Comparing nitisinone 2 mg and 10 mg in the treatment of alkaptonuria—An approach using statistical modelling

Abstract Background Outcomes from studies employing nitisinone 10 mg and 2 mg in alkaptonuria were compared. Patients and methods Sixty‐nine patients in each of the nitisinone (10 mg daily) and controls of suitability of nitisinone in alkaptonuria 2 (SONIA 2), as well as 37 and 23 in nitisinone (2 m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lakshminarayan R. Ranganath, Anna M. Milan, Andrew T. Hughes, Milad Khedr, Brendan P. Norman, Mohammed Alsbou, Richard Imrich, Matthew Gornall, Nicolas Sireau, James A. Gallagher, Richard Jackson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:JIMD Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/jmd2.12261
_version_ 1818943394847653888
author Lakshminarayan R. Ranganath
Anna M. Milan
Andrew T. Hughes
Milad Khedr
Brendan P. Norman
Mohammed Alsbou
Richard Imrich
Matthew Gornall
Nicolas Sireau
James A. Gallagher
Richard Jackson
author_facet Lakshminarayan R. Ranganath
Anna M. Milan
Andrew T. Hughes
Milad Khedr
Brendan P. Norman
Mohammed Alsbou
Richard Imrich
Matthew Gornall
Nicolas Sireau
James A. Gallagher
Richard Jackson
author_sort Lakshminarayan R. Ranganath
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Outcomes from studies employing nitisinone 10 mg and 2 mg in alkaptonuria were compared. Patients and methods Sixty‐nine patients in each of the nitisinone (10 mg daily) and controls of suitability of nitisinone in alkaptonuria 2 (SONIA 2), as well as 37 and 23 in nitisinone (2 mg daily) and control cohorts at the National Alkaptonuria Centre (NAC), respectively, were followed up for 4 years. Severity of alkaptonuria (AKU) was assessed by the AKU Severity Score Index (AKUSSI). 24‐h urine homogentisic acid (uHGA24), serum HGA (sHGA), serum tyrosine (sTYR) and serum nitisinone (sNIT) were also analysed at each time point. Dietetic support was used in the NAC, but not in SONIA 2. Safety outcomes were also compared. All statistical analyses were post hoc. Results The slope of the AKUSSI was 0.55, 0.19, 0.30, and 0.06 per month in the control NAC, nitisinone NAC, control SONIA 2, and nitisinone SONIA 2 cohorts, respectively. The intersection of the slopes on the x‐axis was −132, −411, −295, and − 1460 months, respectively. The control and nitisinone slope comparisons were statistically significant both in the NAC (p < 0.001) and the SONIA 2 (p < 0.001). Corneal keratopathy occurred in 3 and 10 patients in the NAC and SONIA 2, respectively. Discussion The nitisinone 10 mg dose decreased disease progression more than the 2 mg dose although the incidence of corneal keratopathy was 14.5% and 4.9%, respectively. Conclusion Nitisinone 10 mg decreased urine and serum HGA, increased serum tyrosine, and decreased disease progression more than 2 mg. Low‐protein dietetic support may be needed to mitigate tyrosinaemia following nitisinone. Highlights Nitisinone 10 mg apparently slows alkaptonuria disease progression more than 2 mg in adults. Corneal keratopathy during nitisinone therapy was more common in men. Serum nitisinone concentrations increased significantly over time. Nitisinone may inhibit cytochrome P450 self catabolism.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T07:26:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5d36e4859dd84f01a498e92ebccc7fb8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2192-8312
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T07:26:38Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series JIMD Reports
spelling doaj.art-5d36e4859dd84f01a498e92ebccc7fb82022-12-21T19:48:32ZengWileyJIMD Reports2192-83122022-01-01631809210.1002/jmd2.12261Comparing nitisinone 2 mg and 10 mg in the treatment of alkaptonuria—An approach using statistical modellingLakshminarayan R. Ranganath0Anna M. Milan1Andrew T. Hughes2Milad Khedr3Brendan P. Norman4Mohammed Alsbou5Richard Imrich6Matthew Gornall7Nicolas Sireau8James A. Gallagher9Richard Jackson10Departments of Clinical Biochemistry and Metabolic Medicine Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trusts Liverpool UKDepartments of Clinical Biochemistry and Metabolic Medicine Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trusts Liverpool UKDepartments of Clinical Biochemistry and Metabolic Medicine Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trusts Liverpool UKDepartments of Clinical Biochemistry and Metabolic Medicine Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trusts Liverpool UKMusculoskeletal Biology and Ageing University of Liverpool, William Henry Duncan Building Liverpool UKFaculty of Medicine Mutah University Karak JordanNational Institute of Rheumatic Diseases Piešťany SlovakiaLiverpool Cancer Trials Unit