Interactions between spider silk and cells--NIH/3T3 fibroblasts seeded on miniature weaving frames.

BACKGROUND: Several materials have been used for tissue engineering purposes, since the ideal matrix depends on the desired tissue. Silk biomaterials have come to focus due to their great mechanical properties. As untreated silkworm silk has been found to be quite immunogenic, an alternative could b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joern W Kuhbier, Christina Allmeling, Kerstin Reimers, Anja Hillmer, Cornelia Kasper, Bjoern Menger, Gudrun Brandes, Merlin Guggenheim, Peter M Vogt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2010-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2918503?pdf=render
_version_ 1818134015424593920
author Joern W Kuhbier
Christina Allmeling
Kerstin Reimers
Anja Hillmer
Cornelia Kasper
Bjoern Menger
Gudrun Brandes
Merlin Guggenheim
Peter M Vogt
author_facet Joern W Kuhbier
Christina Allmeling
Kerstin Reimers
Anja Hillmer
Cornelia Kasper
Bjoern Menger
Gudrun Brandes
Merlin Guggenheim
Peter M Vogt
author_sort Joern W Kuhbier
collection DOAJ
description BACKGROUND: Several materials have been used for tissue engineering purposes, since the ideal matrix depends on the desired tissue. Silk biomaterials have come to focus due to their great mechanical properties. As untreated silkworm silk has been found to be quite immunogenic, an alternative could be spider silk. Not only does it own unique mechanical properties, its biocompatibility has been shown already in vivo. In our study, we used native spider dragline silk which is known as the strongest fibre in nature. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Steel frames were originally designed and manufactured and woven with spider silk, harvesting dragline silk directly out of the animal. After sterilization, scaffolds were seeded with fibroblasts to analyse cell proliferation and adhesion. Analysis of cell morphology and actin filament alignment clearly revealed adherence. Proliferation was measured by cell count as well as determination of relative fluorescence each after 1, 2, 3, and 5 days. Cell counts for native spider silk were also compared with those for trypsin-digested spider silk. Spider silk specimens displayed less proliferation than collagen- and fibronectin-coated cover slips, enzymatic treatment reduced adhesion and proliferation rates tendentially though not significantly. Nevertheless, proliferation could be proven with high significance (p<0.01). CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Native spider silk does not require any modification to its application as a biomaterial that can rival any artificial material in terms of cell growth promoting properties. We could show adhesion mechanics on intracellular level. Additionally, proliferation kinetics were higher than in enzymatically digested controls, indicating that spider silk does not require modification. Recent findings concerning reduction of cell proliferation after exposure could not be met. As biotechnological production of the hierarchical composition of native spider silk fibres is still a challenge, our study has a pioneer role in researching cellular mechanics on native spider silk fibres.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T09:01:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5c6bf50092124a39a7839239685d252e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T09:01:54Z
publishDate 2010-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-5c6bf50092124a39a7839239685d252e2022-12-22T01:13:44ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032010-01-0158e1203210.1371/journal.pone.0012032Interactions between spider silk and cells--NIH/3T3 fibroblasts seeded on miniature weaving frames.Joern W KuhbierChristina AllmelingKerstin ReimersAnja HillmerCornelia KasperBjoern MengerGudrun BrandesMerlin GuggenheimPeter M VogtBACKGROUND: Several materials have been used for tissue engineering purposes, since the ideal matrix depends on the desired tissue. Silk biomaterials have come to focus due to their great mechanical properties. As untreated silkworm silk has been found to be quite immunogenic, an alternative could be spider silk. Not only does it own unique mechanical properties, its biocompatibility has been shown already in vivo. In our study, we used native spider dragline silk which is known as the strongest fibre in nature. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Steel frames were originally designed and manufactured and woven with spider silk, harvesting dragline silk directly out of the animal. After sterilization, scaffolds were seeded with fibroblasts to analyse cell proliferation and adhesion. Analysis of cell morphology and actin filament alignment clearly revealed adherence. Proliferation was measured by cell count as well as determination of relative fluorescence each after 1, 2, 3, and 5 days. Cell counts for native spider silk were also compared with those for trypsin-digested spider silk. Spider silk specimens displayed less proliferation than collagen- and fibronectin-coated cover slips, enzymatic treatment reduced adhesion and proliferation rates tendentially though not significantly. Nevertheless, proliferation could be proven with high significance (p<0.01). CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Native spider silk does not require any modification to its application as a biomaterial that can rival any artificial material in terms of cell growth promoting properties. We could show adhesion mechanics on intracellular level. Additionally, proliferation kinetics were higher than in enzymatically digested controls, indicating that spider silk does not require modification. Recent findings concerning reduction of cell proliferation after exposure could not be met. As biotechnological production of the hierarchical composition of native spider silk fibres is still a challenge, our study has a pioneer role in researching cellular mechanics on native spider silk fibres.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2918503?pdf=render
spellingShingle Joern W Kuhbier
Christina Allmeling
Kerstin Reimers
Anja Hillmer
Cornelia Kasper
Bjoern Menger
Gudrun Brandes
Merlin Guggenheim
Peter M Vogt
Interactions between spider silk and cells--NIH/3T3 fibroblasts seeded on miniature weaving frames.
PLoS ONE
title Interactions between spider silk and cells--NIH/3T3 fibroblasts seeded on miniature weaving frames.
title_full Interactions between spider silk and cells--NIH/3T3 fibroblasts seeded on miniature weaving frames.
title_fullStr Interactions between spider silk and cells--NIH/3T3 fibroblasts seeded on miniature weaving frames.
title_full_unstemmed Interactions between spider silk and cells--NIH/3T3 fibroblasts seeded on miniature weaving frames.
title_short Interactions between spider silk and cells--NIH/3T3 fibroblasts seeded on miniature weaving frames.
title_sort interactions between spider silk and cells nih 3t3 fibroblasts seeded on miniature weaving frames
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2918503?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT joernwkuhbier interactionsbetweenspidersilkandcellsnih3t3fibroblastsseededonminiatureweavingframes
AT christinaallmeling interactionsbetweenspidersilkandcellsnih3t3fibroblastsseededonminiatureweavingframes
AT kerstinreimers interactionsbetweenspidersilkandcellsnih3t3fibroblastsseededonminiatureweavingframes
AT anjahillmer interactionsbetweenspidersilkandcellsnih3t3fibroblastsseededonminiatureweavingframes
AT corneliakasper interactionsbetweenspidersilkandcellsnih3t3fibroblastsseededonminiatureweavingframes
AT bjoernmenger interactionsbetweenspidersilkandcellsnih3t3fibroblastsseededonminiatureweavingframes
AT gudrunbrandes interactionsbetweenspidersilkandcellsnih3t3fibroblastsseededonminiatureweavingframes
AT merlinguggenheim interactionsbetweenspidersilkandcellsnih3t3fibroblastsseededonminiatureweavingframes
AT petermvogt interactionsbetweenspidersilkandcellsnih3t3fibroblastsseededonminiatureweavingframes