Estimating Distances from Parallaxes. VI. A Method for Inferring Distances and Transverse Velocities from Parallaxes and Proper Motions Demonstrated on Gaia Data Release 3

The accuracy of stellar distances inferred purely from parallaxes degrades rapidly with distance. Proper motion measurements, when combined with some idea of typical velocities, provide independent information on stellar distances. Here, I build a direction- and distance-dependent model of the distr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: C. A. L. Bailer-Jones
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2023-01-01
Series:The Astronomical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ad08bb
_version_ 1797450030533050368
author C. A. L. Bailer-Jones
author_facet C. A. L. Bailer-Jones
author_sort C. A. L. Bailer-Jones
collection DOAJ
description The accuracy of stellar distances inferred purely from parallaxes degrades rapidly with distance. Proper motion measurements, when combined with some idea of typical velocities, provide independent information on stellar distances. Here, I build a direction- and distance-dependent model of the distribution of stellar velocities in the Galaxy, then use this together with parallaxes and proper motions to infer kinegeometric distances and transverse velocities for stars in Gaia DR3. Using noisy simulations, I assess the performance of the method and compare its accuracy to purely parallax-based (geometric) distances. Over the whole Gaia catalog, kinegeometric distances are on average 1.25 times more accurate than geometric ones. This average masks a large variation in the relative performance, however. Kinegeometric distances are considerably better than geometric ones beyond several kpc, for example. On average, kinegeometric distances can be measured to an accuracy of 19% and velocities ( $\sqrt{{v}_{\alpha * }^{2}+{v}_{\delta }^{2}}$ ) to 16 km s ^−1 (median absolute deviations). In Gaia DR3, kinegeometric distances are smaller than geometric ones on average for distant stars, but the pattern is more complex in the bulge and disk. With the much more accurate proper motions expected in Gaia DR5, a further improvement in the distance accuracy by a factor of (only) 1.35 on average is predicted (with kinegeometric distances still 1.25 times more accurate than geometric ones). The improvement attained from proper motions is limited by the width of the velocity prior, in a way that the improvement from better parallaxes is not limited by the width of the distance prior.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T14:34:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5bf75b27e87e438eb3dab5bac9079770
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1538-3881
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T14:34:36Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series The Astronomical Journal
spelling doaj.art-5bf75b27e87e438eb3dab5bac90797702023-11-27T14:57:42ZengIOP PublishingThe Astronomical Journal1538-38812023-01-01166626910.3847/1538-3881/ad08bbEstimating Distances from Parallaxes. VI. A Method for Inferring Distances and Transverse Velocities from Parallaxes and Proper Motions Demonstrated on Gaia Data Release 3C. A. L. Bailer-Jones0Max Planck Institute for Astronomy , Heidelberg, GermanyThe accuracy of stellar distances inferred purely from parallaxes degrades rapidly with distance. Proper motion measurements, when combined with some idea of typical velocities, provide independent information on stellar distances. Here, I build a direction- and distance-dependent model of the distribution of stellar velocities in the Galaxy, then use this together with parallaxes and proper motions to infer kinegeometric distances and transverse velocities for stars in Gaia DR3. Using noisy simulations, I assess the performance of the method and compare its accuracy to purely parallax-based (geometric) distances. Over the whole Gaia catalog, kinegeometric distances are on average 1.25 times more accurate than geometric ones. This average masks a large variation in the relative performance, however. Kinegeometric distances are considerably better than geometric ones beyond several kpc, for example. On average, kinegeometric distances can be measured to an accuracy of 19% and velocities ( $\sqrt{{v}_{\alpha * }^{2}+{v}_{\delta }^{2}}$ ) to 16 km s ^−1 (median absolute deviations). In Gaia DR3, kinegeometric distances are smaller than geometric ones on average for distant stars, but the pattern is more complex in the bulge and disk. With the much more accurate proper motions expected in Gaia DR5, a further improvement in the distance accuracy by a factor of (only) 1.35 on average is predicted (with kinegeometric distances still 1.25 times more accurate than geometric ones). The improvement attained from proper motions is limited by the width of the velocity prior, in a way that the improvement from better parallaxes is not limited by the width of the distance prior.https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ad08bbCatalogsBayesian statisticsDistance indicatorsStellar distanceStellar motionAstrometry
spellingShingle C. A. L. Bailer-Jones
Estimating Distances from Parallaxes. VI. A Method for Inferring Distances and Transverse Velocities from Parallaxes and Proper Motions Demonstrated on Gaia Data Release 3
The Astronomical Journal
Catalogs
Bayesian statistics
Distance indicators
Stellar distance
Stellar motion
Astrometry
title Estimating Distances from Parallaxes. VI. A Method for Inferring Distances and Transverse Velocities from Parallaxes and Proper Motions Demonstrated on Gaia Data Release 3
title_full Estimating Distances from Parallaxes. VI. A Method for Inferring Distances and Transverse Velocities from Parallaxes and Proper Motions Demonstrated on Gaia Data Release 3
title_fullStr Estimating Distances from Parallaxes. VI. A Method for Inferring Distances and Transverse Velocities from Parallaxes and Proper Motions Demonstrated on Gaia Data Release 3
title_full_unstemmed Estimating Distances from Parallaxes. VI. A Method for Inferring Distances and Transverse Velocities from Parallaxes and Proper Motions Demonstrated on Gaia Data Release 3
title_short Estimating Distances from Parallaxes. VI. A Method for Inferring Distances and Transverse Velocities from Parallaxes and Proper Motions Demonstrated on Gaia Data Release 3
title_sort estimating distances from parallaxes vi a method for inferring distances and transverse velocities from parallaxes and proper motions demonstrated on gaia data release 3
topic Catalogs
Bayesian statistics
Distance indicators
Stellar distance
Stellar motion
Astrometry
url https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ad08bb
work_keys_str_mv AT calbailerjones estimatingdistancesfromparallaxesviamethodforinferringdistancesandtransversevelocitiesfromparallaxesandpropermotionsdemonstratedongaiadatarelease3