The natural history of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women: a multi-parameter evidence synthesis

Background and objectives: The evidence base supporting the National Chlamydia Screening Programme, initiated in 2003, has been questioned repeatedly, with little consensus on modelling assumptions, parameter values or evidence sources to be used in cost-effectiveness analyses. The purpose of this p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Malcolm J Price, AE Ades, Kate Soldan, Nicky J Welton, John Macleod, Ian Simms, Daniela DeAngelis, Katherine ME Turner, Paddy J Horner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: NIHR Journals Library 2016-03-01
Series:Health Technology Assessment
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3310/hta20220
_version_ 1828401147940962304
author Malcolm J Price
AE Ades
Kate Soldan
Nicky J Welton
John Macleod
Ian Simms
Daniela DeAngelis
Katherine ME Turner
Paddy J Horner
author_facet Malcolm J Price
AE Ades
Kate Soldan
Nicky J Welton
John Macleod
Ian Simms
Daniela DeAngelis
Katherine ME Turner
Paddy J Horner
author_sort Malcolm J Price
collection DOAJ
description Background and objectives: The evidence base supporting the National Chlamydia Screening Programme, initiated in 2003, has been questioned repeatedly, with little consensus on modelling assumptions, parameter values or evidence sources to be used in cost-effectiveness analyses. The purpose of this project was to assemble all available evidence on the prevalence and incidence of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) in the UK and its sequelae, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), ectopic pregnancy (EP) and tubal factor infertility (TFI) to review the evidence base in its entirety, assess its consistency and, if possible, arrive at a coherent set of estimates consistent with all the evidence. Methods: Evidence was identified using ‘high-yield’ strategies. Bayesian Multi-Parameter Evidence Synthesis models were constructed for separate subparts of the clinical and population epidemiology of CT. Where possible, different types of data sources were statistically combined to derive coherent estimates. Where evidence was inconsistent, evidence sources were re-interpreted and new estimates derived on a post-hoc basis. Results: An internally coherent set of estimates was generated, consistent with a multifaceted evidence base, fertility surveys and routine UK statistics on PID and EP. Among the key findings were that the risk of PID (symptomatic or asymptomatic) following an untreated CT infection is 17.1% [95% credible interval (CrI) 6% to 29%] and the risk of salpingitis is 7.3% (95% CrI 2.2% to 14.0%). In women aged 16–24 years, screened at annual intervals, at best, 61% (95% CrI 55% to 67%) of CT-related PID and 22% (95% CrI 7% to 43%) of all PID could be directly prevented. For women aged 16–44 years, the proportions of PID, EP and TFI that are attributable to CT are estimated to be 20% (95% CrI 6% to 38%), 4.9% (95% CrI 1.2% to 12%) and 29% (95% CrI 9% to 56%), respectively. The prevalence of TFI in the UK in women at the end of their reproductive lives is 1.1%: this is consistent with all PID carrying a relatively high risk of reproductive damage, whether diagnosed or not. Every 1000 CT infections in women aged 16–44 years, on average, gives rise to approximately 171 episodes of PID and 73 of salpingitis, 2.0 EPs and 5.1 women with TFI at age 44 years. Conclusions and research recommendations: The study establishes a set of interpretations of the major studies and study designs, under which a coherent set of estimates can be generated. CT is a significant cause of PID and TFI. CT screening is of benefit to the individual, but detection and treatment of incident infection may be more beneficial. Women with lower abdominal pain need better advice on when to seek early medical attention to avoid risk of reproductive damage. The study provides new insights into the reproductive risks of PID and the role of CT. Further research is required on the proportions of PID, EP and TFI attributable to CT to confirm predictions made in this report, and to improve the precision of key estimates. The cost-effectiveness of screening should be re-evaluated using the findings of this report. Funding: The Medical Research Council grant G0801947.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T09:43:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5cba4b4a87454b9e9416cafa008336bc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1366-5278
2046-4924
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T09:43:00Z
publishDate 2016-03-01
publisher NIHR Journals Library
record_format Article
series Health Technology Assessment
spelling doaj.art-5cba4b4a87454b9e9416cafa008336bc2022-12-22T01:53:56ZengNIHR Journals LibraryHealth Technology Assessment1366-52782046-49242016-03-01202210.3310/hta2022006/98/02The natural history of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women: a multi-parameter evidence synthesisMalcolm J Price0AE Ades1Kate Soldan2Nicky J Welton3John Macleod4Ian Simms5Daniela DeAngelis6Katherine ME Turner7Paddy J Horner8Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UKSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UKPublic Health England (formerly Health Protection Agency), Colindale, London, UKSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UKSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UKPublic Health England (formerly Health Protection Agency), Colindale, London, UKPublic Health England (formerly Health Protection Agency), Colindale, London, UKSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UKSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UKBackground and objectives: The evidence base supporting the National Chlamydia Screening Programme, initiated in 2003, has been questioned repeatedly, with little consensus on modelling assumptions, parameter values or evidence sources to be used in cost-effectiveness analyses. The purpose of this project was to assemble all available evidence on the prevalence and incidence of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) in the UK and its sequelae, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), ectopic pregnancy (EP) and tubal factor infertility (TFI) to review the evidence base in its entirety, assess its consistency and, if possible, arrive at a coherent