High-Fidelity Fin–Actuator System Modeling and Aeroelastic Analysis Considering Friction Effect
Both the dynamic characteristics and structural nonlinearities of an actuator will affect the flutter boundary of a fin–actuator system. The actuator models used in past research are not universal, the accuracy is difficult to guarantee, and the consideration of nonlinearity is not adequate. Based o...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Applied Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/7/3057 |
_version_ | 1797539612901507072 |
---|---|
author | Jin Lu Zhigang Wu Chao Yang |
author_facet | Jin Lu Zhigang Wu Chao Yang |
author_sort | Jin Lu |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Both the dynamic characteristics and structural nonlinearities of an actuator will affect the flutter boundary of a fin–actuator system. The actuator models used in past research are not universal, the accuracy is difficult to guarantee, and the consideration of nonlinearity is not adequate. Based on modularization, a high-fidelity modeling method for an actuator is proposed in this paper. This model considers both freeplay and friction, which is easy to expand. It can be directly used to analyze actuator characteristics and perform aeroelastic analysis of fin–actuator systems. Friction can improve the aeroelastic stability, but the mechanism of its influence on the aeroelastic characteristics of the system has not been reported. In this paper, the LuGre model, which can better reflect the friction characteristics, was integrated into the actuator. The influence of the initial condition, freeplay, and friction on the aeroelastic characteristics of the system was analyzed. The comparison of the results with the previous research shows that oversimplified friction models are not accurate enough to reflect the mechanism of friction’s influence. By changing the loads, material, and geometry of contact surfaces, flutter can be effectively suppressed, and the power loss caused by friction can be minimized. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T12:48:20Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-5c134577e54845d7bd677ee901a25ddf |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2076-3417 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-10T12:48:20Z |
publishDate | 2021-03-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Applied Sciences |
spelling | doaj.art-5c134577e54845d7bd677ee901a25ddf2023-11-21T13:18:17ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172021-03-01117305710.3390/app11073057High-Fidelity Fin–Actuator System Modeling and Aeroelastic Analysis Considering Friction EffectJin Lu0Zhigang Wu1Chao Yang2School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, ChinaSchool of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, ChinaSchool of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, ChinaBoth the dynamic characteristics and structural nonlinearities of an actuator will affect the flutter boundary of a fin–actuator system. The actuator models used in past research are not universal, the accuracy is difficult to guarantee, and the consideration of nonlinearity is not adequate. Based on modularization, a high-fidelity modeling method for an actuator is proposed in this paper. This model considers both freeplay and friction, which is easy to expand. It can be directly used to analyze actuator characteristics and perform aeroelastic analysis of fin–actuator systems. Friction can improve the aeroelastic stability, but the mechanism of its influence on the aeroelastic characteristics of the system has not been reported. In this paper, the LuGre model, which can better reflect the friction characteristics, was integrated into the actuator. The influence of the initial condition, freeplay, and friction on the aeroelastic characteristics of the system was analyzed. The comparison of the results with the previous research shows that oversimplified friction models are not accurate enough to reflect the mechanism of friction’s influence. By changing the loads, material, and geometry of contact surfaces, flutter can be effectively suppressed, and the power loss caused by friction can be minimized.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/7/3057freeplayfrictionactuatordynamic stiffnessaeroelasticitynonlinerity |
spellingShingle | Jin Lu Zhigang Wu Chao Yang High-Fidelity Fin–Actuator System Modeling and Aeroelastic Analysis Considering Friction Effect Applied Sciences freeplay friction actuator dynamic stiffness aeroelasticity nonlinerity |
title | High-Fidelity Fin–Actuator System Modeling and Aeroelastic Analysis Considering Friction Effect |
title_full | High-Fidelity Fin–Actuator System Modeling and Aeroelastic Analysis Considering Friction Effect |
title_fullStr | High-Fidelity Fin–Actuator System Modeling and Aeroelastic Analysis Considering Friction Effect |
title_full_unstemmed | High-Fidelity Fin–Actuator System Modeling and Aeroelastic Analysis Considering Friction Effect |
title_short | High-Fidelity Fin–Actuator System Modeling and Aeroelastic Analysis Considering Friction Effect |
title_sort | high fidelity fin actuator system modeling and aeroelastic analysis considering friction effect |
topic | freeplay friction actuator dynamic stiffness aeroelasticity nonlinerity |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/7/3057 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jinlu highfidelityfinactuatorsystemmodelingandaeroelasticanalysisconsideringfrictioneffect AT zhigangwu highfidelityfinactuatorsystemmodelingandaeroelasticanalysisconsideringfrictioneffect AT chaoyang highfidelityfinactuatorsystemmodelingandaeroelasticanalysisconsideringfrictioneffect |