The value of elbow arthroscopy in diagnosing and treatment of radial head fractures

Abstract Background Surgical treatment of radial head fractures is increasingly performed arthroscopically. These fractures often feature concomitant injuries to the elbow joint, which may be under-diagnosed in the radiological examinations. Little is known about the diagnostic value of arthroscopy,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Florian Haasters, Tobias Helfen, Wolfgang Böcker, Hermann O. Mayr, Wolf Christian Prall, Andreas Lenich
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-07-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-019-2726-6
_version_ 1818851274860265472
author Florian Haasters
Tobias Helfen
Wolfgang Böcker
Hermann O. Mayr
Wolf Christian Prall
Andreas Lenich
author_facet Florian Haasters
Tobias Helfen
Wolfgang Böcker
Hermann O. Mayr
Wolf Christian Prall
Andreas Lenich
author_sort Florian Haasters
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Surgical treatment of radial head fractures is increasingly performed arthroscopically. These fractures often feature concomitant injuries to the elbow joint, which may be under-diagnosed in the radiological examinations. Little is known about the diagnostic value of arthroscopy, the treatment options that arise from arthroscopically assisted fracture fixation and clinical results. We hypothesized that arthroscopy can detect additional concomitant injuries and simultaneously expands the therapeutic options. Therefore aim of this study was to compare arthroscopic and radiologic findings, to assess the distinct arthroscopic procedures and to follow up on the clinical outcomes. Methods Twenty patients with radial head fractures were retrospectively included in two study centers. All patients underwent elbow arthroscopy due to at least one of the following suspected concomitant injuries: osteochondral lesions of the humeral capitellum, injuries of the collateral ligaments or loose joint bodies. Preoperative radiological findings were compared to arthroscopic findings. Afterwards, arthroscopic treatment options and clinical outcomes were assessed. Results Arthroscopic findings led to revision of the classified fracture type in 70% (p = 0.001) when compared to preoperative conventional radiographs (CR) and in 9% (p = 0.598) when compared to computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Diagnosis of loose bodies was missed in 60% (p < 0.001) of the CR and in 18% (p = 0.269) of the CT/MRI scans. Osteochondral lesions were not identified in 94% (p < 0.001) of the CR and in 27% (p = 0.17) of the CT/MRI scans. Percutaneous screw fixation was performed in 65% and partial radial head resection in 10%. Arthroscopy revealed elbow instability in 35%, leading to lateral collateral ligament reconstruction. After a mean follow up of 41.4 ± 3.4 months functional outcome was excellent in all cases (DASH-Score 0.6 ± 0.8; MEPI-Score 98.5 ± 2.4; OES-Score 47.3 ± 1.1). Conclusions Elbow arthroscopy has a significant diagnostic value in radial head fractures when compared to standard radiological imaging. Although statistically not significant, arthroscopy also revealed concomitant injuries in patients that presented with an uneventful MRI/CT. Furthermore, all intraarticular findings could be treated arthroscopically allowing for excellent functional outcomes. Trial registration Institutional Review Board University of Munich (LMU), Trial Number 507–14.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T07:02:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5c50d6e1eb29453a8a370e21d3dfdd54
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2474
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T07:02:26Z
publishDate 2019-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
spelling doaj.art-5c50d6e1eb29453a8a370e21d3dfdd542022-12-21T20:31:22ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742019-07-0120111010.1186/s12891-019-2726-6The value of elbow arthroscopy in diagnosing and treatment of radial head fracturesFlorian Haasters0Tobias Helfen1Wolfgang Böcker2Hermann O. Mayr3Wolf Christian Prall4Andreas Lenich5Hospital of General, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Munich (LMU)Hospital of General, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Munich (LMU)Hospital of General, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Munich (LMU)Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Freiburg University Hospital, Albert-Ludwigs-University of FreiburgHospital of General, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Munich (LMU)Department of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Technical University MunichAbstract Background Surgical treatment of radial head fractures is increasingly