Inhibition of selenoprotein synthesis is not the mechanism by which auranofin inhibits growth of Clostridioides difficile

Abstract Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) are responsible for a significant number of antibiotic-associated diarrheal cases. The standard-of-care antibiotics for C. difficile are limited to fidaxomicin and vancomycin, with the recently obsolete metronidazole recommended if both are unavail...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael A. Johnstone, Matthew A. Holman, William T. Self
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-09-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36796-9
_version_ 1797453274492698624
author Michael A. Johnstone
Matthew A. Holman
William T. Self
author_facet Michael A. Johnstone
Matthew A. Holman
William T. Self
author_sort Michael A. Johnstone
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) are responsible for a significant number of antibiotic-associated diarrheal cases. The standard-of-care antibiotics for C. difficile are limited to fidaxomicin and vancomycin, with the recently obsolete metronidazole recommended if both are unavailable. No new antimicrobials have been approved for CDI since fidaxomicin in 2011, despite varying rates of treatment failure among all standard-of-care drugs. Drug repurposing is a rational strategy to generate new antimicrobials out of existing therapeutics approved for other indications. Auranofin is a gold-containing anti-rheumatic drug with antimicrobial activity against C. difficile and other microbes. In a previous report, our group hypothesized that inhibition of selenoprotein biosynthesis was auranofin’s primary mechanism of action against C. difficile. However, in this study, we discovered that C. difficile mutants lacking selenoproteins are still just as sensitive to auranofin as their respective wild-type strains. Moreover, we found that selenite supplementation dampens the activity of auranofin against C. difficile regardless of the presence of selenoproteins, suggesting that selenite’s neutralization of auranofin is not because of compensation for a chemically induced selenium deficiency. Our results clarify the findings of our original study and may aid drug repurposing efforts in discovering the compound’s true mechanism of action against C. difficile.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T15:20:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5d6b531a09164dec839cfb12f82e616b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T15:20:28Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-5d6b531a09164dec839cfb12f82e616b2023-11-26T12:49:05ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222023-09-011311810.1038/s41598-023-36796-9Inhibition of selenoprotein synthesis is not the mechanism by which auranofin inhibits growth of Clostridioides difficileMichael A. Johnstone0Matthew A. Holman1William T. Self2Burnett School of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Central FloridaBurnett School of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Central FloridaBurnett School of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Central FloridaAbstract Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) are responsible for a significant number of antibiotic-associated diarrheal cases. The standard-of-care antibiotics for C. difficile are limited to fidaxomicin and vancomycin, with the recently obsolete metronidazole recommended if both are unavailable. No new antimicrobials have been approved for CDI since fidaxomicin in 2011, despite varying rates of treatment failure among all standard-of-care drugs. Drug repurposing is a rational strategy to generate new antimicrobials out of existing therapeutics approved for other indications. Auranofin is a gold-containing anti-rheumatic drug with antimicrobial activity against C. difficile and other microbes. In a previous report, our group hypothesized that inhibition of selenoprotein biosynthesis was auranofin’s primary mechanism of action against C. difficile. However, in this study, we discovered that C. difficile mutants lacking selenoproteins are still just as sensitive to auranofin as their respective wild-type strains. Moreover, we found that selenite supplementation dampens the activity of auranofin against C. difficile regardless of the presence of selenoproteins, suggesting that selenite’s neutralization of auranofin is not because of compensation for a chemically induced selenium deficiency. Our results clarify the findings of our original study and may aid drug repurposing efforts in discovering the compound’s true mechanism of action against C. difficile.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36796-9
spellingShingle Michael A. Johnstone
Matthew A. Holman
William T. Self
Inhibition of selenoprotein synthesis is not the mechanism by which auranofin inhibits growth of Clostridioides difficile
Scientific Reports
title Inhibition of selenoprotein synthesis is not the mechanism by which auranofin inhibits growth of Clostridioides difficile
title_full Inhibition of selenoprotein synthesis is not the mechanism by which auranofin inhibits growth of Clostridioides difficile
title_fullStr Inhibition of selenoprotein synthesis is not the mechanism by which auranofin inhibits growth of Clostridioides difficile
title_full_unstemmed Inhibition of selenoprotein synthesis is not the mechanism by which auranofin inhibits growth of Clostridioides difficile
title_short Inhibition of selenoprotein synthesis is not the mechanism by which auranofin inhibits growth of Clostridioides difficile
title_sort inhibition of selenoprotein synthesis is not the mechanism by which auranofin inhibits growth of clostridioides difficile
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36796-9
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelajohnstone inhibitionofselenoproteinsynthesisisnotthemechanismbywhichauranofininhibitsgrowthofclostridioidesdifficile
AT matthewaholman inhibitionofselenoproteinsynthesisisnotthemechanismbywhichauranofininhibitsgrowthofclostridioidesdifficile
AT williamtself inhibitionofselenoproteinsynthesisisnotthemechanismbywhichauranofininhibitsgrowthofclostridioidesdifficile