PROTECTION ORDER VERSUS (?) PARENTAL AUTHORITY

Parental authority includes in its scope important decisions related to minors, as identified by Article 36 of Law no. 272/2004 (form of education and professional training, complex medical treatments and surgery, residence of the child or administration of property), which are by consequence to be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anca Magda VOICULESCU
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House 2021-05-01
Series:Challenges of the Knowledge Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://cks.univnt.ro/download/cks_2021_articles%252F2_private_law%252FCKS_2021_PRIVATE_LAW_029.pdf
_version_ 1818755344723083264
author Anca Magda VOICULESCU
author_facet Anca Magda VOICULESCU
author_sort Anca Magda VOICULESCU
collection DOAJ
description Parental authority includes in its scope important decisions related to minors, as identified by Article 36 of Law no. 272/2004 (form of education and professional training, complex medical treatments and surgery, residence of the child or administration of property), which are by consequence to be taken only by agreement of both parents. It is an institution which is genuinely based on collaboration of parents. Apparently a totally distinct institution, protection order is provided for by Law no. 217/2003 as a legal instrument to ensure the protection of victims against domestic violence. It is often used by one parent against the other, in the larger context of juridical disputes generated by divorce, and implies categorical opposition. Although the two legal institutions are distinguished and the premises on which they act are indeed different, case-law has revealed the existence of significant interferences, which exceed simple terminological differences and arise problematic issues both in substance, as in procedure. The purpose of this article is to examine these interconnections from a double perspective, both theoretical and practical, starting from a natural question: does the existence of a protection order interfere (and in the affirmative, to what extent) with the exercise of parental authority? Therefore, the objectives of this study are to examine relevant procedural and substantial matters as they derive from the experience so far and propose solutions, in an attempt to demonstrate that these two institutions may function together.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T05:37:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5d34083e017b42cba62418aba6f98c60
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2068-7796
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T05:37:40Z
publishDate 2021-05-01
publisher Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House
record_format Article
series Challenges of the Knowledge Society
spelling doaj.art-5d34083e017b42cba62418aba6f98c602022-12-21T21:19:15ZengNicolae Titulescu University Publishing HouseChallenges of the Knowledge Society2068-77962021-05-01141354360PROTECTION ORDER VERSUS (?) PARENTAL AUTHORITY Anca Magda VOICULESCU0PhD, Judge at Bucharest Tribunal, trainer in family law at Romanian National Institute of Magistracy, Romanian designated judge in International Network of Hague Judges for 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (e-mail: ancamagda.voiculescu@gmail.com)Parental authority includes in its scope important decisions related to minors, as identified by Article 36 of Law no. 272/2004 (form of education and professional training, complex medical treatments and surgery, residence of the child or administration of property), which are by consequence to be taken only by agreement of both parents. It is an institution which is genuinely based on collaboration of parents. Apparently a totally distinct institution, protection order is provided for by Law no. 217/2003 as a legal instrument to ensure the protection of victims against domestic violence. It is often used by one parent against the other, in the larger context of juridical disputes generated by divorce, and implies categorical opposition. Although the two legal institutions are distinguished and the premises on which they act are indeed different, case-law has revealed the existence of significant interferences, which exceed simple terminological differences and arise problematic issues both in substance, as in procedure. The purpose of this article is to examine these interconnections from a double perspective, both theoretical and practical, starting from a natural question: does the existence of a protection order interfere (and in the affirmative, to what extent) with the exercise of parental authority? Therefore, the objectives of this study are to examine relevant procedural and substantial matters as they derive from the experience so far and propose solutions, in an attempt to demonstrate that these two institutions may function together.http://cks.univnt.ro/download/cks_2021_articles%252F2_private_law%252FCKS_2021_PRIVATE_LAW_029.pdfprotection orderparental authorityimportant decisionsparental disagreementjuridical interferences
spellingShingle Anca Magda VOICULESCU
PROTECTION ORDER VERSUS (?) PARENTAL AUTHORITY
Challenges of the Knowledge Society
protection order
parental authority
important decisions
parental disagreement
juridical interferences
title PROTECTION ORDER VERSUS (?) PARENTAL AUTHORITY
title_full PROTECTION ORDER VERSUS (?) PARENTAL AUTHORITY
title_fullStr PROTECTION ORDER VERSUS (?) PARENTAL AUTHORITY
title_full_unstemmed PROTECTION ORDER VERSUS (?) PARENTAL AUTHORITY
title_short PROTECTION ORDER VERSUS (?) PARENTAL AUTHORITY
title_sort protection order versus parental authority
topic protection order
parental authority
important decisions
parental disagreement
juridical interferences
url http://cks.univnt.ro/download/cks_2021_articles%252F2_private_law%252FCKS_2021_PRIVATE_LAW_029.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ancamagdavoiculescu protectionorderversusparentalauthority