Validation of the Turkish version of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score 11 (ObsQoR-11T) after cesarean delivery
Abstract Background To translate and validate the psychometric characteristics of a Turkish version of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score 11 tool used to measure post-cesarean delivery recovery in Turkish-speaking patients. Methods After the original English version of the Obstetric Quality-of-...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2022-11-01
|
| Series: | Health and Quality of Life Outcomes |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-022-02073-y |
| _version_ | 1811207906019770368 |
|---|---|
| author | Gökhan Ozkan Umut Kara Mehmet Emin Ince Ozhan Ozdemir Mustafa Ulubay Serkan Senkal |
| author_facet | Gökhan Ozkan Umut Kara Mehmet Emin Ince Ozhan Ozdemir Mustafa Ulubay Serkan Senkal |
| author_sort | Gökhan Ozkan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background To translate and validate the psychometric characteristics of a Turkish version of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score 11 tool used to measure post-cesarean delivery recovery in Turkish-speaking patients. Methods After the original English version of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score 11 tool was translated into Turkish; it was psychometrically validated to assess the post-cesarean delivery quality of recovery. Validity, reliability, and feasibility were investigated. The Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score 11 tool was administered to Turkish-speaking patients on postoperative day 1. On postoperative day 1, a global health visual analog scale was used to assess the patient's perceived global recovery. Results One hundred and eighty-six patients completed their questionnaires, providing a completion rate of 97.38%. The Spearman rho (ρ) correlation coefficient between the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score and global health visual analog scale (0–100 points) was 0.850 at postoperative day 1 following surgery (P < 0.001). Internal consistency, measured using Cronbach’s alpha, was 0.822. The split-half coefficient was 0.708. The Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score differed significantly between the emergency and elective cesarean delivery groups (80 (41–104) vs. 83.3 (51–102); P < 0.05). The test–retest reliability of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score items was more than 0.6 in 82% of cases, indicating good repeatability and reliability. Conclusion The Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score 11 is a valid and reliable tool to measure the post-cesarean quality of recovery in Turkish-speaking patients. The psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the scale to measure the post-cesarean quality of recovery were similar to those of the seminal English version. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T04:12:59Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-5cfe8303174c4a07b13d3be4cf523f6d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1477-7525 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T04:12:59Z |
| publishDate | 2022-11-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Health and Quality of Life Outcomes |
| spelling | doaj.art-5cfe8303174c4a07b13d3be4cf523f6d2022-12-22T03:48:27ZengBMCHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes1477-75252022-11-0120111110.1186/s12955-022-02073-yValidation of the Turkish version of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score 11 (ObsQoR-11T) after cesarean deliveryGökhan Ozkan0Umut Kara1Mehmet Emin Ince2Ozhan Ozdemir3Mustafa Ulubay4Serkan Senkal5Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, University of Health SciencesDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, University of Health SciencesDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, University of Health SciencesDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, University of Health SciencesDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, University of Health SciencesDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, University of Health SciencesAbstract Background To translate and validate the psychometric characteristics of a Turkish version of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score 11 tool used to measure post-cesarean delivery recovery in Turkish-speaking patients. Methods After the original English version of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score 11 tool was translated into Turkish; it was psychometrically validated to assess the post-cesarean delivery quality of recovery. Validity, reliability, and feasibility were investigated. The Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score 11 tool was administered to Turkish-speaking patients on postoperative day 1. On postoperative day 1, a global health visual analog scale was used to assess the patient's perceived global recovery. Results One hundred and eighty-six patients completed their questionnaires, providing a completion rate of 97.38%. The Spearman rho (ρ) correlation coefficient between the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score and global health visual analog scale (0–100 points) was 0.850 at postoperative day 1 following surgery (P < 0.001). Internal consistency, measured using Cronbach’s alpha, was 0.822. The split-half coefficient was 0.708. The Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score differed significantly between the emergency and elective cesarean delivery groups (80 (41–104) vs. 83.3 (51–102); P < 0.05). The test–retest reliability of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score items was more than 0.6 in 82% of cases, indicating good repeatability and reliability. Conclusion The Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score 11 is a valid and reliable tool to measure the post-cesarean quality of recovery in Turkish-speaking patients. The psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the scale to measure the post-cesarean quality of recovery were similar to those of the seminal English version.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-022-02073-yCesarean deliveryCross-cultural comparisonPatient-reported measuresQuality of recoveryRecoveryPostoperative |
| spellingShingle | Gökhan Ozkan Umut Kara Mehmet Emin Ince Ozhan Ozdemir Mustafa Ulubay Serkan Senkal Validation of the Turkish version of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score 11 (ObsQoR-11T) after cesarean delivery Health and Quality of Life Outcomes Cesarean delivery Cross-cultural comparison Patient-reported measures Quality of recovery Recovery Postoperative |
| title | Validation of the Turkish version of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score 11 (ObsQoR-11T) after cesarean delivery |
| title_full | Validation of the Turkish version of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score 11 (ObsQoR-11T) after cesarean delivery |
| title_fullStr | Validation of the Turkish version of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score 11 (ObsQoR-11T) after cesarean delivery |
| title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the Turkish version of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score 11 (ObsQoR-11T) after cesarean delivery |
| title_short | Validation of the Turkish version of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score 11 (ObsQoR-11T) after cesarean delivery |
| title_sort | validation of the turkish version of the obstetric quality of recovery score 11 obsqor 11t after cesarean delivery |
| topic | Cesarean delivery Cross-cultural comparison Patient-reported measures Quality of recovery Recovery Postoperative |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-022-02073-y |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gokhanozkan validationoftheturkishversionoftheobstetricqualityofrecoveryscore11obsqor11taftercesareandelivery AT umutkara validationoftheturkishversionoftheobstetricqualityofrecoveryscore11obsqor11taftercesareandelivery AT mehmeteminince validationoftheturkishversionoftheobstetricqualityofrecoveryscore11obsqor11taftercesareandelivery AT ozhanozdemir validationoftheturkishversionoftheobstetricqualityofrecoveryscore11obsqor11taftercesareandelivery AT mustafaulubay validationoftheturkishversionoftheobstetricqualityofrecoveryscore11obsqor11taftercesareandelivery AT serkansenkal validationoftheturkishversionoftheobstetricqualityofrecoveryscore11obsqor11taftercesareandelivery |