University of Liverpool Liverpool UKAKU Society Cambridge UKMusculoskeletal Biology and Ageing University of Liverpool, William Henry Duncan Building Liverpool UKLiverpool Cancer Trials Unit University of Liverpool Liverpool UKAbstract Background Outcomes from studies employing nitisinone 10 mg and 2 mg in alkaptonuria were compared. Patients and methods Sixty‐nine patients in each of the nitisinone (10 mg daily) and controls of suitability of nitisinone in alkaptonuria 2 (SONIA 2), as well as 37 and 23 in nitisinone (2 mg daily) and control cohorts at the National Alkaptonuria Centre (NAC), respectively, were followed up for 4 years. Severity of alkaptonuria (AKU) was assessed by the AKU Severity Score Index (AKUSSI). 24‐h urine homogentisic acid (uHGA24), serum HGA (sHGA), serum tyrosine (sTYR) and serum nitisinone (sNIT) were also analysed at each time point. Dietetic support was used in the NAC, but not in SONIA 2. Safety outcomes were also compared. All statistical analyses were post hoc. Results The slope of the AKUSSI was 0.55, 0.19, 0.30, and 0.06 per month in the control NAC, nitisinone NAC, control SONIA 2, and nitisinone SONIA 2 cohorts, respectively. The intersection of the slopes on the x‐axis was −132, −411, −295, and − 1460 months, respectively. The control and nitisinone slope comparisons were statistically significant both in the NAC (p < 0.001) and the SONIA 2 (p < 0.001). Corneal keratopathy occurred in 3 and 10 patients in the NAC and SONIA 2, respectively. Discussion The nitisinone 10 mg dose decreased disease progression more than the 2 mg dose although the incidence of corneal keratopathy was 14.5% and 4.9%, respectively. Conclusion Nitisinone 10 mg decreased urine and serum HGA, increased serum tyrosine, and decreased disease progression more than 2 mg. Low‐protein dietetic support may be needed to mitigate tyrosinaemia following nitisinone. Highlights Nitisinone 10 mg apparently slows alkaptonuria disease progression more than 2 mg in adults. Corneal keratopathy during nitisinone therapy was more common in men. Serum nitisinone concentrations increased significantly over time. Nitisinone may inhibit cytochrome P450 self catabolism.https://doi.org/10.1002/jmd2.12261AKUSSIalkaptonuriadisease progressionhomogentisic acidnitisinonesafety
spellingShingle Lakshminarayan R. Ranganath
Anna M. Milan
Andrew T. Hughes
Milad Khedr
Brendan P. Norman
Mohammed Alsbou
Richard Imrich
Matthew Gornall
Nicolas Sireau
James A. Gallagher
Richard Jackson
Comparing nitisinone 2 mg and 10 mg in the treatment of alkaptonuria—An approach using statistical modelling
JIMD Reports
AKUSSI
alkaptonuria
disease progression
homogentisic acid
nitisinone
safety
title Comparing nitisinone 2 mg and 10 mg in the treatment of alkaptonuria—An approach using statistical modelling
title_full Comparing nitisinone 2 mg and 10 mg in the treatment of alkaptonuria—An approach using statistical modelling
title_fullStr Comparing nitisinone 2 mg and 10 mg in the treatment of alkaptonuria—An approach using statistical modelling
title_full_unstemmed Comparing nitisinone 2 mg and 10 mg in the treatment of alkaptonuria—An approach using statistical modelling
title_short Comparing nitisinone 2 mg and 10 mg in the treatment of alkaptonuria—An approach using statistical modelling
title_sort comparing nitisinone 2 mg and 10 mg in the treatment of alkaptonuria an approach using statistical modelling
topic AKUSSI
alkaptonuria
disease progression
homogentisic acid
nitisinone
safety
url https://doi.org/10.1002/jmd2.12261
work_keys_str_mv AT lakshminarayanrranganath comparingnitisinone2mgand10mginthetreatmentofalkaptonuriaanapproachusingstatisticalmodelling
AT annammilan comparingnitisinone2mgand10mginthetreatmentofalkaptonuriaanapproachusingstatisticalmodelling
AT andrewthughes comparingnitisinone2mgand10mginthetreatmentofalkaptonuriaanapproachusingstatisticalmodelling
AT miladkhedr comparingnitisinone2mgand10mginthetreatmentofalkaptonuriaanapproachusingstatisticalmodelling
AT brendanpnorman comparingnitisinone2mgand10mginthetreatmentofalkaptonuriaanapproachusingstatisticalmodelling
AT mohammedalsbou comparingnitisinone2mgand10mginthetreatmentofalkaptonuriaanapproachusingstatisticalmodelling
AT richardimrich comparingnitisinone2mgand10mginthetreatmentofalkaptonuriaanapproachusingstatisticalmodelling
AT matthewgornall comparingnitisinone2mgand10mginthetreatmentofalkaptonuriaanapproachusingstatisticalmodelling
AT nicolassireau comparingnitisinone2mgand10mginthetreatmentofalkaptonuriaanapproachusingstatisticalmodelling
AT jamesagallagher comparingnitisinone2mgand10mginthetreatmentofalkaptonuriaanapproachusingstatisticalmodelling
AT richardjackson comparingnitisinone2mgand10mginthetreatmentofalkaptonuriaanapproachusingstatisticalmodelling