Instrumental and clinical diagnosis of interdigital Morton neuroma

Background: Interdigital neuroma is one of the most common diseases in foot surgery. It is a common cause of metatarsalgia leading to debilitating pain. At the same time, the diagnosis of neuroma can be a difficult task for an orthopedic surgeon due to the complex anatomy of the forefoot and a large...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daria A. Bolshakova, Andrey A. Kardanov, Musa N. Maysigov, Alexander А. Akhpashev, Dmitriy O. Ilyin, Andrey V. Korolev
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Eco-vector 2024-01-01
Series:Клиническая практика
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.eco-vector.com/clinpractice/article/viewFile/456429/pdf
_version_ 1797261502594416640
author Daria A. Bolshakova
Andrey A. Kardanov
Musa N. Maysigov
Alexander А. Akhpashev
Dmitriy O. Ilyin
Andrey V. Korolev
author_facet Daria A. Bolshakova
Andrey A. Kardanov
Musa N. Maysigov
Alexander А. Akhpashev
Dmitriy O. Ilyin
Andrey V. Korolev
author_sort Daria A. Bolshakova
collection DOAJ
description Background: Interdigital neuroma is one of the most common diseases in foot surgery. It is a common cause of metatarsalgia leading to debilitating pain. At the same time, the diagnosis of neuroma can be a difficult task for an orthopedic surgeon due to the complex anatomy of the forefoot and a large number of soft-tissue and bone structures. Besides, the existing manual testing methods are not pathognomonic specifically for neuroma. The clinical symptoms and history, as well as a physical exam and instrumental evidence are important in assessing and grading the disease. However, there are no recommendations in the modern Russian literature regarding the need for routine visualization of neuroma. The reproducibility of the study, the absence of ionizing radiation and the possibility of obtaining a second opinion, as well as high sensitivity makes magnetic resonance imaging an important diagnostic tool in the diagnosis of neuroma. Aim: To evaluate the importance of the anamnesis and complaints and the sensitivity of clinical tests and magnetic resonance imaging of the foot in the diagnosis of interdigital neuromas. Methods: The study presents a retrospective analysis of the medical histories and outpatient records of 28 patients (8 men and 20 women) treated at the EMC ECSTO in the period from 2017 to 2022. The examination was performed according to a standardized protocol: collection of complaints and anamnesis, palpation, manual testing, including Mulder's click test. As a part of examination, magnetic resonance imaging of the foot was performed for all the patients. The average patient’s age at the time of the surgical treatment was 45 years. The resection of a part of the affected nerve with the subsequent histological examination was considered a gold standard for the treatment and verification of interdigital neuromas. In all the cases, the histopathological study confirmed the diagnosis. Results: The sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of interdigital neuromas was 86%, the sensitivity of the Mulder test was 61%. Pain during the palpation of the affected interdigital space was determined in 100% of cases. Conclusion: The combination of a manual examination and magnetic resonance imaging, along with the analysis of complaints and anamnesis makes it possible to diagnose Morton's neuroma in most cases.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T23:42:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5c2b1b058f1849ca97f2e7a75ce8c1c8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2220-3095
2618-8627
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T23:42:14Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Eco-vector
record_format Article
series Клиническая практика
