander L BoerboomSjoerd K BulstraEgbert OttenMartin StevensInge H F ReiningaINTRODUCTION:The EOS stereoradiography system has shown to provide reliable varus/valgus (VV) measurements of the lower limb in 2D (VV2D) and 3D (VV3D) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Validity of these measurements has not been investigated yet, therefore the purpose of this study was to determine validity of EOS VV2D and VV3D. METHODS:EOS images were made of a lower limb phantom containing a knee prosthesis, while varying VV angle from 15° varus to 15° valgus and flexion angle from 0° to 20°, and changing rotation from 20° internal to 20° external rotation. Differences between the actual VV position of the lower limb phantom and its position as measured on EOS 2D and 3D images were investigated. RESULTS:Rotation, flexion or VV angle alone had no major impact on VV2D or VV3D. Combination of VV angle and rotation with full extension did not show major differences in VV2D measurements either. Combination of flexion and rotation with a neutral VV angle showed variation of up to 7.4° for VV2D; maximum variation for VV3D was only 1.5°. A combination of the three variables showed an even greater distortion of VV2D, while VV3D stayed relatively constant. Maximum measurement difference between preset VV angle and VV2D was 9.8°, while the difference with VV3D was only 1.9°. The largest differences between the preset VV angle and VV2D were found when installing the leg in extreme angles, for example 15° valgus, 20° flexion and 20° internal rotation. CONCLUSIONS:After TKA, EOS VV3D were more valid than VV2D, indicating that 3D measurements compensate for malpositioning during acquisition. Caution is warranted when measuring VV angle on a conventional radiograph of a knee with a flexion contracture, varus or valgus angle and/or rotation of the knee joint during acquisition.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4714906?pdf=render
spellingShingle Marrigje F Meijer
Ton Velleman
Alexander L Boerboom
Sjoerd K Bulstra
Egbert Otten
Martin Stevens
Inge H F Reininga
The Validity of a New Low-Dose Stereoradiography System to Perform 2D and 3D Knee Prosthetic Alignment Measurements.
PLoS ONE
title The Validity of a New Low-Dose Stereoradiography System to Perform 2D and 3D Knee Prosthetic Alignment Measurements.
title_full The Validity of a New Low-Dose Stereoradiography System to Perform 2D and 3D Knee Prosthetic Alignment Measurements.
title_fullStr The Validity of a New Low-Dose Stereoradiography System to Perform 2D and 3D Knee Prosthetic Alignment Measurements.
title_full_unstemmed The Validity of a New Low-Dose Stereoradiography System to Perform 2D and 3D Knee Prosthetic Alignment Measurements.
title_short The Validity of a New Low-Dose Stereoradiography System to Perform 2D and 3D Knee Prosthetic Alignment Measurements.
title_sort validity of a new low dose stereoradiography system to perform 2d and 3d knee prosthetic alignment measurements
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4714906?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT marrigjefmeijer thevalidityofanewlowdosestereoradiographysystemtoperform2dand3dkneeprostheticalignmentmeasurements
AT tonvelleman thevalidityofanewlowdosestereoradiographysystemtoperform2dand3dkneeprostheticalignmentmeasurements
AT alexanderlboerboom thevalidityofanewlowdosestereoradiographysystemtoperform2dand3dkneeprostheticalignmentmeasurements
AT sjoerdkbulstra thevalidityofanewlowdosestereoradiographysystemtoperform2dand3dkneeprostheticalignmentmeasurements
AT egbertotten thevalidityofanewlowdosestereoradiographysystemtoperform2dand3dkneeprostheticalignmentmeasurements
AT martinstevens thevalidityofanewlowdosestereoradiographysystemtoperform2dand3dkneeprostheticalignmentmeasurements
AT ingehfreininga thevalidityofanewlowdosestereoradiographysystemtoperform2dand3dkneeprostheticalignmentmeasurements
AT marrigjefmeijer validityofanewlowdosestereoradiographysystemtoperform2dand3dkneeprostheticalignmentmeasurements
AT tonvelleman validityofanewlowdosestereoradiographysystemtoperform2dand3dkneeprostheticalignmentmeasurements
AT alexanderlboerboom validityofanewlowdosestereoradiographysystemtoperform2dand3dkneeprostheticalignmentmeasurements
AT sjoerdkbulstra validityofanewlowdosestereoradiographysystemtoperform2dand3dkneeprostheticalignmentmeasurements
AT egbertotten validityofanewlowdosestereoradiographysystemtoperform2dand3dkneeprostheticalignmentmeasurements
AT martinstevens validityofanewlowdosestereoradiographysystemtoperform2dand3dkneeprostheticalignmentmeasurements
AT ingehfreininga validityofanewlowdosestereoradiographysystemtoperform2dand3dkneeprostheticalignmentmeasurements