Amulets Depicting the Eye of Horus from Burial Mounds of Early Nomads in the Southern Urals
Three faience amulets depicting the Eye of Horus (Wedjat) were discovered in the Southern Urals. They all come from burial mounds of early nomads and are dated by local chronologies to the 5th – 4th centuries BC. One pendant comes from a pristine (not looted) burial of the burial mound Filippovka I;...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
Volgograd State University
2018-06-01
|
| Series: | Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 4. История, регионоведение, международные отношения |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hfrir.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/1701 |
| _version_ | 1797694588963520512 |
|---|---|
| author | Olga V. Anikeeva [Leonid T. Yablonsky] |
| author_facet | Olga V. Anikeeva [Leonid T. Yablonsky] |
| author_sort | Olga V. Anikeeva |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Three faience amulets depicting the Eye of Horus (Wedjat) were discovered in the Southern Urals. They all come from burial mounds of early nomads and are dated by local chronologies to the 5th – 4th centuries BC. One pendant comes from a pristine (not looted) burial of the burial mound Filippovka I; it was found in a complex of objects covered with a mirror. The two other pendants, similar to one another, were found in looted burials of the burial mound Novy Kumak. The material and iconography of the Filippovka amulet place it close to the types 138 v, w, and z in the classification of F. Petrie, who believed that this type of depiction of the Eye of Horus had originated from the time of the 6th Dynasty (end of the Old Kingdom) and persisted through the end of the Ptolemaic Egypt. The pendants from Novy Kumak are comparable to Petrie’s types 138 r, s, and t, which appear during the 23rd Dynasty (3rd Intermediate Period) and vanish early during the Ptolemaic dynasty. An extensive import of goods from Egypt to Mediterranean countries during the 1st millennium BC resulted in the local craft centers in Syria, Judea, Anatolia, Greece, Italy and island states copying the Egyptian technologies of manufacturing glass and faience and starting manufacture of their own goods with the imported technologies. Trace analysis and analysis of faience composition showed that the pendants from Filippovka and Novy Kumak had been manufactured following different Egyptian faience recipes. SEM and SEM/EDX analyses of the Filippovka pendant suggest a possibility that it was made in handicraft centers of the Eastern Mediterranean with a borrowed technology.
L. T. Yablonsky has developed the original idea of the research, aimed at not only revealing the origin of imported items, but also identifying the purpose of these amulets in rituals of early nomads. The author has analyzed the semantics of the amulets’ image adopted in ancient Egypt, and the likely use of these amulets by nomads, made conclusions. O. V. Anikeeva has studied the iconography of amulets, their distribution among nomads, investigated the materials using natural-science methods. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T03:00:06Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-5cad870895684768b6d80cd073bb27ff |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1998-9938 2312-8704 |
| language | Russian |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T03:00:06Z |
| publishDate | 2018-06-01 |
| publisher | Volgograd State University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 4. История, регионоведение, международные отношения |
| spelling | doaj.art-5cad870895684768b6d80cd073bb27ff2023-09-03T14:53:50ZrusVolgograd State UniversityВестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 4. История, регионоведение, международные отношения1998-99382312-87042018-06-01233638110.15688/jvolsu4.2018.3.6Amulets Depicting the Eye of Horus from Burial Mounds of Early Nomads in the Southern UralsOlga V. Anikeeva0[Leonid T. Yablonsky]1State Research Institute for RestorationInstitute of Archaeology, Russian Academy of SciencesThree faience amulets depicting the Eye of Horus (Wedjat) were discovered in the Southern Urals. They all come from burial mounds of early nomads and are dated by local chronologies to the 5th – 4th centuries BC. One pendant comes from a pristine (not looted) burial of the burial mound Filippovka I; it was found in a complex of objects covered with a mirror. The two other pendants, similar to one another, were found in looted burials of the burial mound Novy Kumak. The material and iconography of the Filippovka amulet place it close to the types 138 v, w, and z in the classification of F. Petrie, who believed that this type of depiction of the Eye of Horus had originated from the time of the 6th Dynasty (end of the Old Kingdom) and persisted through the end of the Ptolemaic Egypt. The pendants from Novy Kumak are comparable to Petrie’s types 138 r, s, and t, which appear during the 23rd Dynasty (3rd Intermediate Period) and vanish early during the Ptolemaic dynasty. An extensive import of goods from Egypt to Mediterranean countries during the 1st millennium BC resulted in the local craft centers in Syria, Judea, Anatolia, Greece, Italy and island states copying the Egyptian technologies of manufacturing glass and faience and starting manufacture of their own goods with the imported technologies. Trace analysis and analysis of faience composition showed that the pendants from Filippovka and Novy Kumak had been manufactured following different Egyptian faience recipes. SEM and SEM/EDX analyses of the Filippovka pendant suggest a possibility that it was made in handicraft centers of the Eastern Mediterranean with a borrowed technology. L. T. Yablonsky has developed the original idea of the research, aimed at not only revealing the origin of imported items, but also identifying the purpose of these amulets in rituals of early nomads. The author has analyzed the semantics of the amulets’ image adopted in ancient Egypt, and the likely use of these amulets by nomads, made conclusions. O. V. Anikeeva has studied the iconography of amulets, their distribution among nomads, investigated the materials using natural-science methods.http://hfrir.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/1701early nomadsSouthern UralsWedjatthe Eye of HorusEgyptian faienceproduction technologychronologyorigin |
| spellingShingle | Olga V. Anikeeva [Leonid T. Yablonsky] Amulets Depicting the Eye of Horus from Burial Mounds of Early Nomads in the Southern Urals Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 4. История, регионоведение, международные отношения early nomads Southern Urals Wedjat the Eye of Horus Egyptian faience production technology chronology origin |
| title | Amulets Depicting the Eye of Horus from Burial Mounds of Early Nomads in the Southern Urals |
| title_full | Amulets Depicting the Eye of Horus from Burial Mounds of Early Nomads in the Southern Urals |
| title_fullStr | Amulets Depicting the Eye of Horus from Burial Mounds of Early Nomads in the Southern Urals |
| title_full_unstemmed | Amulets Depicting the Eye of Horus from Burial Mounds of Early Nomads in the Southern Urals |
| title_short | Amulets Depicting the Eye of Horus from Burial Mounds of Early Nomads in the Southern Urals |
| title_sort | amulets depicting the eye of horus from burial mounds of early nomads in the southern urals |
| topic | early nomads Southern Urals Wedjat the Eye of Horus Egyptian faience production technology chronology origin |
| url | http://hfrir.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/1701 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT olgavanikeeva amuletsdepictingtheeyeofhorusfromburialmoundsofearlynomadsinthesouthernurals AT leonidtyablonsky amuletsdepictingtheeyeofhorusfromburialmoundsofearlynomadsinthesouthernurals |