Marine Shaft Steels (AISI 4140 and AISI 5120) Predicted Fracture Toughness by FE Simulation

<p>Optimal selection of material can be considered as one of the most critical steps in engineering design process. That is especially emphasized when dealing with constructions that operate in marine environment; high stresses and harsh operating conditions assert the importance of proper mat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Goran VUKELIC, Josip BRNIC
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kaunas University of Technology 2017-02-01
Series:Medžiagotyra
Subjects:
Online Access:http://matsc.ktu.lt/index.php/MatSc/article/view/13823
_version_ 1818483591978418176
author Goran VUKELIC
Josip BRNIC
author_facet Goran VUKELIC
Josip BRNIC
author_sort Goran VUKELIC
collection DOAJ
description <p>Optimal selection of material can be considered as one of the most critical steps in engineering design process. That is especially emphasized when dealing with constructions that operate in marine environment; high stresses and harsh operating conditions assert the importance of proper material characterization before its selection. This paper presents comparison of two types of steel usually used in marine shaft manufacturing, chromium-molybdenum steel AISI 4140 and chromium low-alloy steel AISI 5120. Comparison was made using numerically determined <em>J</em>-integral, an important fracture mechanics parameter. <em>J</em>-integral values are determined numerically using finite element (FE) stress analysis results of compact tensile (CT) and single-edge notched bend (SENB) type specimens usually used in standardized <em>J</em>-integral experimental procedures. Obtained <em>J</em> values are plotted versus specimen crack growth values (Δ<em>a</em>) for different specimen geometries (<em>a/W</em>). Higher resulting values of <em>J</em>-integral for AISI 5120 than AISI 4140 can be noticed. Also, higher <em>a/W</em> ratios correspond to lower <em>J</em>-integral values of materials and vice versa. In addition to that, <em>J</em>-integral values obtained by using FE model of CT specimen give somewhat conservative results when compared with ones obtained by FE model of SENB specimen. Although this procedure differs from experimental analysis, results can be used a suitable fracture parameter value in fracture toughness assessment.</p><p>DOI: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.ms.23.1.13823">http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.ms.23.1.13823</a></p>
first_indexed 2024-12-10T15:43:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5cb98c2d2d8046e08bb90d0e6b51f600
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1392-1320
2029-7289
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T15:43:54Z
publishDate 2017-02-01
publisher Kaunas University of Technology
record_format Article
series Medžiagotyra
spelling doaj.art-5cb98c2d2d8046e08bb90d0e6b51f6002022-12-22T01:43:02ZengKaunas University of TechnologyMedžiagotyra1392-13202029-72892017-02-01231162010.5755/j01.ms.23.1.138238348Marine Shaft Steels (AISI 4140 and AISI 5120) Predicted Fracture Toughness by FE SimulationGoran VUKELIC0Josip BRNIC1Faculty of Maritime Studies Rijeka, University of Rijeka, CroatiaFaculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka, Croatia<p>Optimal selection of material can be considered as one of the most critical steps in engineering design process. That is especially emphasized when dealing with constructions that operate in marine environment; high stresses and harsh operating conditions assert the importance of proper material characterization before its selection. This paper presents comparison of two types of steel usually used in marine shaft manufacturing, chromium-molybdenum steel AISI 4140 and chromium low-alloy steel AISI 5120. Comparison was made using numerically determined <em>J</em>-integral, an important fracture mechanics parameter. <em>J</em>-integral values are determined numerically using finite element (FE) stress analysis results of compact tensile (CT) and single-edge notched bend (SENB) type specimens usually used in standardized <em>J</em>-integral experimental procedures. Obtained <em>J</em> values are plotted versus specimen crack growth values (Δ<em>a</em>) for different specimen geometries (<em>a/W</em>). Higher resulting values of <em>J</em>-integral for AISI 5120 than AISI 4140 can be noticed. Also, higher <em>a/W</em> ratios correspond to lower <em>J</em>-integral values of materials and vice versa. In addition to that, <em>J</em>-integral values obtained by using FE model of CT specimen give somewhat conservative results when compared with ones obtained by FE model of SENB specimen. Although this procedure differs from experimental analysis, results can be used a suitable fracture parameter value in fracture toughness assessment.</p><p>DOI: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.ms.23.1.13823">http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.ms.23.1.13823</a></p>http://matsc.ktu.lt/index.php/MatSc/article/view/13823AISI 4140, AISI 5120, marine steel, fracture
spellingShingle Goran VUKELIC
Josip BRNIC
Marine Shaft Steels (AISI 4140 and AISI 5120) Predicted Fracture Toughness by FE Simulation
Medžiagotyra
AISI 4140, AISI 5120, marine steel, fracture
title Marine Shaft Steels (AISI 4140 and AISI 5120) Predicted Fracture Toughness by FE Simulation
title_full Marine Shaft Steels (AISI 4140 and AISI 5120) Predicted Fracture Toughness by FE Simulation
title_fullStr Marine Shaft Steels (AISI 4140 and AISI 5120) Predicted Fracture Toughness by FE Simulation
title_full_unstemmed Marine Shaft Steels (AISI 4140 and AISI 5120) Predicted Fracture Toughness by FE Simulation
title_short Marine Shaft Steels (AISI 4140 and AISI 5120) Predicted Fracture Toughness by FE Simulation
title_sort marine shaft steels aisi 4140 and aisi 5120 predicted fracture toughness by fe simulation
topic AISI 4140, AISI 5120, marine steel, fracture
url http://matsc.ktu.lt/index.php/MatSc/article/view/13823
work_keys_str_mv AT goranvukelic marineshaftsteelsaisi4140andaisi5120predictedfracturetoughnessbyfesimulation
AT josipbrnic marineshaftsteelsaisi4140andaisi5120predictedfracturetoughnessbyfesimulation