Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Lorlatinib in Patients Previously Treated with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibitors for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Greece

**Background:** Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which accounts for about 80%-85% of lungcancer cases, is a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Lorlatinib is a potent third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients with advanced, ALK...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: George Gourzoulidis, Oresteia Zisimopoulou, Nadia Boubouchairopoulou, Christina Michailidi, Chrissy Lowry, Charalampos Tzanetakos, Georgia Kourlaba
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Columbia Data Analytics, LLC 2022-02-01
Series:Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
Online Access:https://jheor.scholasticahq.com/article/31983-cost-effectiveness-analysis-of-lorlatinib-in-patients-previously-treated-with-anaplastic-lymphoma-kinase-inhibitors-for-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-in.pdf
_version_ 1818974578264768512
author George Gourzoulidis
Oresteia Zisimopoulou
Nadia Boubouchairopoulou
Christina Michailidi
Chrissy Lowry
Charalampos Tzanetakos
Georgia Kourlaba
author_facet George Gourzoulidis
Oresteia Zisimopoulou
Nadia Boubouchairopoulou
Christina Michailidi
Chrissy Lowry
Charalampos Tzanetakos
Georgia Kourlaba
author_sort George Gourzoulidis
collection DOAJ
description **Background:** Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which accounts for about 80%-85% of lungcancer cases, is a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Lorlatinib is a potent third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients with advanced, ALK-positive NSCLC previously treated with at least one second-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor. **Objective:** The present study assessed the cost-effectiveness of lorlatinib vs pemetrexed with platinum combination of carboplatin or cisplatin (P-ChT) in Greece. **Methods:** A partitioned survival model with three health states, referring to pre-progression, progressed disease, and death, was locally adapted from a Greek payer perspective over a lifetime horizon. Clinical and safety data and utility values applied in the model were extracted from the literature. A matching-adjusted indirect comparison of lorlatinib and P-ChT was performed. Only direct medical costs (€) from 2020 were included in the analysis. Primary outcomes were patient life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), total costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios per QALY and LY gained. All future outcomes were discounted at 3.5% per annum. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted to account for model uncertainty. **Results:** The analysis showed that, over a lifetime horizon, the estimated total costs of lorlatinib and P-ChT were €81 754 and €12 343, respectively. Lorlatinib was more effective than P-ChT with 2.4 and 1.5 more LYs and QALYs gained, respectively. The generated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of lorlatinib compared with P-ChT were €28 613 per LY gained and €46 102 per QALY gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the deterministic results. **Conclusion:** The present analysis suggests that lorlatinib may be considered as a cost-effective option compared with P-ChT in Greece for the treatment of patients with advanced, ALK-positive NSCLC whose disease has progressed after at least one second-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor. In addition, this option addresses a significant unmet medical need.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T15:42:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5ca95998ef6248ad99dbde981987cbc3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2327-2236
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T15:42:17Z
publishDate 2022-02-01
publisher Columbia Data Analytics, LLC
record_format Article
series Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
spelling doaj.art-5ca95998ef6248ad99dbde981987cbc32022-12-21T19:35:07ZengColumbia Data Analytics, LLCJournal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research2327-22362022-02-01Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Lorlatinib in Patients Previously Treated with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibitors for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in GreeceGeorge GourzoulidisOresteia ZisimopoulouNadia BoubouchairopoulouChristina MichailidiChrissy LowryCharalampos TzanetakosGeorgia Kourlaba**Background:** Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which accounts for about 80%-85% of lungcancer cases, is a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Lorlatinib is a potent third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients with advanced, ALK-positive NSCLC previously treated with at least one second-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor. **Objective:** The present study assessed the cost-effectiveness of lorlatinib vs pemetrexed with platinum combination of carboplatin or cisplatin (P-ChT) in Greece. **Methods:** A partitioned survival model with three health states, referring to pre-progression, progressed disease, and death, was locally adapted from a Greek payer perspective over a lifetime horizon. Clinical and safety data and utility values applied in the model were extracted from the literature. A matching-adjusted indirect comparison of lorlatinib and P-ChT was performed. Only direct medical costs (€) from 2020 were included in the analysis. Primary outcomes were patient life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), total costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios per QALY and LY gained. All future outcomes were discounted at 3.5% per annum. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted to account for model uncertainty. **Results:** The analysis showed that, over a lifetime horizon, the estimated total costs of lorlatinib and P-ChT were €81 754 and €12 343, respectively. Lorlatinib was more effective than P-ChT with 2.4 and 1.5 more LYs and QALYs gained, respectively. The generated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of lorlatinib compared with P-ChT were €28 613 per LY gained and €46 102 per QALY gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the deterministic results. **Conclusion:** The present analysis suggests that lorlatinib may be considered as a cost-effective option compared with P-ChT in Greece for the treatment of patients with advanced, ALK-positive NSCLC whose disease has progressed after at least one second-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor. In addition, this option addresses a significant unmet medical need.https://jheor.scholasticahq.com/article/31983-cost-effectiveness-analysis-of-lorlatinib-in-patients-previously-treated-with-anaplastic-lymphoma-kinase-inhibitors-for-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-in.pdf
spellingShingle George Gourzoulidis
Oresteia Zisimopoulou
Nadia Boubouchairopoulou
Christina Michailidi
Chrissy Lowry
Charalampos Tzanetakos
Georgia Kourlaba
Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Lorlatinib in Patients Previously Treated with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibitors for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Greece
Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
title Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Lorlatinib in Patients Previously Treated with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibitors for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Greece
title_full Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Lorlatinib in Patients Previously Treated with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibitors for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Greece
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Lorlatinib in Patients Previously Treated with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibitors for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Greece
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Lorlatinib in Patients Previously Treated with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibitors for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Greece
title_short Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Lorlatinib in Patients Previously Treated with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibitors for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Greece
title_sort cost effectiveness analysis of lorlatinib in patients previously treated with anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors for non small cell lung cancer in greece
url https://jheor.scholasticahq.com/article/31983-cost-effectiveness-analysis-of-lorlatinib-in-patients-previously-treated-with-anaplastic-lymphoma-kinase-inhibitors-for-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-in.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT georgegourzoulidis costeffectivenessanalysisoflorlatinibinpatientspreviouslytreatedwithanaplasticlymphomakinaseinhibitorsfornonsmallcelllungcanceringreece
AT oresteiazisimopoulou costeffectivenessanalysisoflorlatinibinpatientspreviouslytreatedwithanaplasticlymphomakinaseinhibitorsfornonsmallcelllungcanceringreece
AT nadiaboubouchairopoulou costeffectivenessanalysisoflorlatinibinpatientspreviouslytreatedwithanaplasticlymphomakinaseinhibitorsfornonsmallcelllungcanceringreece
AT christinamichailidi costeffectivenessanalysisoflorlatinibinpatientspreviouslytreatedwithanaplasticlymphomakinaseinhibitorsfornonsmallcelllungcanceringreece
AT chrissylowry costeffectivenessanalysisoflorlatinibinpatientspreviouslytreatedwithanaplasticlymphomakinaseinhibitorsfornonsmallcelllungcanceringreece
AT charalampostzanetakos costeffectivenessanalysisoflorlatinibinpatientspreviouslytreatedwithanaplasticlymphomakinaseinhibitorsfornonsmallcelllungcanceringreece
AT georgiakourlaba costeffectivenessanalysisoflorlatinibinpatientspreviouslytreatedwithanaplasticlymphomakinaseinhibitorsfornonsmallcelllungcanceringreece