The Accuracy Comparison Between Word2Vec and FastText On Sentiment Analysis of Hotel Reviews

Word embedding vectorization is more efficient than Bag-of-Word in word vector size. Word embedding also overcomes the loss of information related to sentence context, word order, and semantic relationships between words in sentences. Several kinds of Word Embedding are often considered for sentimen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Siti Khomsah, Rima Dias Ramadhani, Sena Wijaya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ikatan Ahli Informatika Indonesia 2022-06-01
Series:Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi)
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jurnal.iaii.or.id/index.php/RESTI/article/view/3711
_version_ 1797334602318086144
author Siti Khomsah
Rima Dias Ramadhani
Sena Wijaya
author_facet Siti Khomsah
Rima Dias Ramadhani
Sena Wijaya
author_sort Siti Khomsah
collection DOAJ
description Word embedding vectorization is more efficient than Bag-of-Word in word vector size. Word embedding also overcomes the loss of information related to sentence context, word order, and semantic relationships between words in sentences. Several kinds of Word Embedding are often considered for sentiment analysis, such as Word2Vec and FastText. Fast Text works on N-Gram, while Word2Vec is based on the word. This research aims to compare the accuracy of the sentiment analysis model using Word2Vec and FastText. Both models are tested in the sentiment analysis of Indonesian hotel reviews using the dataset from TripAdvisor.Word2Vec and FastText use the Skip-gram model. Both methods use the same parameters: number of features, minimum word count, number of parallel threads, and the context window size. Those vectorizers are combined by ensemble learning: Random Forest, Extra Tree, and AdaBoost. The Decision Tree is used as a baseline for measuring the performance of both models. The results showed that both FastText and Word2Vec well-to-do increase accuracy on Random Forest and Extra Tree. FastText reached higher accuracy than Word2Vec when using Extra Tree and Random Forest as classifiers. FastText leverage accuracy 8% (baseline: Decision Tree 85%), it is proofed by the accuracy of 93%, with 100 estimators.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T08:23:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5d0f9a3602674a319e69e358ca275f94
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2580-0760
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T08:23:27Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Ikatan Ahli Informatika Indonesia
record_format Article
series Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi)
spelling doaj.art-5d0f9a3602674a319e69e358ca275f942024-02-02T05:13:46ZengIkatan Ahli Informatika IndonesiaJurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi)2580-07602022-06-016335235810.29207/resti.v6i3.37113711The Accuracy Comparison Between Word2Vec and FastText On Sentiment Analysis of Hotel ReviewsSiti Khomsah0Rima Dias Ramadhani1Sena Wijaya2Institut Teknologi Telkom PurwokertoTelkom Institute of Technology Purwokerto Institut Teknologi Telkom PurwokertoWord embedding vectorization is more efficient than Bag-of-Word in word vector size. Word embedding also overcomes the loss of information related to sentence context, word order, and semantic relationships between words in sentences. Several kinds of Word Embedding are often considered for sentiment analysis, such as Word2Vec and FastText. Fast Text works on N-Gram, while Word2Vec is based on the word. This research aims to compare the accuracy of the sentiment analysis model using Word2Vec and FastText. Both models are tested in the sentiment analysis of Indonesian hotel reviews using the dataset from TripAdvisor.Word2Vec and FastText use the Skip-gram model. Both methods use the same parameters: number of features, minimum word count, number of parallel threads, and the context window size. Those vectorizers are combined by ensemble learning: Random Forest, Extra Tree, and AdaBoost. The Decision Tree is used as a baseline for measuring the performance of both models. The results showed that both FastText and Word2Vec well-to-do increase accuracy on Random Forest and Extra Tree. FastText reached higher accuracy than Word2Vec when using Extra Tree and Random Forest as classifiers. FastText leverage accuracy 8% (baseline: Decision Tree 85%), it is proofed by the accuracy of 93%, with 100 estimators.http://jurnal.iaii.or.id/index.php/RESTI/article/view/3711word2vec, fast text, sentiment analysis, hotel review
spellingShingle Siti Khomsah
Rima Dias Ramadhani
Sena Wijaya
The Accuracy Comparison Between Word2Vec and FastText On Sentiment Analysis of Hotel Reviews
Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi)
word2vec, fast text, sentiment analysis, hotel review
title The Accuracy Comparison Between Word2Vec and FastText On Sentiment Analysis of Hotel Reviews
title_full The Accuracy Comparison Between Word2Vec and FastText On Sentiment Analysis of Hotel Reviews
title_fullStr The Accuracy Comparison Between Word2Vec and FastText On Sentiment Analysis of Hotel Reviews
title_full_unstemmed The Accuracy Comparison Between Word2Vec and FastText On Sentiment Analysis of Hotel Reviews
title_short The Accuracy Comparison Between Word2Vec and FastText On Sentiment Analysis of Hotel Reviews
title_sort accuracy comparison between word2vec and fasttext on sentiment analysis of hotel reviews
topic word2vec, fast text, sentiment analysis, hotel review
url http://jurnal.iaii.or.id/index.php/RESTI/article/view/3711
work_keys_str_mv AT sitikhomsah theaccuracycomparisonbetweenword2vecandfasttextonsentimentanalysisofhotelreviews
AT rimadiasramadhani theaccuracycomparisonbetweenword2vecandfasttextonsentimentanalysisofhotelreviews
AT senawijaya theaccuracycomparisonbetweenword2vecandfasttextonsentimentanalysisofhotelreviews
AT sitikhomsah accuracycomparisonbetweenword2vecandfasttextonsentimentanalysisofhotelreviews
AT rimadiasramadhani accuracycomparisonbetweenword2vecandfasttextonsentimentanalysisofhotelreviews
AT senawijaya accuracycomparisonbetweenword2vecandfasttextonsentimentanalysisofhotelreviews