The impact of an anesthesia residency teaching service on anesthesia-controlled time and postsurgical patient outcomes: a retrospective observational study on 15,084 surgical cases
Abstract Background Limited data exists regarding the impact of anesthesia residents on operating room efficiency and patient safety outcomes. This investigation hypothesized that supervised anesthesiology residents do not increase anesthesia-controlled or prolonged extubation times compared to supe...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2024-04-01
|
| Series: | Patient Safety in Surgery |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-024-00394-z |
| _version_ | 1797219665096736768 |
|---|---|
| author | Davene Lynch Paul D. Mongan Amie L. Hoefnagel |
| author_facet | Davene Lynch Paul D. Mongan Amie L. Hoefnagel |
| author_sort | Davene Lynch |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background Limited data exists regarding the impact of anesthesia residents on operating room efficiency and patient safety outcomes. This investigation hypothesized that supervised anesthesiology residents do not increase anesthesia-controlled or prolonged extubation times compared to supervised certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNA)/certified anesthesiologist assistants (CAA) or anesthesiologists working independently. Secondary objectives included differences in critical outcomes such as intraoperative hypotension, cardiac and pulmonary complications, acute kidney injury, and mortality. Methods This retrospective single-center 24-month (January 1, 2020- December 31, 2021) cohort focused on primary outcomes of anesthesia-controlled times and prolonged extubation (>15 min) with additional assessment of secondary patient outcomes in adult patients having general anesthesia with an endotracheal tube or laryngeal mask airway for elective non-cardiac surgery. The study excluded sedation, obstetric, endoscopic, ophthalmology, and non-operating room procedures. Procedures were divided into three groups: anesthesiologists working solo, anesthesiologists supervising residents, or anesthesiologists supervising CRNA/CAAs. After univariate analysis, multivariable models were constructed to control for the univariate cofactor differences in the primary and secondary outcomes. Results A total of 15,084 surgical cases met the inclusion criteria for this study for the three different care models: solo anesthesiologists (1,204 cases), anesthesiologist/resident pairing (3,146 cases), and anesthesiologist/CRNA/CAA (14,040 cases). Before multivariate analysis, the resident group exhibited longer anesthesia-controlled times (median, [interquartile range], 26.1 [21.7–32.0], p < 0.001), compared to CRNA/CAA (23.9 [19.7–29.5]), and attending-only surgical cases (21.0 [17.9–25.4]). After adjusting for covariates in a general linear regression model (age, BMI, ASA classification, comorbidities, arterial line insertion, surgical service, and surgical location), there were no significant differences in the anesthesia-controlled times between the provider groups. Prolonged extubation times (>15 min) were significantly less common in the anesthesiologist-only group compared to the other groups (p < 0.001). Despite these time differences, there were no clinically significant differences among the groups in postoperative pulmonary or cardiac complications, renal impairment, or the 30-day mortality rate of patients. Conclusion Anesthesia residents do not increase anesthesia-controlled operating room times or adversely affect clinically relevant patient outcomes compared to anesthesiologists working independently or supervising certified registered nurse anesthetists or certified anesthesiologist assistants. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T12:37:15Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-5d2c372de0e8493caa1fcbcb05c0e2de |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1754-9493 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T12:37:15Z |
| publishDate | 2024-04-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Patient Safety in Surgery |
| spelling | doaj.art-5d2c372de0e8493caa1fcbcb05c0e2de2024-04-07T11:27:14ZengBMCPatient Safety in Surgery1754-94932024-04-0118111010.1186/s13037-024-00394-zThe impact of an anesthesia residency teaching service on anesthesia-controlled time and postsurgical patient outcomes: a retrospective observational study on 15,084 surgical casesDavene Lynch0Paul D. Mongan1Amie L. Hoefnagel2University of Florida College of MedicineUniversity of Florida College of MedicineUniversity of Florida College of MedicineAbstract Background Limited data exists regarding the impact of anesthesia residents on operating room efficiency and patient safety outcomes. This investigation hypothesized that supervised anesthesiology residents do not increase anesthesia-controlled or prolonged extubation times compared to supervised certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNA)/certified anesthesiologist assistants (CAA) or anesthesiologists working