Development and validation of a nomogram model for the prediction of 4L lymph node metastasis in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

ObjectivesThe left tracheobronchial (4L) lymph nodes (LNs) are considered as regional LNs for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but there is a controversy about routine prophylactic 4L LN dissection for all resectable ESCCs. This study aimed to develop a nomogram for preoperative prediction...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lei Xu, Jia Guo, Shu Qi, Hou-nai Xie, Xiu-feng Wei, Yong-kui Yu, Ping Cao, Rui-xiang Zhang, Xian-kai Chen, Yin Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.887047/full
_version_ 1818024354469904384
author Lei Xu
Jia Guo
Shu Qi
Hou-nai Xie
Xiu-feng Wei
Yong-kui Yu
Ping Cao
Rui-xiang Zhang
Xian-kai Chen
Yin Li
author_facet Lei Xu
Jia Guo
Shu Qi
Hou-nai Xie
Xiu-feng Wei
Yong-kui Yu
Ping Cao
Rui-xiang Zhang
Xian-kai Chen
Yin Li
author_sort Lei Xu
collection DOAJ
description ObjectivesThe left tracheobronchial (4L) lymph nodes (LNs) are considered as regional LNs for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but there is a controversy about routine prophylactic 4L LN dissection for all resectable ESCCs. This study aimed to develop a nomogram for preoperative prediction of station 4L lymph node metastases (LNMs).MethodsA total of 522 EC patients in the training cohort and 370 in the external validation cohort were included. The prognostic impact of station 4L LNM was evaluated, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors of station 4L LNM. A nomogram model was developed based on multivariable logistic regression analysis. Model performance was evaluated in both cohorts in terms of calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness.ResultsThe incidence of station 4L LNM was 7.9% (41/522) in the training cohort. Patients with station 4L LNM exhibited a poorer 5-year overall survival rate than those without (43.2% vs. 71.6%, p < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression analyses, six variables were confirmed as independent 4L LNM risk factors: sex (p = 0.039), depth of invasion (p = 0.002), tumor differentiation (p = 0.016), short axis of the largest 4L LNs (p = 0.001), 4L conglomeration (p = 0.006), and 4L necrosis (p = 0.002). A nomogram model, containing six independent risk factors, demonstrated a good performance, with the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.921 (95% CI: 0.878–0.964) in the training cohort and 0.892 (95% CI: 0.830–0.954) in the validation cohort. The calibration curve showed a good agreement on the presence of station 4L LNM between the risk estimation according to the model and histopathologic results on surgical specimens. The Hosmer–Lemeshow test demonstrated a non-significant statistic (p = 0.691 and 0.897) in the training and validation cohorts, which indicated no departure from the perfect fit. Decision curve analysis indicated that the model had better diagnostic power for 4L LNM than the traditional LN size criteria.ConclusionsThis model integrated the available clinical and radiological risk factors, facilitating in the precise prediction of 4L LNM in patients with ESCC and aiding in personalized therapeutic decision-making regarding the need for routine prophylactic 4L lymphadenectomy.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T03:58:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5c9afa0affbc4fb2a19061e5fa5b0af4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2234-943X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T03:58:53Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Oncology
spelling doaj.art-5c9afa0affbc4fb2a19061e5fa5b0af42022-12-22T02:03:02ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2022-10-011210.3389/fonc.2022.887047887047Development and validation of a nomogram model for the prediction of 4L lymph node metastasis in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinomaLei Xu0Jia Guo1Shu Qi2Hou-nai Xie3Xiu-feng Wei4Yong-kui Yu5Ping Cao6Rui-xiang Zhang7Xian-kai Chen8Yin Li9Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, ChinaObjectivesThe left tracheobronchial (4L) lymph nodes (LNs) are considered as regional LNs for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but there is a controversy about routine prophylactic 4L LN dissection for all resectable ESCCs. This study aimed to develop a nomogram for preoperative prediction of station 4L lymph node metastases (LNMs).MethodsA total of 522 EC patients in the training cohort and 370 in the external validation cohort were included. The prognostic impact of station 4L LNM was evaluated, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors of station 4L LNM. A nomogram model was developed based on multivariable logistic regression analysis. Model performance was evaluated in both cohorts