DIFFERENCES IN THE SATISFACTION AND FRUSTRATION OF BASIC NEEDS BASED ON EMPLOYMENT STATUS

Although research on the benefits or constraints of working while studying began several decades ago, the differences in employment (student/work) groups are still under-researched. This study is based on the presumption that student/work status creates different possibilities for the satisfaction o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aistė Diržytė, Aleksandras Patapas, Erika Aidukaitė, Agnė Vilčinskaitė, Gabija Skučaitė
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mykolas Romeris University 2022-09-01
Series:Public Policy and Administration
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.mruni.eu/ojs/public-policy-and-administration/article/view/7204
_version_ 1811210964765245440
author Aistė Diržytė
Aleksandras Patapas
Erika Aidukaitė
Agnė Vilčinskaitė
Gabija Skučaitė
author_facet Aistė Diržytė
Aleksandras Patapas
Erika Aidukaitė
Agnė Vilčinskaitė
Gabija Skučaitė
author_sort Aistė Diržytė
collection DOAJ
description Although research on the benefits or constraints of working while studying began several decades ago, the differences in employment (student/work) groups are still under-researched. This study is based on the presumption that student/work status creates different possibilities for the satisfaction or frustration of the basic psychological needs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. It aims to explore differences in basic needs, satisfaction, and frustration in different employment groups (whether a person is only working, only studying, working and studying, or not working and not studying). It is hypothesized that the four student/work status groups differ regarding the satisfaction and frustration of basic needs. The study sample included 286 participants from the youth age group, according to the World Health Organization’s 2015 updated age classification standards. Respondents were aged 18 to 44 years, with a mean age of 28.7 years (SD = 6.963); 52.1% of respondents (n = 149) were solely employed, 12.9% solely studied (n = 37), 16.8% both worked and studied (n = 48), and 18.2% neither worked nor studied (n = 52); 41.3% of respondents were male (n = 118) and 58.7% were female (n = 168). This study applied a Lithuanian-translated version of The Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction & Frustration Scale (BPNSFS), which assesses the satisfaction and frustration of the needs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. This study partially confirmed the hypothesis that the satisfaction and frustration of basic psychological needs differ depending on a person’s employment (student/work) status. This research also demonstrated a statistically significant difference in the frustration of the need for autonomy between the respondents solely studying and solely working, and between those not working and not studying. Data on the satisfaction and frustration of relatedness and competence did not differ significantly between the employment (student/work) status groups. However, due to the limitations implied by the relatively small and non-representative sample size, these findings should be regarded with concern and should be researched further. This study is important as it adds value to the knowledge of factors in students’ quality of life, which are important for public policy related to higher education and employment.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T05:04:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5d0f46237fc846479fe3f1c1117e9c1d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1648-2603
2029-2872
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T05:04:53Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Mykolas Romeris University
record_format Article
series Public Policy and Administration
spelling doaj.art-5d0f46237fc846479fe3f1c1117e9c1d2022-12-22T03:46:54ZengMykolas Romeris UniversityPublic Policy and Administration1648-26032029-28722022-09-0121210.13165/VPA-22-21-2-03 DIFFERENCES IN THE SATISFACTION AND FRUSTRATION OF BASIC NEEDS BASED ON EMPLOYMENT STATUS Aistė DiržytėAleksandras PatapasErika AidukaitėAgnė VilčinskaitėGabija SkučaitėAlthough research on the benefits or constraints of working while studying began several decades ago, the differences in employment (student/work) groups are still under-researched. This study is based on the presumption that student/work status creates different possibilities for the satisfaction or frustration of the basic psychological needs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. It aims to explore differences in basic needs, satisfaction, and frustration in different employment groups (whether a person is only working, only studying, working and studying, or not working and not studying). It is hypothesized that the four student/work status groups differ regarding the satisfaction and frustration of basic needs. The study sample included 286 participants from the youth age group, according to the World Health Organization’s 2015 updated age classification standards. Respondents were aged 18 to 44 years, with a mean age of 28.7 years (SD = 6.963); 52.1% of respondents (n = 149) were solely employed, 12.9% solely studied (n = 37), 16.8% both worked and studied (n = 48), and 18.2% neither worked nor studied (n = 52); 41.3% of respondents were male (n = 118) and 58.7% were female (n = 168). This study applied a Lithuanian-translated version of The Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction & Frustration Scale (BPNSFS), which assesses the satisfaction and frustration of the needs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. This study partially confirmed the hypothesis that the satisfaction and frustration of basic psychological needs differ depending on a person’s employment (student/work) status. This research also demonstrated a statistically significant difference in the frustration of the need for autonomy between the respondents solely studying and solely working, and between those not working and not studying. Data on the satisfaction and frustration of relatedness and competence did not differ significantly between the employment (student/work) status groups. However, due to the limitations implied by the relatively small and non-representative sample size, these findings should be regarded with concern and should be researched further. This study is important as it adds value to the knowledge of factors in students’ quality of life, which are important for public policy related to higher education and employment.https://ojs.mruni.eu/ojs/public-policy-and-administration/article/view/7204employmentbasic needssatisfactionfrustration
spellingShingle Aistė Diržytė
Aleksandras Patapas
Erika Aidukaitė
Agnė Vilčinskaitė
Gabija Skučaitė
DIFFERENCES IN THE SATISFACTION AND FRUSTRATION OF BASIC NEEDS BASED ON EMPLOYMENT STATUS
Public Policy and Administration
employment
basic needs
satisfaction
frustration
title DIFFERENCES IN THE SATISFACTION AND FRUSTRATION OF BASIC NEEDS BASED ON EMPLOYMENT STATUS
title_full DIFFERENCES IN THE SATISFACTION AND FRUSTRATION OF BASIC NEEDS BASED ON EMPLOYMENT STATUS
title_fullStr DIFFERENCES IN THE SATISFACTION AND FRUSTRATION OF BASIC NEEDS BASED ON EMPLOYMENT STATUS
title_full_unstemmed DIFFERENCES IN THE SATISFACTION AND FRUSTRATION OF BASIC NEEDS BASED ON EMPLOYMENT STATUS
title_short DIFFERENCES IN THE SATISFACTION AND FRUSTRATION OF BASIC NEEDS BASED ON EMPLOYMENT STATUS
title_sort differences in the satisfaction and frustration of basic needs based on employment status
topic employment
basic needs
satisfaction
frustration
url https://ojs.mruni.eu/ojs/public-policy-and-administration/article/view/7204
work_keys_str_mv AT aistedirzyte differencesinthesatisfactionandfrustrationofbasicneedsbasedonemploymentstatus
AT aleksandraspatapas differencesinthesatisfactionandfrustrationofbasicneedsbasedonemploymentstatus
AT erikaaidukaite differencesinthesatisfactionandfrustrationofbasicneedsbasedonemploymentstatus
AT agnevilcinskaite differencesinthesatisfactionandfrustrationofbasicneedsbasedonemploymentstatus
AT gabijaskucaite differencesinthesatisfactionandfrustrationofbasicneedsbasedonemploymentstatus