Effect of a standardised heart team protocol versus a guideline-based protocol on revascularisation decision stability in stable complex coronary artery disease: rationale and design of a randomised trial of cardiology specialists using historic cases
Introduction A multidisciplinary heart team approach has been recommended by revascularisation guidelines, but how to organise and implement the heart team in a standardised way has not been validated. Inter-team and intra-team decision instability existed in the guideline-based heart team protocol,...
Main Authors: | Yang Wang, Xi Li, Bo Xu, Zhe Zheng, Shen Lin, Hanping Ma |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022-12-01
|
Series: | BMJ Open |
Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/12/e064761.full |
Similar Items
-
Protocol for the Arterial Revascularisation Trial (ART). A randomised trial to compare survival following bilateral versus single internal mammary grafting in coronary revascularisation [ISRCTN46552265].
by: Taggart, D, et al.
Published: (2006) -
Impact of a comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation programme versus coronary revascularisation in patients with stable angina pectoris: study protocol for the PRO-FIT randomised controlled trial
by: Joyce M. Heutinck, et al.
Published: (2023-05-01) -
The 2010 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularisation.
by: Taggart, D, et al.
Published: (2011) -
An internationally standardised antisaccade protocol.
by: Antoniades, C, et al.
Published: (2013) -
Protocol for the PACE trial: A randomised controlled trial of adaptive pacing, cognitive behaviour therapy, and graded exercise as supplements to standardised specialist medical care versus standardised specialist medical care alone for patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis or encephalopathy
by: White, P, et al.
Published: (2007)