JUSTIFICATION OF ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF ARCTIC LNG TRANSPORTATION BY SEA

Russian Arctic is the largest exporter of domestic natural gas, which brings significant income to the federal budget. The major share of natural gas extracted in the Arctic is transported via pipelines in the direction of European countries. For a number of reasons EU is continuously reducing its c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Yu. Koz'menko, V. A. Masloboev, D. A. Matviishin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Saint-Petersburg Mining University 2018-10-01
Series:Записки Горного института
Online Access:https://pmi.spmi.ru/index.php/pmi/article/view/13074?setLocale=en_US
_version_ 1828058137704267776
author S. Yu. Koz'menko
V. A. Masloboev
D. A. Matviishin
author_facet S. Yu. Koz'menko
V. A. Masloboev
D. A. Matviishin
author_sort S. Yu. Koz'menko
collection DOAJ
description Russian Arctic is the largest exporter of domestic natural gas, which brings significant income to the federal budget. The major share of natural gas extracted in the Arctic is transported via pipelines in the direction of European countries. For a number of reasons EU is continuously reducing its consumption of Russian natural gas, among other things by increasing the import of liquefied natural gas (LNG). All this is happening against the background of global markets refocusing from pipeline gas to LNG. An obvious solution here would be to increase LNG production in the Russian Arctic with its subsequent transportation by sea. Taking into account remote location of Arctic gas fields from the main sales markets, there is a need for comparative cost analysis of transportation via pipelines and LNG tankers.     The authors developed a method of assessing the costs of pipeline and sea transportation under comparable conditions. Calculations have been made for gas transportation to Germany, Italy, Turkey and China. As a result, it has been demonstrated that sea transportation of 1,000 m3 of natural gas is cheaper than pipeline transportation by the average value of 106.3 USD (–40.2 %) across all the routes in question. Performed calculations prove the economic benefits of sea transportation of Arctic LNG to the existing and potential markets for natural gas. Such results are justified by the need of rational replacement of pipeline gas by LNG in European markets (especially in Southern Europe, where LNG has a greater competitive advantage) and increasing export of liquefied natural gas to the Asia-Pacific Region. Suggested measures will allow to reduce the costs of sea LNG transportation, which will give Arctic natural gas a competitive edge on the global and regional gas markets.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T21:23:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5d64a041c1424ccfb75895215c6bf349
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2411-3336
2541-9404
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T21:23:53Z
publishDate 2018-10-01
publisher Saint-Petersburg Mining University
record_format Article
series Записки Горного института
spelling doaj.art-5d64a041c1424ccfb75895215c6bf3492023-01-20T02:04:55ZengSaint-Petersburg Mining UniversityЗаписки Горного института2411-33362541-94042018-10-0123355455410.31897/pmi.2018.5.55413074JUSTIFICATION OF ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF ARCTIC LNG TRANSPORTATION BY SEAS. Yu. Koz'menko0V. A. Masloboev1D. A. Matviishin2Murmansk State Technical UniversityFederal Research Center «Kola Science Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences»Murmansk State Technical UniversityRussian Arctic is the largest exporter of domestic natural gas, which brings significant income to the federal budget. The major share of natural gas extracted in the Arctic is transported via pipelines in the direction of European countries. For a number of reasons EU is continuously reducing its consumption of Russian natural gas, among other things by increasing the import of liquefied natural gas (LNG). All this is happening against the background of global markets refocusing from pipeline gas to LNG. An obvious solution here would be to increase LNG production in the Russian Arctic with its subsequent transportation by sea. Taking into account remote location of Arctic gas fields from the main sales markets, there is a need for comparative cost analysis of transportation via pipelines and LNG tankers.     The authors developed a method of assessing the costs of pipeline and sea transportation under comparable conditions. Calculations have been made for gas transportation to Germany, Italy, Turkey and China. As a result, it has been demonstrated that sea transportation of 1,000 m3 of natural gas is cheaper than pipeline transportation by the average value of 106.3 USD (–40.2 %) across all the routes in question. Performed calculations prove the economic benefits of sea transportation of Arctic LNG to the existing and potential markets for natural gas. Such results are justified by the need of rational replacement of pipeline gas by LNG in European markets (especially in Southern Europe, where LNG has a greater competitive advantage) and increasing export of liquefied natural gas to the Asia-Pacific Region. Suggested measures will allow to reduce the costs of sea LNG transportation, which will give Arctic natural gas a competitive edge on the global and regional gas markets.https://pmi.spmi.ru/index.php/pmi/article/view/13074?setLocale=en_US
spellingShingle S. Yu. Koz'menko
V. A. Masloboev
D. A. Matviishin
JUSTIFICATION OF ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF ARCTIC LNG TRANSPORTATION BY SEA
Записки Горного института
title JUSTIFICATION OF ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF ARCTIC LNG TRANSPORTATION BY SEA
title_full JUSTIFICATION OF ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF ARCTIC LNG TRANSPORTATION BY SEA
title_fullStr JUSTIFICATION OF ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF ARCTIC LNG TRANSPORTATION BY SEA
title_full_unstemmed JUSTIFICATION OF ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF ARCTIC LNG TRANSPORTATION BY SEA
title_short JUSTIFICATION OF ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF ARCTIC LNG TRANSPORTATION BY SEA
title_sort justification of economic benefits of arctic lng transportation by sea
url https://pmi.spmi.ru/index.php/pmi/article/view/13074?setLocale=en_US
work_keys_str_mv AT syukozmenko justificationofeconomicbenefitsofarcticlngtransportationbysea
AT vamasloboev justificationofeconomicbenefitsofarcticlngtransportationbysea
AT damatviishin justificationofeconomicbenefitsofarcticlngtransportationbysea