performed arthroscopically. These fractures often feature concomitant injuries to the elbow joint, which may be under-diagnosed in the radiological examinations. Little is known about the diagnostic value of arthroscopy, the treatment options that arise from arthroscopically assisted fracture fixation and clinical results. We hypothesized that arthroscopy can detect additional concomitant injuries and simultaneously expands the therapeutic options. Therefore aim of this study was to compare arthroscopic and radiologic findings, to assess the distinct arthroscopic procedures and to follow up on the clinical outcomes. Methods Twenty patients with radial head fractures were retrospectively included in two study centers. All patients underwent elbow arthroscopy due to at least one of the following suspected concomitant injuries: osteochondral lesions of the humeral capitellum, injuries of the collateral ligaments or loose joint bodies. Preoperative radiological findings were compared to arthroscopic findings. Afterwards, arthroscopic treatment options and clinical outcomes were assessed. Results Arthroscopic findings led to revision of the classified fracture type in 70% (p = 0.001) when compared to preoperative conventional radiographs (CR) and in 9% (p = 0.598) when compared to computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Diagnosis of loose bodies was missed in 60% (p < 0.001) of the CR and in 18% (p = 0.269) of the CT/MRI scans. Osteochondral lesions were not identified in 94% (p < 0.001) of the CR and in 27% (p = 0.17) of the CT/MRI scans. Percutaneous screw fixation was performed in 65% and partial radial head resection in 10%. Arthroscopy revealed elbow instability in 35%, leading to lateral collateral ligament reconstruction. After a mean follow up of 41.4 ± 3.4 months functional outcome was excellent in all cases (DASH-Score 0.6 ± 0.8; MEPI-Score 98.5 ± 2.4; OES-Score 47.3 ± 1.1). Conclusions Elbow arthroscopy has a significant diagnostic value in radial head fractures when compared to standard radiological imaging. Although statistically not significant, arthroscopy also revealed concomitant injuries in patients that presented with an uneventful MRI/CT. Furthermore, all intraarticular findings could be treated arthroscopically allowing for excellent functional outcomes. Trial registration Institutional Review Board University of Munich (LMU), Trial Number 507–14.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-019-2726-6Radial head fractureArthroscopyAssociated injuryElbow dislocationArthroscopic assisted fracture treatment
spellingShingle Florian Haasters
Tobias Helfen
Wolfgang Böcker
Hermann O. Mayr
Wolf Christian Prall
Andreas Lenich
The value of elbow arthroscopy in diagnosing and treatment of radial head fractures
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Radial head fracture
Arthroscopy
Associated injury
Elbow dislocation
Arthroscopic assisted fracture treatment
title The value of elbow arthroscopy in diagnosing and treatment of radial head fractures
title_full The value of elbow arthroscopy in diagnosing and treatment of radial head fractures
title_fullStr The value of elbow arthroscopy in diagnosing and treatment of radial head fractures
title_full_unstemmed The value of elbow arthroscopy in diagnosing and treatment of radial head fractures
title_short The value of elbow arthroscopy in diagnosing and treatment of radial head fractures
title_sort value of elbow arthroscopy in diagnosing and treatment of radial head fractures
topic Radial head fracture
Arthroscopy
Associated injury
Elbow dislocation
Arthroscopic assisted fracture treatment
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-019-2726-6
work_keys_str_mv AT florianhaasters thevalueofelbowarthroscopyindiagnosingandtreatmentofradialheadfractures
AT tobiashelfen thevalueofelbowarthroscopyindiagnosingandtreatmentofradialheadfractures
AT wolfgangbocker thevalueofelbowarthroscopyindiagnosingandtreatmentofradialheadfractures
AT hermannomayr thevalueofelbowarthroscopyindiagnosingandtreatmentofradialheadfractures
AT wolfchristianprall thevalueofelbowarthroscopyindiagnosingandtreatmentofradialheadfractures
AT andreaslenich thevalueofelbowarthroscopyindiagnosingandtreatmentofradialheadfractures
AT florianhaasters valueofelbowarthroscopyindiagnosingandtreatmentofradialheadfractures
AT tobiashelfen valueofelbowarthroscopyindiagnosingandtreatmentofradialheadfractures
AT wolfgangbocker valueofelbowarthroscopyindiagnosingandtreatmentofradialheadfractures
AT hermannomayr valueofelbowarthroscopyindiagnosingandtreatmentofradialheadfractures
AT wolfchristianprall valueofelbowarthroscopyindiagnosingandtreatmentofradialheadfractures
AT andreaslenich valueofelbowarthroscopyindiagnosingandtreatmentofradialheadfractures