Why Austen, not Burney? Tracing the Mechanisms of Reputation and Legacy

During the 200th anniversary of Austen’s death in 2017, the narrative of Austen’s rise to fame and her ongoing celebrity circulated throughout modern culture. But how did this happen? When Austen died in 1817, it was not obvious that Austen would become the archetypal British woman writer. Frances B...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marilyn Francus
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Aphra Behn Society 2023-06-01
Series:ABO : Interactive Journal for Women in the Arts 1640-1830
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/abo/vol13/iss1/6
_version_ 1797799426253651968
author Marilyn Francus
author_facet Marilyn Francus
author_sort Marilyn Francus
collection DOAJ
description During the 200th anniversary of Austen’s death in 2017, the narrative of Austen’s rise to fame and her ongoing celebrity circulated throughout modern culture. But how did this happen? When Austen died in 1817, it was not obvious that Austen would become the archetypal British woman writer. Frances Burney was far more famous in her lifetime than Austen was in hers, and Burney’s novels (particularly Evelina and Cecilia) achieved as much, if not more, critical acclaim than Austen’s works. By comparing the afterlives of Jane Austen and Frances Burney, the factors that shape legacy come into focus—and scholars can use some of these factors to shape the legacy of British women writers today.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T04:19:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5d159c5e6a1545428732bdfa84054320
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2157-7129
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T04:19:40Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Aphra Behn Society
record_format Article
series ABO : Interactive Journal for Women in the Arts 1640-1830
spelling doaj.art-5d159c5e6a1545428732bdfa840543202023-06-20T14:01:19ZengAphra Behn SocietyABO : Interactive Journal for Women in the Arts 1640-18302157-71292023-06-01131http://doi.org/10.5038/2157-7129.13.1.1328Why Austen, not Burney? Tracing the Mechanisms of Reputation and LegacyMarilyn Francus0West Virginia UniversityDuring the 200th anniversary of Austen’s death in 2017, the narrative of Austen’s rise to fame and her ongoing celebrity circulated throughout modern culture. But how did this happen? When Austen died in 1817, it was not obvious that Austen would become the archetypal British woman writer. Frances Burney was far more famous in her lifetime than Austen was in hers, and Burney’s novels (particularly Evelina and Cecilia) achieved as much, if not more, critical acclaim than Austen’s works. By comparing the afterlives of Jane Austen and Frances Burney, the factors that shape legacy come into focus—and scholars can use some of these factors to shape the legacy of British women writers today.https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/abo/vol13/iss1/6legacypopular cultureliterary criticismaustenburney
spellingShingle Marilyn Francus
Why Austen, not Burney? Tracing the Mechanisms of Reputation and Legacy
ABO : Interactive Journal for Women in the Arts 1640-1830
legacy
popular culture
literary criticism
austen
burney
title Why Austen, not Burney? Tracing the Mechanisms of Reputation and Legacy
title_full Why Austen, not Burney? Tracing the Mechanisms of Reputation and Legacy
title_fullStr Why Austen, not Burney? Tracing the Mechanisms of Reputation and Legacy
title_full_unstemmed Why Austen, not Burney? Tracing the Mechanisms of Reputation and Legacy
title_short Why Austen, not Burney? Tracing the Mechanisms of Reputation and Legacy
title_sort why austen not burney tracing the mechanisms of reputation and legacy
topic legacy
popular culture
literary criticism
austen
burney
url https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/abo/vol13/iss1/6
work_keys_str_mv AT marilynfrancus whyaustennotburneytracingthemechanismsofreputationandlegacy