| Summary: | Introduction
Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) have recently emerged
as a public health threat globally. Despite the low proportion of e-cigarette users
(1.22%) reported in the Global Adult Tobacco Survey-2, the Government of India
enacted the Prohibition of E-cigarettes Act 2019 (PECA), prohibiting all forms of
ENDS/ENNDS. The current analysis presents nationally representative findings on
the level of awareness of e-cigarettes in India and its correlates and characteristics
of those aware of e-cigarettes.
Methods: The current secondary analysis from GATS-2 among adults aged 15 years and above from all states and Union Territories (UTs) of India used a standard protocol for data collection & management. A multi-stage cluster sampling design was used. The respondents who were aware of e-cigarettes were included (n=2524). Binomial Logistic regression analysis was conducted, and adjusted odds ratios (aOR), with 95% CI, were calculated to measure the associations between independent and dependent variables.
Results: 3.4% of the respondents were aware (either heard or seen) of e-cigarettes and their awareness was found significantly higher among males (aOR=2.07; 95%CI= 1.90-2.24), urban population (aOR=2.83, 95%CI=2.61-3.07), higher education (aOR=0.41, 95%CI=0.38-0.45).
Conclusion: Public awareness campaigns about the harms of e-cigarettes and the law (PECA) need to be rolled out in urban and rural areas. Capacity-building exercises of implementers and enforcers at the grassroots level could also support communicating the harms to hard-to-reach groups. Further, regular compliance monitoring of the legislation and prosecution of violators would facilitate its effective implementation at the national and sub-national levels.
Methods
The current secondary analysis from GATS-2 among adults aged ≥15 years
from all states and Union Territories of India used a standard protocol for data
collection and management. A multi-stage cluster sampling design was used. The
respondents who were aware of e-cigarettes were included (n=2524). Binomial
logistic regression analysis was conducted, and adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with
95% CI, were calculated to measure the associations between independent and
dependent variables.
Results
Only 3.4% of the respondents were aware (either heard or seen) of e-cigarettes
and their awareness was found significantly higher among males (AOR=2.07; 95%
CI: 1.90–2.24), urban population (AOR=2.83; 95% CI: 2.61–3.07), and higher
education (AOR=0.41; 95% CI: 0.38–0.45).
Conclusions
Public awareness campaigns about the harms of e-cigarettes and the
law (PECA) need to be rolled out in urban and rural areas. Capacity-building
exercises of implementers and enforcers at the grassroots level could also support
communicating the harms to hard-to-reach groups. Further, regular compliance
monitoring of the legislation and prosecution of violators would facilitate its effective
implementation at the national and sub-national levels.
|
|---|