set of estimates consistent with all the evidence. Methods: Evidence was identified using ‘high-yield’ strategies. Bayesian Multi-Parameter Evidence Synthesis models were constructed for separate subparts of the clinical and population epidemiology of CT. Where possible, different types of data sources were statistically combined to derive coherent estimates. Where evidence was inconsistent, evidence sources were re-interpreted and new estimates derived on a post-hoc basis. Results: An internally coherent set of estimates was generated, consistent with a multifaceted evidence base, fertility surveys and routine UK statistics on PID and EP. Among the key findings were that the risk of PID (symptomatic or asymptomatic) following an untreated CT infection is 17.1% [95% credible interval (CrI) 6% to 29%] and the risk of salpingitis is 7.3% (95% CrI 2.2% to 14.0%). In women aged 16–24 years, screened at annual intervals, at best, 61% (95% CrI 55% to 67%) of CT-related PID and 22% (95% CrI 7% to 43%) of all PID could be directly prevented. For women aged 16–44 years, the proportions of PID, EP and TFI that are attributable to CT are estimated to be 20% (95% CrI 6% to 38%), 4.9% (95% CrI 1.2% to 12%) and 29% (95% CrI 9% to 56%), respectively. The prevalence of TFI in the UK in women at the end of their reproductive lives is 1.1%: this is consistent with all PID carrying a relatively high risk of reproductive damage, whether diagnosed or not. Every 1000 CT infections in women aged 16–44 years, on average, gives rise to approximately 171 episodes of PID and 73 of salpingitis, 2.0 EPs and 5.1 women with TFI at age 44 years. Conclusions and research recommendations: The study establishes a set of interpretations of the major studies and study designs, under which a coherent set of estimates can be generated. CT is a significant cause of PID and TFI. CT screening is of benefit to the individual, but detection and treatment of incident infection may be more beneficial. Women with lower abdominal pain need better advice on when to seek early medical attention to avoid risk of reproductive damage. The study provides new insights into the reproductive risks of PID and the role of CT. Further research is required on the proportions of PID, EP and TFI attributable to CT to confirm predictions made in this report, and to improve the precision of key estimates. The cost-effectiveness of screening should be re-evaluated using the findings of this report. Funding: The Medical Research Council grant G0801947.https://doi.org/10.3310/hta20220chlamydia trachomatisnatural historyinfectionwomenmulti-parameter evidence synthesispelvic inflammatory diseaseectopic pregnancyinfertility
spellingShingle Malcolm J Price
AE Ades
Kate Soldan
Nicky J Welton
John Macleod
Ian Simms
Daniela DeAngelis
Katherine ME Turner
Paddy J Horner
The natural history of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women: a multi-parameter evidence synthesis
Health Technology Assessment
chlamydia trachomatis
natural history
infection
women
multi-parameter evidence synthesis
pelvic inflammatory disease
ectopic pregnancy
infertility
title The natural history of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women: a multi-parameter evidence synthesis
title_full The natural history of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women: a multi-parameter evidence synthesis
title_fullStr The natural history of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women: a multi-parameter evidence synthesis
title_full_unstemmed The natural history of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women: a multi-parameter evidence synthesis
title_short The natural history of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women: a multi-parameter evidence synthesis
title_sort natural history of chlamydia trachomatis infection in women a multi parameter evidence synthesis
topic chlamydia trachomatis
natural history
infection
women
multi-parameter evidence synthesis
pelvic inflammatory disease
ectopic pregnancy
infertility
url https://doi.org/10.3310/hta20220
work_keys_str_mv AT malcolmjprice thenaturalhistoryofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioninwomenamultiparameterevidencesynthesis
AT aeades thenaturalhistoryofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioninwomenamultiparameterevidencesynthesis
AT katesoldan thenaturalhistoryofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioninwomenamultiparameterevidencesynthesis
AT nickyjwelton thenaturalhistoryofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioninwomenamultiparameterevidencesynthesis
AT johnmacleod thenaturalhistoryofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioninwomenamultiparameterevidencesynthesis
AT iansimms thenaturalhistoryofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioninwomenamultiparameterevidencesynthesis
AT danieladeangelis thenaturalhistoryofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioninwomenamultiparameterevidencesynthesis
AT katherinemeturner thenaturalhistoryofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioninwomenamultiparameterevidencesynthesis
AT paddyjhorner thenaturalhistoryofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioninwomenamultiparameterevidencesynthesis
AT malcolmjprice naturalhistoryofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioninwomenamultiparameterevidencesynthesis
AT aeades naturalhistoryofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioninwomenamultiparameterevidencesynthesis
AT katesoldan naturalhistoryofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioninwomenamultiparameterevidencesynthesis
AT nickyjwelton naturalhistoryofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioninwomenamultiparameterevidencesynthesis
AT johnmacleod naturalhistoryofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioninwomenamultiparameterevidencesynthesis
AT iansimms naturalhistoryofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioninwomenamultiparameterevidencesynthesis
AT danieladeangelis naturalhistoryofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioninwomenamultiparameterevidencesynthesis
AT katherinemeturner naturalhistoryofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioninwomenamultiparameterevidencesynthesis
AT paddyjhorner naturalhistoryofchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioninwomenamultiparameterevidencesynthesis