Switchgrass Forage Yield and Compositional Response to Phosphorus and Potassium

Core Ideas Recommended P and K rates are largely unknown for native grasslands. Switchgrass requires low levels of P and K in a two‐cut forage system. There are limited forage quality gains from P and K fertilizers. Nitrogen is a more limiting nutrient in switchgrass forage systems on marginal soils...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. J. Ashworth, P. A. Moore Jr, R. King, D. H. Pote, J. L. Douglas, A. A. Jacobs, E. Pratt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-01-01
Series:Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2134/age2019.02.0010
_version_ 1811235352921243648
author A. J. Ashworth
P. A. Moore Jr
R. King
D. H. Pote
J. L. Douglas
A. A. Jacobs
E. Pratt
author_facet A. J. Ashworth
P. A. Moore Jr
R. King
D. H. Pote
J. L. Douglas
A. A. Jacobs
E. Pratt
author_sort A. J. Ashworth
collection DOAJ
description Core Ideas Recommended P and K rates are largely unknown for native grasslands. Switchgrass requires low levels of P and K in a two‐cut forage system. There are limited forage quality gains from P and K fertilizers. Nitrogen is a more limiting nutrient in switchgrass forage systems on marginal soils. Finite nutrients, including P and K, are required in large quantities for many warm‐season forages. However, native perennial grasses such as switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) have less of an affinity for fertilizers, although recommended P and K rates are largely unknown. Objectives were to test switchgrass forage yield response to P and K rates representative of warm‐season forages and identify compositional impacts for developing switchgrass forage fertilizer recommendations. Switchgrass cv. Alamo was subjected to two harvests per year after applications of 0, 28, 56, 112, and 224 kg P ha−1, and split applications of 0, 134, 269, 404, and 538 kg K ha−1 yr−1, from 2014 to 2016. Two sets of controls were used, a “nutrient control” (0 P and K with supplemental rates of N and S) and a “control” (no fertilizer). Harvest timing (first or second cuts) did not influence (P ≥ 0.05) P or K removal or forage yields. For all study years, the control (no supplemental fertilizer) resulted in substantially lower (P ≤ 0.05) yields than the nutrient control, meaning yield did benefit (44 and 49% increases) from supplemental nutrient applications. Therefore, minimal P and K inputs are required for a yield response, as there were very few detectable yield increases beyond the lowest tested application rates (134 kg K ha−1 and 28 kg P ha−1). Results indicate P and K are required in low amounts and that N is a more limiting nutrient in switchgrass forage systems on marginal soils of the southeast.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T11:50:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5d629e815d4245fea058c88f3a1ae5cb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2639-6696
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T11:50:33Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
spelling doaj.art-5d629e815d4245fea058c88f3a1ae5cb2022-12-22T03:34:12ZengWileyAgrosystems, Geosciences & Environment2639-66962019-01-01211810.2134/age2019.02.0010Switchgrass Forage Yield and Compositional Response to Phosphorus and PotassiumA. J. Ashworth0P. A. Moore Jr1R. King2D. H. Pote3J. L. Douglas4A. A. Jacobs5E. Pratt6USDA‐ARSPoultry Production and Product Safety Research Unit1260 W. MapleSt. FayettevilleAR72701USDA‐ARSPoultry Production and Product Safety Research Unit1260 W. MapleSt. FayettevilleAR72701USDA‐Natural Resources Conservation ServicePlant Materials Center6883 S. State Highway 23BoonevilleAR72927USDA‐ARSDale Bumpers Small Farms Research Center6883 S. State Highway 23BoonevilleAR72927USDA‐Natural Resources Conservation ServicePlant Materials Center501 West Felix St. Bldg. 23Fort WorthTX76115USDA‐Natural Resources Conservation ServicePlant Materials Center2533 County Road 65CoffeevilleMS38922USDA‐Natural Resources Conservation ServicePlant Materials Center6883 S. State Highway 23BoonevilleAR72927Core Ideas Recommended P and K rates are largely unknown for native grasslands. Switchgrass requires low levels of P and K in a two‐cut forage system. There are limited forage quality gains from P and K fertilizers. Nitrogen is a more limiting nutrient in switchgrass forage systems on marginal soils. Finite nutrients, including P and K, are required in large quantities for many warm‐season forages. However, native perennial grasses such as switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) have less of an affinity for fertilizers, although recommended P and K rates are largely unknown. Objectives were to test switchgrass forage yield response to P and K rates representative of warm‐season forages and identify compositional impacts for developing switchgrass forage fertilizer recommendations. Switchgrass cv. Alamo was subjected to two harvests per year after applications of 0, 28, 56, 112, and 224 kg P ha−1, and split applications of 0, 134, 269, 404, and 538 kg K ha−1 yr−1, from 2014 to 2016. Two sets of controls were used, a “nutrient control” (0 P and K with supplemental rates of N and S) and a “control” (no fertilizer). Harvest timing (first or second cuts) did not influence (P ≥ 0.05) P or K removal or forage yields. For all study years, the control (no supplemental fertilizer) resulted in substantially lower (P ≤ 0.05) yields than the nutrient control, meaning yield did benefit (44 and 49% increases) from supplemental nutrient applications. Therefore, minimal P and K inputs are required for a yield response, as there were very few detectable yield increases beyond the lowest tested application rates (134 kg K ha−1 and 28 kg P ha−1). Results indicate P and K are required in low amounts and that N is a more limiting nutrient in switchgrass forage systems on marginal soils of the southeast.https://doi.org/10.2134/age2019.02.0010
spellingShingle A. J. Ashworth
P. A. Moore Jr
R. King
D. H. Pote
J. L. Douglas
A. A. Jacobs
E. Pratt
Switchgrass Forage Yield and Compositional Response to Phosphorus and Potassium
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
title Switchgrass Forage Yield and Compositional Response to Phosphorus and Potassium
title_full Switchgrass Forage Yield and Compositional Response to Phosphorus and Potassium
title_fullStr Switchgrass Forage Yield and Compositional Response to Phosphorus and Potassium
title_full_unstemmed Switchgrass Forage Yield and Compositional Response to Phosphorus and Potassium
title_short Switchgrass Forage Yield and Compositional Response to Phosphorus and Potassium
title_sort switchgrass forage yield and compositional response to phosphorus and potassium
url https://doi.org/10.2134/age2019.02.0010
work_keys_str_mv AT ajashworth switchgrassforageyieldandcompositionalresponsetophosphorusandpotassium
AT pamoorejr switchgrassforageyieldandcompositionalresponsetophosphorusandpotassium
AT rking switchgrassforageyieldandcompositionalresponsetophosphorusandpotassium
AT dhpote switchgrassforageyieldandcompositionalresponsetophosphorusandpotassium
AT jldouglas switchgrassforageyieldandcompositionalresponsetophosphorusandpotassium
AT aajacobs switchgrassforageyieldandcompositionalresponsetophosphorusandpotassium
AT epratt switchgrassforageyieldandcompositionalresponsetophosphorusandpotassium