An Equity Autopsy: Exploring the Role of Water Rights in Water Allocations and Impacts for the Central Valley Project during the 2012–2016 California Drought

Entrenched Western water rights regimes may appear to function relatively well in wet years, but extreme drought events can expose the kinds of harsh ecological and socio-economic outcomes that the hard edges of prior appropriation inherently generate. During the 2012–2016 California drought some ir...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zachary P. Sugg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-02-01
Series:Resources
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/7/1/12
_version_ 1828357715874807808
author Zachary P. Sugg
author_facet Zachary P. Sugg
author_sort Zachary P. Sugg
collection DOAJ
description Entrenched Western water rights regimes may appear to function relatively well in wet years, but extreme drought events can expose the kinds of harsh ecological and socio-economic outcomes that the hard edges of prior appropriation inherently generate. During the 2012–2016 California drought some irrigators received little or no water at all in consecutive years while others received comparatively large allocations. This paper focuses on the role that California’s water rights priority system and its administration via Central Valley Project contracts have played in generating disproportionate water allocations and impacts during the drought. The analysis is structured around two key questions: (a) in what ways does strict adherence to a priority system of water allocations produce inequitable socio-ecological outcomes during severe drought? (b) how might the system be changed to foster outcomes that are more equitable and fair, and with less costly and less serious conflicts in a non-stationary climate future marked by extreme events? Using an equity perspective, I draw from the doctrine of equitable apportionment to imagine a water rights regime that is better able to create a fairer distribution of drought impacts while meaningfully elevating the importance of future generations and increasing adaptive capacity.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T03:20:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5cd9579f51a64ba7892aa4f958c0d267
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2079-9276
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T03:20:01Z
publishDate 2018-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Resources
spelling doaj.art-5cd9579f51a64ba7892aa4f958c0d2672022-12-22T02:15:21ZengMDPI AGResources2079-92762018-02-01711210.3390/resources7010012resources7010012An Equity Autopsy: Exploring the Role of Water Rights in Water Allocations and Impacts for the Central Valley Project during the 2012–2016 California DroughtZachary P. Sugg0Martin Daniel Gould Center for Conflict Resolution, Stanford Law School, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USAEntrenched Western water rights regimes may appear to function relatively well in wet years, but extreme drought events can expose the kinds of harsh ecological and socio-economic outcomes that the hard edges of prior appropriation inherently generate. During the 2012–2016 California drought some irrigators received little or no water at all in consecutive years while others received comparatively large allocations. This paper focuses on the role that California’s water rights priority system and its administration via Central Valley Project contracts have played in generating disproportionate water allocations and impacts during the drought. The analysis is structured around two key questions: (a) in what ways does strict adherence to a priority system of water allocations produce inequitable socio-ecological outcomes during severe drought? (b) how might the system be changed to foster outcomes that are more equitable and fair, and with less costly and less serious conflicts in a non-stationary climate future marked by extreme events? Using an equity perspective, I draw from the doctrine of equitable apportionment to imagine a water rights regime that is better able to create a fairer distribution of drought impacts while meaningfully elevating the importance of future generations and increasing adaptive capacity.http://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/7/1/12water lawCaliforniadroughtequityCentral Valley Projectwater rightsprior appropriation
spellingShingle Zachary P. Sugg
An Equity Autopsy: Exploring the Role of Water Rights in Water Allocations and Impacts for the Central Valley Project during the 2012–2016 California Drought
Resources
water law
California
drought
equity
Central Valley Project
water rights
prior appropriation
title An Equity Autopsy: Exploring the Role of Water Rights in Water Allocations and Impacts for the Central Valley Project during the 2012–2016 California Drought
title_full An Equity Autopsy: Exploring the Role of Water Rights in Water Allocations and Impacts for the Central Valley Project during the 2012–2016 California Drought
title_fullStr An Equity Autopsy: Exploring the Role of Water Rights in Water Allocations and Impacts for the Central Valley Project during the 2012–2016 California Drought
title_full_unstemmed An Equity Autopsy: Exploring the Role of Water Rights in Water Allocations and Impacts for the Central Valley Project during the 2012–2016 California Drought
title_short An Equity Autopsy: Exploring the Role of Water Rights in Water Allocations and Impacts for the Central Valley Project during the 2012–2016 California Drought
title_sort equity autopsy exploring the role of water rights in water allocations and impacts for the central valley project during the 2012 2016 california drought
topic water law
California
drought
equity
Central Valley Project
water rights
prior appropriation
url http://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/7/1/12
work_keys_str_mv AT zacharypsugg anequityautopsyexploringtheroleofwaterrightsinwaterallocationsandimpactsforthecentralvalleyprojectduringthe20122016californiadrought
AT zacharypsugg equityautopsyexploringtheroleofwaterrightsinwaterallocationsandimpactsforthecentralvalleyprojectduringthe20122016californiadrought