Evaluation of temporal compositing algorithms for annual land cover classification using Landsat time series data

In this paper, four widely used temporal compositing algorithms, i.e. median, maximum NDVI, medoid, and weighted scoring-based algorithms, were evaluated for annual land cover classification using monthly Landsat time series data. Four study areas located in California, Texas, Kansas, and Minnesota,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xichen Meng, Shuai Xie, Lin Sun, Liangyun Liu, Yilong Han
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2023-12-01
Series:International Journal of Digital Earth
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2023.2230958
_version_ 1797678424348688384
author Xichen Meng
Shuai Xie
Lin Sun
Liangyun Liu
Yilong Han
author_facet Xichen Meng
Shuai Xie
Lin Sun
Liangyun Liu
Yilong Han
author_sort Xichen Meng
collection DOAJ
description In this paper, four widely used temporal compositing algorithms, i.e. median, maximum NDVI, medoid, and weighted scoring-based algorithms, were evaluated for annual land cover classification using monthly Landsat time series data. Four study areas located in California, Texas, Kansas, and Minnesota, USA were selected for image compositing and land cover classification. Results indicated that images composited using weighted scoring-based algorithms have the best spatial fidelity compared to other three algorithms. In addition, the weighted scoring-based algorithms have superior classification accuracy, followed by median, maximum NDVI, and medoid in descending order. However, the median algorithm has a significant advantage in computational efficiency which was ∼70 times that of weighted scoring-based algorithms, and with overall classification accuracy just slightly lower (∼0.13% on average) than weighted scoring-based algorithms. Therefore, we recommended the weighted scoring-based compositing algorithms for small area land cover mapping, and median compositing algorithm for the land cover mapping of large area considering the balance between computational complexity and classification accuracy. The findings of this study provide insights into the performance difference between various compositing algorithms, and have potential uses for the selection of pixel-based image compositing technique adopted for land cover mapping based on Landsat time series data.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T22:59:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5c7f93e8fc664498a3abc715513567aa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1753-8947
1753-8955
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T22:59:35Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series International Journal of Digital Earth
spelling doaj.art-5c7f93e8fc664498a3abc715513567aa2023-09-21T15:09:03ZengTaylor & Francis GroupInternational Journal of Digital Earth1753-89471753-89552023-12-011612574259810.1080/17538947.2023.22309582230958Evaluation of temporal compositing algorithms for annual land cover classification using Landsat time series dataXichen Meng0Shuai Xie1Lin Sun2Liangyun Liu3Yilong Han4Shandong University of Science and TechnologyShandong University of Science and TechnologyShandong University of Science and TechnologyAerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of SciencesShandong University of Science and TechnologyIn this paper, four widely used temporal compositing algorithms, i.e. median, maximum NDVI, medoid, and weighted scoring-based algorithms, were evaluated for annual land cover classification using monthly Landsat time series data. Four study areas located in California, Texas, Kansas, and Minnesota, USA were selected for image compositing and land cover classification. Results indicated that images composited using weighted scoring-based algorithms have the best spatial fidelity compared to other three algorithms. In addition, the weighted scoring-based algorithms have superior classification accuracy, followed by median, maximum NDVI, and medoid in descending order. However, the median algorithm has a significant advantage in computational efficiency which was ∼70 times that of weighted scoring-based algorithms, and with overall classification accuracy just slightly lower (∼0.13% on average) than weighted scoring-based algorithms. Therefore, we recommended the weighted scoring-based compositing algorithms for small area land cover mapping, and median compositing algorithm for the land cover mapping of large area considering the balance between computational complexity and classification accuracy. The findings of this study provide insights into the performance difference between various compositing algorithms, and have potential uses for the selection of pixel-based image compositing technique adopted for land cover mapping based on Landsat time series data.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2023.2230958temporal compositingspatial fidelitytime seriesland cover classificationlandsat
spellingShingle Xichen Meng
Shuai Xie
Lin Sun
Liangyun Liu
Yilong Han
Evaluation of temporal compositing algorithms for annual land cover classification using Landsat time series data
International Journal of Digital Earth
temporal compositing
spatial fidelity
time series
land cover classification
landsat
title Evaluation of temporal compositing algorithms for annual land cover classification using Landsat time series data
title_full Evaluation of temporal compositing algorithms for annual land cover classification using Landsat time series data
title_fullStr Evaluation of temporal compositing algorithms for annual land cover classification using Landsat time series data
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of temporal compositing algorithms for annual land cover classification using Landsat time series data
title_short Evaluation of temporal compositing algorithms for annual land cover classification using Landsat time series data
title_sort evaluation of temporal compositing algorithms for annual land cover classification using landsat time series data
topic temporal compositing
spatial fidelity
time series
land cover classification
landsat
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2023.2230958
work_keys_str_mv AT xichenmeng evaluationoftemporalcompositingalgorithmsforannuallandcoverclassificationusinglandsattimeseriesdata
AT shuaixie evaluationoftemporalcompositingalgorithmsforannuallandcoverclassificationusinglandsattimeseriesdata
AT linsun evaluationoftemporalcompositingalgorithmsforannuallandcoverclassificationusinglandsattimeseriesdata
AT liangyunliu evaluationoftemporalcompositingalgorithmsforannuallandcoverclassificationusinglandsattimeseriesdata
AT yilonghan evaluationoftemporalcompositingalgorithmsforannuallandcoverclassificationusinglandsattimeseriesdata