Intersectionality in Adrienne Rich’s Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence and Barbara Smith’s Toward a Black Feminist Criticism
Adrienne Rich in her Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence focuses on the tension between imposed heterosexuality and choice of sexual orientation, whereas Barbara Smith in Toward a Black Feminist Criticism deals with the gap of identity politics between white women and women of color. B...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
ULAB Press
2019-08-01
|
| Series: | Crossings |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.ulab.edu.bd/index.php/crossings/article/view/80 |
| _version_ | 1797659710258675712 |
|---|---|
| author | Leema Sen Gupta |
| author_facet | Leema Sen Gupta |
| author_sort | Leema Sen Gupta |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Adrienne Rich in her Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence focuses on the tension between imposed heterosexuality and choice of sexual orientation, whereas Barbara Smith in Toward a Black Feminist Criticism deals with the gap of identity politics between white women and women of color. Both writings can be examined through the lens of intersectionality. Both Rich and Smith argue that women, in general, are oppressed and have been subject to domination in the patriarchal society. However, they differ in their argument of how the social and institutional forces contribute to the politics of gender, race, and sexuality and how women’s racial and sexual orientation have been exploited to make them vulnerable. Rich, in her writing, shows lesbian women as marginalized not only for being lesbian but also for being women. In Rich’s writing, gender and sexuality intersect with one another, whereas in Smith’s writing, race, gender, and sexuality intersect because she argues that both Black women and Black lesbian women are marginalized simultaneously. This paper will examine how intersectionality has been used by Rich and Smith to understand the differences in their arguments when they are both advocates for the voice of marginalized people in society.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-03-11T18:19:03Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-5c4772d9061d488d9213cc5d214034fa |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2071-1107 2958-3179 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-11T18:19:03Z |
| publishDate | 2019-08-01 |
| publisher | ULAB Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Crossings |
| spelling | doaj.art-5c4772d9061d488d9213cc5d214034fa2023-10-16T04:21:21ZengULAB PressCrossings2071-11072958-31792019-08-011010.59817/cjes.v10i.80Intersectionality in Adrienne Rich’s Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence and Barbara Smith’s Toward a Black Feminist CriticismLeema Sen Gupta0Graduate Student, Department of English, University of North Dakota, United States Adrienne Rich in her Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence focuses on the tension between imposed heterosexuality and choice of sexual orientation, whereas Barbara Smith in Toward a Black Feminist Criticism deals with the gap of identity politics between white women and women of color. Both writings can be examined through the lens of intersectionality. Both Rich and Smith argue that women, in general, are oppressed and have been subject to domination in the patriarchal society. However, they differ in their argument of how the social and institutional forces contribute to the politics of gender, race, and sexuality and how women’s racial and sexual orientation have been exploited to make them vulnerable. Rich, in her writing, shows lesbian women as marginalized not only for being lesbian but also for being women. In Rich’s writing, gender and sexuality intersect with one another, whereas in Smith’s writing, race, gender, and sexuality intersect because she argues that both Black women and Black lesbian women are marginalized simultaneously. This paper will examine how intersectionality has been used by Rich and Smith to understand the differences in their arguments when they are both advocates for the voice of marginalized people in society. https://journals.ulab.edu.bd/index.php/crossings/article/view/80IntersectionalityFeminismRaceGenderHeterosexualityLesbianism |
| spellingShingle | Leema Sen Gupta Intersectionality in Adrienne Rich’s Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence and Barbara Smith’s Toward a Black Feminist Criticism Crossings Intersectionality Feminism Race Gender Heterosexuality Lesbianism |
| title | Intersectionality in Adrienne Rich’s Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence and Barbara Smith’s Toward a Black Feminist Criticism |
| title_full | Intersectionality in Adrienne Rich’s Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence and Barbara Smith’s Toward a Black Feminist Criticism |
| title_fullStr | Intersectionality in Adrienne Rich’s Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence and Barbara Smith’s Toward a Black Feminist Criticism |
| title_full_unstemmed | Intersectionality in Adrienne Rich’s Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence and Barbara Smith’s Toward a Black Feminist Criticism |
| title_short | Intersectionality in Adrienne Rich’s Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence and Barbara Smith’s Toward a Black Feminist Criticism |
| title_sort | intersectionality in adrienne rich s compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence and barbara smith s toward a black feminist criticism |
| topic | Intersectionality Feminism Race Gender Heterosexuality Lesbianism |
| url | https://journals.ulab.edu.bd/index.php/crossings/article/view/80 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT leemasengupta intersectionalityinadriennerichscompulsoryheterosexualityandlesbianexistenceandbarbarasmithstowardablackfeministcriticism |