in terms of calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness.ResultsThe incidence of station 4L LNM was 7.9% (41/522) in the training cohort. Patients with station 4L LNM exhibited a poorer 5-year overall survival rate than those without (43.2% vs. 71.6%, p < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression analyses, six variables were confirmed as independent 4L LNM risk factors: sex (p = 0.039), depth of invasion (p = 0.002), tumor differentiation (p = 0.016), short axis of the largest 4L LNs (p = 0.001), 4L conglomeration (p = 0.006), and 4L necrosis (p = 0.002). A nomogram model, containing six independent risk factors, demonstrated a good performance, with the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.921 (95% CI: 0.878–0.964) in the training cohort and 0.892 (95% CI: 0.830–0.954) in the validation cohort. The calibration curve showed a good agreement on the presence of station 4L LNM between the risk estimation according to the model and histopathologic results on surgical specimens. The Hosmer–Lemeshow test demonstrated a non-significant statistic (p = 0.691 and 0.897) in the training and validation cohorts, which indicated no departure from the perfect fit. Decision curve analysis indicated that the model had better diagnostic power for 4L LNM than the traditional LN size criteria.ConclusionsThis model integrated the available clinical and radiological risk factors, facilitating in the precise prediction of 4L LNM in patients with ESCC and aiding in personalized therapeutic decision-making regarding the need for routine prophylactic 4L lymphadenectomy.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.887047/fullleft tracheobronchial (4L) lymph nodeslymphadenectomynomogramlymph node metastasesesophageal squamous cell carcinoma
spellingShingle Lei Xu
Jia Guo
Shu Qi
Hou-nai Xie
Xiu-feng Wei
Yong-kui Yu
Ping Cao
Rui-xiang Zhang
Xian-kai Chen
Yin Li
Development and validation of a nomogram model for the prediction of 4L lymph node metastasis in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Frontiers in Oncology
left tracheobronchial (4L) lymph nodes
lymphadenectomy
nomogram
lymph node metastases
esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
title Development and validation of a nomogram model for the prediction of 4L lymph node metastasis in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
title_full Development and validation of a nomogram model for the prediction of 4L lymph node metastasis in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
title_fullStr Development and validation of a nomogram model for the prediction of 4L lymph node metastasis in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of a nomogram model for the prediction of 4L lymph node metastasis in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
title_short Development and validation of a nomogram model for the prediction of 4L lymph node metastasis in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
title_sort development and validation of a nomogram model for the prediction of 4l lymph node metastasis in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
topic left tracheobronchial (4L) lymph nodes
lymphadenectomy
nomogram
lymph node metastases
esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.887047/full
work_keys_str_mv AT leixu developmentandvalidationofanomogrammodelforthepredictionof4llymphnodemetastasisinthoracicesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT jiaguo developmentandvalidationofanomogrammodelforthepredictionof4llymphnodemetastasisinthoracicesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT shuqi developmentandvalidationofanomogrammodelforthepredictionof4llymphnodemetastasisinthoracicesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT hounaixie developmentandvalidationofanomogrammodelforthepredictionof4llymphnodemetastasisinthoracicesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT xiufengwei developmentandvalidationofanomogrammodelforthepredictionof4llymphnodemetastasisinthoracicesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT yongkuiyu developmentandvalidationofanomogrammodelforthepredictionof4llymphnodemetastasisinthoracicesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT pingcao developmentandvalidationofanomogrammodelforthepredictionof4llymphnodemetastasisinthoracicesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT ruixiangzhang developmentandvalidationofanomogrammodelforthepredictionof4llymphnodemetastasisinthoracicesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT xiankaichen developmentandvalidationofanomogrammodelforthepredictionof4llymphnodemetastasisinthoracicesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT yinli developmentandvalidationofanomogrammodelforthepredictionof4llymphnodemetastasisinthoracicesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma