Why do plants respond differently to hydropeaking disturbance? A functional approach

Hydropeaking, which refers to large and rapid flow fluctuations caused by the turning on or off of hydro-turbines to generate electricity, is a topic of growing interest due to its impact on fluvial ecosystems. To date, most hydropeaking studies have focused on the impact of this hydropower operatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alejandro Baladrón, María Dolores Bejarano, Isabel Boavida
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-06-01
Series:Ecological Indicators
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X23003795
_version_ 1797837774510882816
author Alejandro Baladrón
María Dolores Bejarano
Isabel Boavida
author_facet Alejandro Baladrón
María Dolores Bejarano
Isabel Boavida
author_sort Alejandro Baladrón
collection DOAJ
description Hydropeaking, which refers to large and rapid flow fluctuations caused by the turning on or off of hydro-turbines to generate electricity, is a topic of growing interest due to its impact on fluvial ecosystems. To date, most hydropeaking studies have focused on the impact of this hydropower operation mode on invertebrate and fish communities, but little attention has been paid to its impact on riverine communities and how functional traits may make plants resistant to hydropeaking. We determined how a set of 32 plant functional traits are expressed in 14 riverine species, and how such expression affects their capacity to cope with common sources of hydropeaking disturbance (i.e., inundation, water stress, and rapid water fluctuations linked to up-ramping and down-ramping hydropeaking operations). We categorized species as “resistant”, “partially-resistant” or “vulnerable” based on the capacity of each trait to confer resistance to hydropeaking disturbances. Two indexes (i.e., “hydropeaking plant species resistance index” (HPPR) and “hydropeaking plant community resistance” index (HPCR)) were developed to rank our species based on their tolerance to hydropeaking and to determine which were the commonest “hydropeaking-resistant” traits within the plant community. Our results evidenced that coincidences in trait expression are common between species with similar growth forms. Grasses were the most resistant to inundation and water fluctuations, whereas trees and shrubs were so to water stress. In general, forbs were rather vulnerable to all the hydropeaking disturbances. The differences observed between the resistance expected and the obtained for several plant species illustrate the importance of our approach to fine-tune the diagnostics on plant species vulnerability to hydropeaking.. We believe this initiative will help river managers to detect suitable species to restore rivers affected by hydropower production.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T15:31:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5d674ebce0774aa391d0e44e3a929733
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1470-160X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T15:31:09Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Ecological Indicators
spelling doaj.art-5d674ebce0774aa391d0e44e3a9297332023-04-28T08:54:33ZengElsevierEcological Indicators1470-160X2023-06-01150110237Why do plants respond differently to hydropeaking disturbance? A functional approachAlejandro Baladrón0María Dolores Bejarano1Isabel Boavida2CERIS, Civil Engineering Research and Innovation for Sustainability, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, PortugalNatural Resources Department, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Calle José Antonio Novais, 10, 28040 Madrid, Spain; Corresponding author.CERIS, Civil Engineering Research and Innovation for Sustainability, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, PortugalHydropeaking, which refers to large and rapid flow fluctuations caused by the turning on or off of hydro-turbines to generate electricity, is a topic of growing interest due to its impact on fluvial ecosystems. To date, most hydropeaking studies have focused on the impact of this hydropower operation mode on invertebrate and fish communities, but little attention has been paid to its impact on riverine communities and how functional traits may make plants resistant to hydropeaking. We determined how a set of 32 plant functional traits are expressed in 14 riverine species, and how such expression affects their capacity to cope with common sources of hydropeaking disturbance (i.e., inundation, water stress, and rapid water fluctuations linked to up-ramping and down-ramping hydropeaking operations). We categorized species as “resistant”, “partially-resistant” or “vulnerable” based on the capacity of each trait to confer resistance to hydropeaking disturbances. Two indexes (i.e., “hydropeaking plant species resistance index” (HPPR) and “hydropeaking plant community resistance” index (HPCR)) were developed to rank our species based on their tolerance to hydropeaking and to determine which were the commonest “hydropeaking-resistant” traits within the plant community. Our results evidenced that coincidences in trait expression are common between species with similar growth forms. Grasses were the most resistant to inundation and water fluctuations, whereas trees and shrubs were so to water stress. In general, forbs were rather vulnerable to all the hydropeaking disturbances. The differences observed between the resistance expected and the obtained for several plant species illustrate the importance of our approach to fine-tune the diagnostics on plant species vulnerability to hydropeaking.. We believe this initiative will help river managers to detect suitable species to restore rivers affected by hydropower production.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X23003795FloodingHydropeakingPlant traitsRiverine vegetationWater stressWaterlogging
spellingShingle Alejandro Baladrón
María Dolores Bejarano
Isabel Boavida
Why do plants respond differently to hydropeaking disturbance? A functional approach
Ecological Indicators
Flooding
Hydropeaking
Plant traits
Riverine vegetation
Water stress
Waterlogging
title Why do plants respond differently to hydropeaking disturbance? A functional approach
title_full Why do plants respond differently to hydropeaking disturbance? A functional approach
title_fullStr Why do plants respond differently to hydropeaking disturbance? A functional approach
title_full_unstemmed Why do plants respond differently to hydropeaking disturbance? A functional approach
title_short Why do plants respond differently to hydropeaking disturbance? A functional approach
title_sort why do plants respond differently to hydropeaking disturbance a functional approach
topic Flooding
Hydropeaking
Plant traits
Riverine vegetation
Water stress
Waterlogging
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X23003795
work_keys_str_mv AT alejandrobaladron whydoplantsresponddifferentlytohydropeakingdisturbanceafunctionalapproach
AT mariadoloresbejarano whydoplantsresponddifferentlytohydropeakingdisturbanceafunctionalapproach
AT isabelboavida whydoplantsresponddifferentlytohydropeakingdisturbanceafunctionalapproach