spelling doaj.art-5c2b1b058f1849ca97f2e7a75ce8c1c82024-03-15T11:16:13ZengEco-vectorКлиническая практика2220-30952618-86272024-01-01144182510.17816/clinpract45642978401Instrumental and clinical diagnosis of interdigital Morton neuromaDaria A. Bolshakova0https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3332-9267Andrey A. Kardanov1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2866-2295Musa N. Maysigov2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2096-5876Alexander А. Akhpashev3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2938-5173Dmitriy O. Ilyin4https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2493-4601Andrey V. Korolev5https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8769-9963European Clinic of Sports Traumatology and OrthopaedicsEuropean Clinic of Sports Traumatology and OrthopaedicsEuropean Clinic of Sports Traumatology and OrthopaedicsFederal Scientific and Clinical Center for Specialized Medical Assistance and Medical Technologies of the Federal Medical Biological AgencyEuropean Clinic of Sports Traumatology and OrthopaedicsEuropean Clinic of Sports Traumatology and OrthopaedicsBackground: Interdigital neuroma is one of the most common diseases in foot surgery. It is a common cause of metatarsalgia leading to debilitating pain. At the same time, the diagnosis of neuroma can be a difficult task for an orthopedic surgeon due to the complex anatomy of the forefoot and a large number of soft-tissue and bone structures. Besides, the existing manual testing methods are not pathognomonic specifically for neuroma. The clinical symptoms and history, as well as a physical exam and instrumental evidence are important in assessing and grading the disease. However, there are no recommendations in the modern Russian literature regarding the need for routine visualization of neuroma. The reproducibility of the study, the absence of ionizing radiation and the possibility of obtaining a second opinion, as well as high sensitivity makes magnetic resonance imaging an important diagnostic tool in the diagnosis of neuroma. Aim: To evaluate the importance of the anamnesis and complaints and the sensitivity of clinical tests and magnetic resonance imaging of the foot in the diagnosis of interdigital neuromas. Methods: The study presents a retrospective analysis of the medical histories and outpatient records of 28 patients (8 men and 20 women) treated at the EMC ECSTO in the period from 2017 to 2022. The examination was performed according to a standardized protocol: collection of complaints and anamnesis, palpation, manual testing, including Mulder's click test. As a part of examination, magnetic resonance imaging of the foot was performed for all the patients. The average patient’s age at the time of the surgical treatment was 45 years. The resection of a part of the affected nerve with the subsequent histological examination was considered a gold standard for the treatment and verification of interdigital neuromas. In all the cases, the histopathological study confirmed the diagnosis. Results: The sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of interdigital neuromas was 86%, the sensitivity of the Mulder test was 61%. Pain during the palpation of the affected interdigital space was determined in 100% of cases. Conclusion: The combination of a manual examination and magnetic resonance imaging, along with the analysis of complaints and anamnesis makes it possible to diagnose Morton's neuroma in most cases.https://journals.eco-vector.com/clinpractice/article/viewFile/456429/pdfmorton neuromametatarsalgiamagnetic resonance imagingmri
spellingShingle Daria A. Bolshakova
Andrey A. Kardanov
Musa N. Maysigov
Alexander А. Akhpashev
Dmitriy O. Ilyin
Andrey V. Korolev
Instrumental and clinical diagnosis of interdigital Morton neuroma
Клиническая практика
morton neuroma
metatarsalgia
magnetic resonance imaging
mri
title Instrumental and clinical diagnosis of interdigital Morton neuroma
title_full Instrumental and clinical diagnosis of interdigital Morton neuroma
title_fullStr Instrumental and clinical diagnosis of interdigital Morton neuroma
title_full_unstemmed Instrumental and clinical diagnosis of interdigital Morton neuroma
title_short Instrumental and clinical diagnosis of interdigital Morton neuroma
title_sort instrumental and clinical diagnosis of interdigital morton neuroma
topic morton neuroma
metatarsalgia
magnetic resonance imaging
mri
url https://journals.eco-vector.com/clinpractice/article/viewFile/456429/pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT dariaabolshakova instrumentalandclinicaldiagnosisofinterdigitalmortonneuroma
AT andreyakardanov instrumentalandclinicaldiagnosisofinterdigitalmortonneuroma
AT musanmaysigov instrumentalandclinicaldiagnosisofinterdigitalmortonneuroma
AT alexanderaakhpashev instrumentalandclinicaldiagnosisofinterdigitalmortonneuroma
AT dmitriyoilyin instrumentalandclinicaldiagnosisofinterdigitalmortonneuroma
AT andreyvkorolev instrumentalandclinicaldiagnosisofinterdigitalmortonneuroma