Comparing the Efficacy of Carboplatin plus 5-Fluorouracil, Cisplatin plus 5-Fluorouracil, and Best Supportive Care for Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Analysis from a Tertiary Hospital in Southern Thailand

<b>Background</b>: Although cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is the standard first-line treatment for advanced-stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), carboplatin was substituted for cisplatin in cisplatin-ineligible patients. The efficacy of carboplatin plus 5-FU for advanc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jirapat Wonglhow, Panu Wetwittayakhlang, Patrapim Sunpaweravong, Chirawadee Sathitruangsak, Arunee Dechaphunkul
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-03-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/13/6/1735
_version_ 1797240544243482624
author Jirapat Wonglhow
Panu Wetwittayakhlang
Patrapim Sunpaweravong
Chirawadee Sathitruangsak
Arunee Dechaphunkul
author_facet Jirapat Wonglhow
Panu Wetwittayakhlang
Patrapim Sunpaweravong
Chirawadee Sathitruangsak
Arunee Dechaphunkul
author_sort Jirapat Wonglhow
collection DOAJ
description <b>Background</b>: Although cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is the standard first-line treatment for advanced-stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), carboplatin was substituted for cisplatin in cisplatin-ineligible patients. The efficacy of carboplatin plus 5-FU for advanced-stage ESCC remains unreported. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective study analyzed first-line treatment—carboplatin plus 5-FU, cisplatin plus 5-FU, or best supportive care (BSC)—in advanced-stage ESCC patients at a tertiary hospital in Thailand (2012–2022). Survival was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method, compared via the log-rank test, and adjusted through propensity score matching. Significance was set at <i>p</i> < 0.05. <b>Results</b>: Of 256 patients, 39.9% received carboplatin plus 5-FU, 27.7% cisplatin plus 5-FU, and 32.4% BSC. Carboplatin was significantly associated with older age, poorer performance status, more comorbidities, chronic kidney disease, and lower creatinine clearance. Median overall survival (OS) for carboplatin plus 5-FU, cisplatin plus 5-FU, and BSC was 8.05 (HR 0.31 [0.23, 0.43] vs. BSC, <i>p</i> < 0.001; HR 1.06 [0.78, 1.44] vs. cisplatin plus 5-FU, <i>p</i> = 0.7), 8.43, and 3.64 months, respectively. No significant OS difference was observed between carboplatin and cisplatin treatments after propensity score matching. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rates (ORR) showed no significant difference between carboplatin and cisplatin treatments. <b>Conclusions</b>: Despite less favorable baseline characteristics of patients receiving carboplatin plus 5-FU, this combination exhibited comparable OS, PFS, and ORR to cisplatin plus 5-FU in real-world scenarios. Furthermore, it significantly improved OS over BSC. Consequently, carboplatin plus 5-FU should be considered as an alternative regimen, particularly for advanced-stage ESCC patients who are ineligible for cisplatin.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T18:09:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5d641bf6a8674d45894f0061d47330c0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T18:09:07Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-5d641bf6a8674d45894f0061d47330c02024-03-27T13:48:10ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832024-03-01136173510.3390/jcm13061735Comparing the Efficacy of Carboplatin plus 5-Fluorouracil, Cisplatin plus 5-Fluorouracil, and Best Supportive Care for Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Analysis from a Tertiary Hospital in Southern ThailandJirapat Wonglhow0Panu Wetwittayakhlang1Patrapim Sunpaweravong2Chirawadee Sathitruangsak3Arunee Dechaphunkul4Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, ThailandDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, ThailandDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, ThailandDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, ThailandDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand<b>Background</b>: Although cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is the standard first-line treatment for advanced-stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), carboplatin was substituted for cisplatin in cisplatin-ineligible patients. The efficacy of carboplatin plus 5-FU for advanced-stage ESCC remains unreported. