Intersecting disciplinary frameworks: the architecture and ecology of the city

Introduction: While many studies have explored the link between ecology and urban design, this paper examines two major conceptions that can promote deeper connections between architecture and ecological science. Outcomes: Rather than providing a comprehensive review, the paper explores in detail tw...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Brian McGrath
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) 2018-06-01
Series:Ecosystem Health and Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1482730
_version_ 1797725202789957632
author Brian McGrath
author_facet Brian McGrath
author_sort Brian McGrath
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: While many studies have explored the link between ecology and urban design, this paper examines two major conceptions that can promote deeper connections between architecture and ecological science. Outcomes: Rather than providing a comprehensive review, the paper explores in detail two frameworks that have not yet been exploited as foundations for a bridge between these fields. One is the seminal work of Aldo Rossi on the architecture of the city, as opposed to a more traditional architectural focus on specific buildings, lots, or specific clients. The complementary framework for ecological science is the ecology of the city, developed to support and explain a new era of more integrated social-ecological study of urban systems than had existed previously. Discussion: This paper draws heretofore unexamined parallels between architecture as represented by the work of Rossi and the ecology of the city as represented by the Baltimore School of Urban Ecology. The ecology of the city has become a widely used framing in the science of urban ecology, while the architecture of the city continues to influence a deeper understanding of the built environment as a whole. The parallels provided by the architecture of the city and the ecology of the city help to understand the historical interrelations between nature and culture. Conclusion: Intersecting the two conceptual frameworks of the architecture and ecology of the city can help satisfy the call for an actionable ecology for the  city. This call demands both disciplines integrate their conceptual frameworks with communities in the collective enterprise of creating urban ecosystem health, justice, and sustainability.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T10:27:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5d5ae53f61d743ef8d0e35a491ee70ec
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2096-4129
2332-8878
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T10:27:46Z
publishDate 2018-06-01
publisher American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
record_format Article
series Ecosystem Health and Sustainability
spelling doaj.art-5d5ae53f61d743ef8d0e35a491ee70ec2023-09-02T09:32:54ZengAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)Ecosystem Health and Sustainability2096-41292332-88782018-06-014614815910.1080/20964129.2018.14827301482730Intersecting disciplinary frameworks: the architecture and ecology of the cityBrian McGrath0Parsons School of Design, The New SchoolIntroduction: While many studies have explored the link between ecology and urban design, this paper examines two major conceptions that can promote deeper connections between architecture and ecological science. Outcomes: Rather than providing a comprehensive review, the paper explores in detail two frameworks that have not yet been exploited as foundations for a bridge between these fields. One is the seminal work of Aldo Rossi on the architecture of the city, as opposed to a more traditional architectural focus on specific buildings, lots, or specific clients. The complementary framework for ecological science is the ecology of the city, developed to support and explain a new era of more integrated social-ecological study of urban systems than had existed previously. Discussion: This paper draws heretofore unexamined parallels between architecture as represented by the work of Rossi and the ecology of the city as represented by the Baltimore School of Urban Ecology. The ecology of the city has become a widely used framing in the science of urban ecology, while the architecture of the city continues to influence a deeper understanding of the built environment as a whole. The parallels provided by the architecture of the city and the ecology of the city help to understand the historical interrelations between nature and culture. Conclusion: Intersecting the two conceptual frameworks of the architecture and ecology of the city can help satisfy the call for an actionable ecology for the  city. This call demands both disciplines integrate their conceptual frameworks with communities in the collective enterprise of creating urban ecosystem health, justice, and sustainability.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1482730Architectureecologyurban designurban artifactspatch dynamics
spellingShingle Brian McGrath
Intersecting disciplinary frameworks: the architecture and ecology of the city
Ecosystem Health and Sustainability
Architecture
ecology
urban design
urban artifacts
patch dynamics
title Intersecting disciplinary frameworks: the architecture and ecology of the city
title_full Intersecting disciplinary frameworks: the architecture and ecology of the city
title_fullStr Intersecting disciplinary frameworks: the architecture and ecology of the city
title_full_unstemmed Intersecting disciplinary frameworks: the architecture and ecology of the city
title_short Intersecting disciplinary frameworks: the architecture and ecology of the city
title_sort intersecting disciplinary frameworks the architecture and ecology of the city
topic Architecture
ecology
urban design
urban artifacts
patch dynamics
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1482730
work_keys_str_mv AT brianmcgrath intersectingdisciplinaryframeworksthearchitectureandecologyofthecity