Quality assessment and factor analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of endoscopic ultrasound diagnosis.
Comprehensive monitoring of the quality of systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) requires complete and accurate reporting and methodology.To assess the reporting and methodological quality of SRs/MAs on EUS diagnosis and to explore the potential factors infl...
Main Authors: | Danlu Liu, Jiaxin Jin, Jinhui Tian, Kehu Yang |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2015-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4408104?pdf=render |
Similar Items
-
Reporting quality of systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture.
by: Yali Liu, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration versus Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Biopsy for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by: Galab M. Hassan, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01) -
Reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture: the PRISMA for acupuncture checklist
by: Xiaoqin Wang, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01) -
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage to abdominal abscess: A systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Sifan Liu, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01) -
Endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis
by: Julio Iglesias-García, et al.
Published: (2015-04-01)