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective study analyzed first-line treatment—carboplatin plus 5-FU, cisplatin plus 5-FU, or best supportive care (BSC)—in advanced-stage ESCC patients at a tertiary hospital in Thailand (2012–2022). Survival was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method, compared via the log-rank test, and adjusted through propensity score matching. Significance was set at <i>p</i> < 0.05. <b>Results</b>: Of 256 patients, 39.9% received carboplatin plus 5-FU, 27.7% cisplatin plus 5-FU, and 32.4% BSC. Carboplatin was significantly associated with older age, poorer performance status, more comorbidities, chronic kidney disease, and lower creatinine clearance. Median overall survival (OS) for carboplatin plus 5-FU, cisplatin plus 5-FU, and BSC was 8.05 (HR 0.31 [0.23, 0.43] vs. BSC, <i>p</i> < 0.001; HR 1.06 [0.78, 1.44] vs. cisplatin plus 5-FU, <i>p</i> = 0.7), 8.43, and 3.64 months, respectively. No significant OS difference was observed between carboplatin and cisplatin treatments after propensity score matching. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rates (ORR) showed no significant difference between carboplatin and cisplatin treatments. <b>Conclusions</b>: Despite less favorable baseline characteristics of patients receiving carboplatin plus 5-FU, this combination exhibited comparable OS, PFS, and ORR to cisplatin plus 5-FU in real-world scenarios. Furthermore, it significantly improved OS over BSC. Consequently, carboplatin plus 5-FU should be considered as an alternative regimen, particularly for advanced-stage ESCC patients who are ineligible for cisplatin.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/13/6/1735esophageal cancersquamous cell carcinomaadvanced stagechemotherapycarboplatin5-fluorouracil
spellingShingle Jirapat Wonglhow
Panu Wetwittayakhlang
Patrapim Sunpaweravong
Chirawadee Sathitruangsak
Arunee Dechaphunkul
Comparing the Efficacy of Carboplatin plus 5-Fluorouracil, Cisplatin plus 5-Fluorouracil, and Best Supportive Care for Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Analysis from a Tertiary Hospital in Southern Thailand
Journal of Clinical Medicine
esophageal cancer
squamous cell carcinoma
advanced stage
chemotherapy
carboplatin
5-fluorouracil
title Comparing the Efficacy of Carboplatin plus 5-Fluorouracil, Cisplatin plus 5-Fluorouracil, and Best Supportive Care for Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Analysis from a Tertiary Hospital in Southern Thailand
title_full Comparing the Efficacy of Carboplatin plus 5-Fluorouracil, Cisplatin plus 5-Fluorouracil, and Best Supportive Care for Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Analysis from a Tertiary Hospital in Southern Thailand
title_fullStr Comparing the Efficacy of Carboplatin plus 5-Fluorouracil, Cisplatin plus 5-Fluorouracil, and Best Supportive Care for Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Analysis from a Tertiary Hospital in Southern Thailand
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Efficacy of Carboplatin plus 5-Fluorouracil, Cisplatin plus 5-Fluorouracil, and Best Supportive Care for Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Analysis from a Tertiary Hospital in Southern Thailand
title_short Comparing the Efficacy of Carboplatin plus 5-Fluorouracil, Cisplatin plus 5-Fluorouracil, and Best Supportive Care for Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Analysis from a Tertiary Hospital in Southern Thailand
title_sort comparing the efficacy of carboplatin plus 5 fluorouracil cisplatin plus 5 fluorouracil and best supportive care for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma a propensity score analysis from a tertiary hospital in southern thailand
topic esophageal cancer
squamous cell carcinoma
advanced stage
chemotherapy
carboplatin
5-fluorouracil
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/13/6/1735
work_keys_str_mv AT jirapatwonglhow comparingtheefficacyofcarboplatinplus5fluorouracilcisplatinplus5fluorouracilandbestsupportivecareforadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaapropensityscoreanalysisfromatertiaryhospitalinsouthernthailand
AT panuwetwittayakhlang comparingtheefficacyofcarboplatinplus5fluorouracilcisplatinplus5fluorouracilandbestsupportivecareforadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaapropensityscoreanalysisfromatertiaryhospitalinsouthernthailand
AT patrapimsunpaweravong comparingtheefficacyofcarboplatinplus5fluorouracilcisplatinplus5fluorouracilandbestsupportivecareforadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaapropensityscoreanalysisfromatertiaryhospitalinsouthernthailand
AT chirawadeesathitruangsak comparingtheefficacyofcarboplatinplus5fluorouracilcisplatinplus5fluorouracilandbestsupportivecareforadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaapropensityscoreanalysisfromatertiaryhospitalinsouthernthailand
AT aruneedechaphunkul comparingtheefficacyofcarboplatinplus5fluorouracilcisplatinplus5fluorouracilandbestsupportivecareforadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaapropensityscoreanalysisfromatertiaryhospitalinsouthernthailand