independently. Secondary objectives included differences in critical outcomes such as intraoperative hypotension, cardiac and pulmonary complications, acute kidney injury, and mortality. Methods This retrospective single-center 24-month (January 1, 2020- December 31, 2021) cohort focused on primary outcomes of anesthesia-controlled times and prolonged extubation (>15 min) with additional assessment of secondary patient outcomes in adult patients having general anesthesia with an endotracheal tube or laryngeal mask airway for elective non-cardiac surgery. The study excluded sedation, obstetric, endoscopic, ophthalmology, and non-operating room procedures. Procedures were divided into three groups: anesthesiologists working solo, anesthesiologists supervising residents, or anesthesiologists supervising CRNA/CAAs. After univariate analysis, multivariable models were constructed to control for the univariate cofactor differences in the primary and secondary outcomes. Results A total of 15,084 surgical cases met the inclusion criteria for this study for the three different care models: solo anesthesiologists (1,204 cases), anesthesiologist/resident pairing (3,146 cases), and anesthesiologist/CRNA/CAA (14,040 cases). Before multivariate analysis, the resident group exhibited longer anesthesia-controlled times (median, [interquartile range], 26.1 [21.7–32.0], p < 0.001), compared to CRNA/CAA (23.9 [19.7–29.5]), and attending-only surgical cases (21.0 [17.9–25.4]). After adjusting for covariates in a general linear regression model (age, BMI, ASA classification, comorbidities, arterial line insertion, surgical service, and surgical location), there were no significant differences in the anesthesia-controlled times between the provider groups. Prolonged extubation times (>15 min) were significantly less common in the anesthesiologist-only group compared to the other groups (p < 0.001). Despite these time differences, there were no clinically significant differences among the groups in postoperative pulmonary or cardiac complications, renal impairment, or the 30-day mortality rate of patients. Conclusion Anesthesia residents do not increase anesthesia-controlled operating room times or adversely affect clinically relevant patient outcomes compared to anesthesiologists working independently or supervising certified registered nurse anesthetists or certified anesthesiologist assistants.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-024-00394-z |
| spellingShingle | Davene Lynch Paul D. Mongan Amie L. Hoefnagel The impact of an anesthesia residency teaching service on anesthesia-controlled time and postsurgical patient outcomes: a retrospective observational study on 15,084 surgical cases Patient Safety in Surgery |
| title | The impact of an anesthesia residency teaching service on anesthesia-controlled time and postsurgical patient outcomes: a retrospective observational study on 15,084 surgical cases |
| title_full | The impact of an anesthesia residency teaching service on anesthesia-controlled time and postsurgical patient outcomes: a retrospective observational study on 15,084 surgical cases |
| title_fullStr | The impact of an anesthesia residency teaching service on anesthesia-controlled time and postsurgical patient outcomes: a retrospective observational study on 15,084 surgical cases |
| title_full_unstemmed | The impact of an anesthesia residency teaching service on anesthesia-controlled time and postsurgical patient outcomes: a retrospective observational study on 15,084 surgical cases |
| title_short | The impact of an anesthesia residency teaching service on anesthesia-controlled time and postsurgical patient outcomes: a retrospective observational study on 15,084 surgical cases |
| title_sort | impact of an anesthesia residency teaching service on anesthesia controlled time and postsurgical patient outcomes a retrospective observational study on 15 084 surgical cases |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-024-00394-z |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT davenelynch theimpactofananesthesiaresidencyteachingserviceonanesthesiacontrolledtimeandpostsurgicalpatientoutcomesaretrospectiveobservationalstudyon15084surgicalcases AT pauldmongan theimpactofananesthesiaresidencyteachingserviceonanesthesiacontrolledtimeandpostsurgicalpatientoutcomesaretrospectiveobservationalstudyon15084surgicalcases AT amielhoefnagel theimpactofananesthesiaresidencyteachingserviceonanesthesiacontrolledtimeandpostsurgicalpatientoutcomesaretrospectiveobservationalstudyon15084surgicalcases AT davenelynch impactofananesthesiaresidencyteachingserviceonanesthesiacontrolledtimeandpostsurgicalpatientoutcomesaretrospectiveobservationalstudyon15084surgicalcases AT pauldmongan impactofananesthesiaresidencyteachingserviceonanesthesiacontrolledtimeandpostsurgicalpatientoutcomesaretrospectiveobservationalstudyon15084surgicalcases AT amielhoefnagel impactofananesthesiaresidencyteachingserviceonanesthesiacontrolledtimeandpostsurgicalpatientoutcomesaretrospectiveobservationalstudyon15084surgicalcases |